The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's another 2008 list that doesn't meet current standards. Major issues with sourcing as many of the awards and nominations lack references. Main image needs ALT text. 4 dead links. Ref 2 and the Rolling Stone references are redirects. Cowlibob ( talk) 21:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is substantially different from the December 2008 edition that was promoted and hasn't been well-maintained since. It overall has deteriorated in quality and fails to meet current FL standards. The lead is outdated, only going up to 2008. Some of the awards are missing descriptions. There are also many dead links, incorrect uses (as well as absence of) italics within citations, and dubious references such as Gigwise, "Anti Music", and "BlackCelebrityGiving". Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [3]. reply
I don't think I need to specify reasons. It's pretty clear that List of awards and nominations received by 50 Cent does not meet FL criteria anymore. The list was promoted back in 2007. It has a large number of dead links and unsourced content. The lead needs work and expansion to satisfy the FL criterion#1. The number of awards are miscounted in infobox. The tables also do not meet MOS:DTAB. -- Frankie talk 21:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 23:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [4]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because of a number of concerns. I feel it's another list promoted in 2008 that doesn't meet current standards. The lead is far too short and does not give a sufficient engaging summary of the list. It also begins with "This is a list of ...", a format we no longer use. The list does not seem to be up to date in terms of figures and there could potentially be organisations that aren't present on the list due to the lack of updates which are both mentioned on the talkpage. The table lacks rowscopes and colscopes so it is not accessible. References show 4 dead links and 1 redirect to main page of the site. Cowlibob ( talk) 13:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. -- Pres N 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [5]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is another list from 2008 which doesn't meet current standards. The lead is not comprehensive and seems to stop in 2008. Using "Recently..." is not encyclopaedic. Much of the awards are sourced to Rock on the Net which is an unreliable source per WikiProject Music. The MTV Video Music Awards Japan, World Music Awards, and Grammy Awards are all unsourced. The World Music Awards are still pending despite being in 2014. Reference 9 is dead. Ref 6 and 8 are redirects. Cowlibob ( talk) 18:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. -- Pres N 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's another 2008 list that doesn't meet current standards. Major issues with sourcing as many of the awards and nominations lack references. Main image needs ALT text. 4 dead links. Ref 2 and the Rolling Stone references are redirects. Cowlibob ( talk) 21:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is substantially different from the December 2008 edition that was promoted and hasn't been well-maintained since. It overall has deteriorated in quality and fails to meet current FL standards. The lead is outdated, only going up to 2008. Some of the awards are missing descriptions. There are also many dead links, incorrect uses (as well as absence of) italics within citations, and dubious references such as Gigwise, "Anti Music", and "BlackCelebrityGiving". Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [3]. reply
I don't think I need to specify reasons. It's pretty clear that List of awards and nominations received by 50 Cent does not meet FL criteria anymore. The list was promoted back in 2007. It has a large number of dead links and unsourced content. The lead needs work and expansion to satisfy the FL criterion#1. The number of awards are miscounted in infobox. The tables also do not meet MOS:DTAB. -- Frankie talk 21:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 23:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [4]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because of a number of concerns. I feel it's another list promoted in 2008 that doesn't meet current standards. The lead is far too short and does not give a sufficient engaging summary of the list. It also begins with "This is a list of ...", a format we no longer use. The list does not seem to be up to date in terms of figures and there could potentially be organisations that aren't present on the list due to the lack of updates which are both mentioned on the talkpage. The table lacks rowscopes and colscopes so it is not accessible. References show 4 dead links and 1 redirect to main page of the site. Cowlibob ( talk) 13:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. -- Pres N 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [5]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is another list from 2008 which doesn't meet current standards. The lead is not comprehensive and seems to stop in 2008. Using "Recently..." is not encyclopaedic. Much of the awards are sourced to Rock on the Net which is an unreliable source per WikiProject Music. The MTV Video Music Awards Japan, World Music Awards, and Grammy Awards are all unsourced. The World Music Awards are still pending despite being in 2014. Reference 9 is dead. Ref 6 and 8 are redirects. Cowlibob ( talk) 18:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. -- Pres N 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply