The list was kept by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [1].
List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates should be delisted as a featured list immediately. I was the creator of the list, and I'm amazed that it was nominated and promoted to FL without proper research, and nobody notified about the FL nomination to me. Many rationales given in the list are flawed. Examples?
Rationales given for so many Peace Prize laureates are flawed. Nobelprize.org has not provided specific rationales for awarding the Peace Prize from 1901 to 1989. We have to work harder, and find specific rationales from elsewhere. Copy-and-paste won't work. When I created the list I was aware of these problems. I was busy working on the bios of American Civil War generals, so I couldn't work on the list for so long. It is embarrassing that this list was promoted to FL. AdjustShift ( talk) 13:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment AdjustShift, list all of the entries that you have a problem with, and I'll find full rationales (and sources for them). -- Scorpion 0422 15:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep per FLRC requirement I echoed User:Dabomb87's comment that the purpose of this process is for improvement, not removal. That aside, I want to speed keep this article because I am not convinced by the nominator's argument. All listed complaints appear to be easy fixes that can be resolved via the list's talk page.— Chris! c t 00:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Okay, I have asked Sephiroth to leave this open for the time being, so please stop with the speedy removalkeep comments. AdjustShift, please list every entry here that you have a problem with (and don't just say all). --
Scorpion
0422
14:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
reply
What's the status here? If the rationales have been fixed, then there should be no reason to keep this FLRC open. Dabomb87 ( talk) 18:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:08, 21 February 2009 [2].
Has many of the same problems as Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Drama:
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [3].
Failure of 5½ out of the 7 criteria is more than grounds for a removal nom. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I probably won't have time to save this myself, but I have addressed the concerns you made at Cr.3 (including the talk page thing). Another problem is I am not enough of a film buff to know which producers to list. For example, the "American Gangster" entry only lists Grazer as producer, whereas it article lists Ridley Scott, Brian Grazer, James Whitaker, Steven Zaillian, and Nicholas Pileggi all as producers. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [4].
This list fails to note any independent reliable sources for real-world impact or reception any of the characters have had. じん ない 21:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) May not be bad, but needs improvement to meet current standards. More specifically, it fails FL criteria on prose, sources and comprehensiveness.
Delist Little effort has been make to address my comments. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Delist as needing too much work, and without a dedicated editor to spend time on it. Renominate for FL if and independant sources found and other problems fixed. The making of DVD would be enough to save it from AfD, but not for FL imo.
Yobmod (
talk)
17:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [5].
indifferent
today." PASS. Case 2: I'm no feeling or passion
today." FAIL: DOES NOT PARSE AS ENGLISH.
The list was kept by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [1].
List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates should be delisted as a featured list immediately. I was the creator of the list, and I'm amazed that it was nominated and promoted to FL without proper research, and nobody notified about the FL nomination to me. Many rationales given in the list are flawed. Examples?
Rationales given for so many Peace Prize laureates are flawed. Nobelprize.org has not provided specific rationales for awarding the Peace Prize from 1901 to 1989. We have to work harder, and find specific rationales from elsewhere. Copy-and-paste won't work. When I created the list I was aware of these problems. I was busy working on the bios of American Civil War generals, so I couldn't work on the list for so long. It is embarrassing that this list was promoted to FL. AdjustShift ( talk) 13:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment AdjustShift, list all of the entries that you have a problem with, and I'll find full rationales (and sources for them). -- Scorpion 0422 15:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep per FLRC requirement I echoed User:Dabomb87's comment that the purpose of this process is for improvement, not removal. That aside, I want to speed keep this article because I am not convinced by the nominator's argument. All listed complaints appear to be easy fixes that can be resolved via the list's talk page.— Chris! c t 00:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Okay, I have asked Sephiroth to leave this open for the time being, so please stop with the speedy removalkeep comments. AdjustShift, please list every entry here that you have a problem with (and don't just say all). --
Scorpion
0422
14:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
reply
What's the status here? If the rationales have been fixed, then there should be no reason to keep this FLRC open. Dabomb87 ( talk) 18:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:08, 21 February 2009 [2].
Has many of the same problems as Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Drama:
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [3].
Failure of 5½ out of the 7 criteria is more than grounds for a removal nom. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I probably won't have time to save this myself, but I have addressed the concerns you made at Cr.3 (including the talk page thing). Another problem is I am not enough of a film buff to know which producers to list. For example, the "American Gangster" entry only lists Grazer as producer, whereas it article lists Ridley Scott, Brian Grazer, James Whitaker, Steven Zaillian, and Nicholas Pileggi all as producers. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [4].
This list fails to note any independent reliable sources for real-world impact or reception any of the characters have had. じん ない 21:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) May not be bad, but needs improvement to meet current standards. More specifically, it fails FL criteria on prose, sources and comprehensiveness.
Delist Little effort has been make to address my comments. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Delist as needing too much work, and without a dedicated editor to spend time on it. Renominate for FL if and independant sources found and other problems fixed. The making of DVD would be enough to save it from AfD, but not for FL imo.
Yobmod (
talk)
17:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:12, 10 February 2009 [5].
indifferent
today." PASS. Case 2: I'm no feeling or passion
today." FAIL: DOES NOT PARSE AS ENGLISH.