The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 16:20, 3 January 2015 [1].
List of tributaries of Catawissa Creek ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because:
I haven't had much luck with featured content, but hopefully this will pass. Thanks for considering it. -- Jakob ( talk) 01:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comment - I think it would be best to list details similar to those found in
List of tributaries of Larrys Creek; I think it's valuable information that would lead to a much more comprehensive list, and I don't see any reason to not include it when it's available. Also, nice job with the taking the pictures! I know it's not easy. However, I'm not a huge fan of the missing pictures (10 out of the 26). Not sure what others think, but it may be worth removing the images column, and instead provide only a few of the best images in a gallery (as is done with the Larrys Creek list). The water bodies aren't particularly distinguishable from each other, so I don't think images for each listing add much value (especially when other data could be included in its place). At the same time, though, doesn't hurt to include them. Finally, I'd definitely include page numbers when referencing the lengthy PDFs. ~
Super
Hamster
Talk
Contribs
05:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comment the above oppose is really just IDONTLIKEIT. All the items in the list have their own articles, and I see no problem at all with gathering them into a list. Unless the commentator actions his own threats, this nomination is good to go. So, some actionable items.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply
|
– SchroCat ( talk) 23:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Support. All good now. A map would have been ideal, to show the location and/or course, but there's nothing obvious on Commons. Maybe have a quick search to see if you can find anything PD, but that doesn't affect my support here. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 07:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Support I was asked to comment here and find it meets the FLC criteria. I have made some minor copy edits to the article to polish the prose. I am impressed that there are so many images of the tributaries, and added one of Catawissa Creek itself to the lead. I think it would be great if a map could be added - have you tried asking User:Kmusser, who makes beautiful stream maps? Even when a map is added, I would still include a picture of the main stem (Catawissa Creek itself) in the article. The only quibble I have is that the reference links in the three Notes are just URLs and should be formatted like any other web ref in a FL. I am OK with this being different than the Larrys Creek trib list (which I am the main author of), but do think it would be pretty easy to add left and right bank info here (to the list itself), as well as mentioning river mile explicitly (I know it is linked). Nicely done, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 16:20, 3 January 2015 [1].
List of tributaries of Catawissa Creek ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because:
I haven't had much luck with featured content, but hopefully this will pass. Thanks for considering it. -- Jakob ( talk) 01:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comment - I think it would be best to list details similar to those found in
List of tributaries of Larrys Creek; I think it's valuable information that would lead to a much more comprehensive list, and I don't see any reason to not include it when it's available. Also, nice job with the taking the pictures! I know it's not easy. However, I'm not a huge fan of the missing pictures (10 out of the 26). Not sure what others think, but it may be worth removing the images column, and instead provide only a few of the best images in a gallery (as is done with the Larrys Creek list). The water bodies aren't particularly distinguishable from each other, so I don't think images for each listing add much value (especially when other data could be included in its place). At the same time, though, doesn't hurt to include them. Finally, I'd definitely include page numbers when referencing the lengthy PDFs. ~
Super
Hamster
Talk
Contribs
05:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comment the above oppose is really just IDONTLIKEIT. All the items in the list have their own articles, and I see no problem at all with gathering them into a list. Unless the commentator actions his own threats, this nomination is good to go. So, some actionable items.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply
|
– SchroCat ( talk) 23:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Support. All good now. A map would have been ideal, to show the location and/or course, but there's nothing obvious on Commons. Maybe have a quick search to see if you can find anything PD, but that doesn't affect my support here. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 07:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Support I was asked to comment here and find it meets the FLC criteria. I have made some minor copy edits to the article to polish the prose. I am impressed that there are so many images of the tributaries, and added one of Catawissa Creek itself to the lead. I think it would be great if a map could be added - have you tried asking User:Kmusser, who makes beautiful stream maps? Even when a map is added, I would still include a picture of the main stem (Catawissa Creek itself) in the article. The only quibble I have is that the reference links in the three Notes are just URLs and should be formatted like any other web ref in a FL. I am OK with this being different than the Larrys Creek trib list (which I am the main author of), but do think it would be pretty easy to add left and right bank info here (to the list itself), as well as mentioning river mile explicitly (I know it is linked). Nicely done, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC) reply