The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:12, 2 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I have worked on this list for the last few weeks after walking around the city and taking pictures of the tallest buildings. Looking to the other similar FLs, I have attempted to format this list accordingly and I believe the article now meets the FL criteria. Let me know if you see any issues and I will get to them as soon as possible. Thank you for taking a look and happy reviewing! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 05:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Support. I too would like to see a little more information listed for each building in the "notes" section, but this is a fine article regardless. Ahodges7 talk 02:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Review by Truco ( talk · contribs)
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Oppose but comments which will hopefully help.
|
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:12, 2 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I have worked on this list for the last few weeks after walking around the city and taking pictures of the tallest buildings. Looking to the other similar FLs, I have attempted to format this list accordingly and I believe the article now meets the FL criteria. Let me know if you see any issues and I will get to them as soon as possible. Thank you for taking a look and happy reviewing! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 05:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Support. I too would like to see a little more information listed for each building in the "notes" section, but this is a fine article regardless. Ahodges7 talk 02:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Review by Truco ( talk · contribs)
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Oppose but comments which will hopefully help.
|