The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:25, 9 January 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This list was a recent featured list candidate. The nomination failed due to a lack of reviewers. All comments of the previous nomination have been addressed and the list has virtually not changed since then. I nominate it again because I think that it meets all the criteria for a featured list. Hoping for more reviewers this time. bamse ( talk) 09:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from WFCforLife ( talk) 01:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
:*"The 158 entries in the list consist of the following: 90 are hanging scrolls; 38 are hand scrolls or emakimono; 20 are byōbu folding screens or paintings on sliding doors (fusuma); and three are albums." This does not tally to 158.
I can't fault the table itself, that's absolutely wonderful. Hope these help for now, WFCforLife ( talk) 01:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC) reply
|
I'm happy with the lead, it's very well-written.
Not speaking Japanese, it's difficult for me to express opinions on most of the references. The best quality sources are going to be Japanese, and therefore we should use them. What I would ask is that at least one of the |publisher= or |author= fields is filled in for each reference, so that a non-speaker can ascertain where the information is coming from. There are a few references with a Japanese title, followed by (in Japanese) and retrieved on yyyy-mm-dd, which isn't really enough information. WFCforLife ( talk) 01:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose Support
It's a good list, but more information needs to be provided before I can support it. Of course, in some cases it may not be available, but it is worth investigating. I'm impressed by what I see, and a lot of effort has been put in; the alt text must have been particularly time consuming. I hope that with a bit more, I will be able to support. Nev1 ( talk) 04:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:25, 9 January 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This list was a recent featured list candidate. The nomination failed due to a lack of reviewers. All comments of the previous nomination have been addressed and the list has virtually not changed since then. I nominate it again because I think that it meets all the criteria for a featured list. Hoping for more reviewers this time. bamse ( talk) 09:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from WFCforLife ( talk) 01:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
:*"The 158 entries in the list consist of the following: 90 are hanging scrolls; 38 are hand scrolls or emakimono; 20 are byōbu folding screens or paintings on sliding doors (fusuma); and three are albums." This does not tally to 158.
I can't fault the table itself, that's absolutely wonderful. Hope these help for now, WFCforLife ( talk) 01:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC) reply
|
I'm happy with the lead, it's very well-written.
Not speaking Japanese, it's difficult for me to express opinions on most of the references. The best quality sources are going to be Japanese, and therefore we should use them. What I would ask is that at least one of the |publisher= or |author= fields is filled in for each reference, so that a non-speaker can ascertain where the information is coming from. There are a few references with a Japanese title, followed by (in Japanese) and retrieved on yyyy-mm-dd, which isn't really enough information. WFCforLife ( talk) 01:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose Support
It's a good list, but more information needs to be provided before I can support it. Of course, in some cases it may not be available, but it is worth investigating. I'm impressed by what I see, and a lot of effort has been put in; the alt text must have been particularly time consuming. I hope that with a bit more, I will be able to support. Nev1 ( talk) 04:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply