The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 15:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
The Latin Grammy Award for Best Alternative Music Album is an honor presented annually by the Latin Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences at the Latin Grammy Awards. According to the category description guide for the 2012 Latin Grammy Awards, the award is for vocal or instrumental alternative albums. It is awarded to solo artists, duos or groups. → Call me Hahc 21, Statυs ( talk, contribs) 01:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 15:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) [2]. reply
One more centuries list; probably my last in this category. Look forward to your comments and suggestions — Vensatry (Ping) 04:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments -
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 23:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC) [3]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because this is one of a series of Anatomical terminology lists that I would like to nominate. These articles are viewed by several hundred thousand people a year, and are one of the more important article's under the scope of WP:ANATOMY. I've tried very hard to make this readable and easily-understood, and would value not only any feedback on FL nomination but on how readily understood the article is, as I plan to nominate the other articles in the future. Kind regards, LT910001 ( talk) 01:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from PresN
|
---|
|
Support - there's a point outstanding, but I'm comfortable supporting now since it's just moving a reference around. -- Pres N 18:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments Support. This is a good article and I found the definitions generally clear. My queries are mainly on prose.
Resolved comments from Dudley Miles
|
---|
Dudley Miles ( talk) 21:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your comments, Dudley Miles. I've tried to address your concerns. -- LT910001 ( talk) 00:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
I've made a number of basic changes to this: removing the spaces before refs, moving pp. to p. for single pages in the citations etc.
Thanks to all the users for their comments. It's now two and a half months since nomination, and three users have voiced their support, with none opposing. Is there a way to conclude this review? -- LT910001 ( talk) 21:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 04:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC) [4]]. reply
I am nominating this article for a featured list. The content of this page was previously placed on the Marvel Cinematic Universe page, and while there, was awaiting GA review. A decision between these editors decided to split the list content off, before the GA review started, so I am nominating this content here to be considered for a Featured list. All nominators have worked hard to get this content to where it is today. Please note, as I mentioned, that this content was split off from Marvel Cinematic Universe, and history edits for this content would be on that page. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 15:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comments Support:
- SchroCat ( talk) 16:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
I will admit that these links also make me feel a little uncomfortable. It may not have been the original motive in adding the link (which I am sure was in good faith), but canvassing/spamming does seem to be one of the results. I'm not sure that saying "the link is there, people don't have to follow it" avoids the issue: that's the same situation as with any canvassing or spamming. Can I strongly suggest that you remove these links from the signatures, if only because the reasons for which they were added could be misconstrued. - SchroCat ( talk) 09:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by SchroCat 08:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC) [5]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list so that I can develop a consistent discography style for Japanese music pages. Since I began editing the page in December 2013 it has been very stable (well, as stable as a currently releasing musician's discography can be), and I believe it satisfies the criteria! Prosperosity ( talk) 01:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Ryoga ( talk) |
---|
;Comments
The list is laid out neatly, and everything is sourced. These are just a few things which caught my attention:
That's all I could find. Great work! Ryoga ( talk) 11:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 12:35, 22 May 2014 [6].
Hello everyone. Here again nominating another list which I believe is of featured quality. I have redeveloped the article mainly based on List of The Simpsons guest stars, which is the only featured guest star list here on en.wiki. The main table lists all the guest stars who have appeared on the show. The list-article also details how the crew casts familiar voices. I welcome any comments, suggestions, and others. Thanks in advance. Mediran ( t • c) 13:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Prosperosity ( talk) 02:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comment – Is it possible to incorporate SpongeBob Exposed! into the general references, citing the places where the book was referenced? --
Prosperosity (
talk)
10:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
- SchroCat ( talk) 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
All good: moving to support now. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 12:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 11:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC) [7]]. reply
This list follows the format of the other NNL lists that I have recently brought to FLC, with changes based on feedback from those nominations. I look forward to comments! Dana boomer ( talk) 18:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments:
Otherwise, I think this list meets featured status. Thanks for the contribution. Seattle ( talk) 22:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Otherwise a good piece of work. The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Support; I've taken the bold out of the opening line: it's advised against in the MoS (only the full title, not a part of it should be bolded). Nice piece of work, very well put together. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 09:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC) [8]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because its sister list Yugoslav order of battle for the invasion of Yugoslavia was promoted to FLC in November 2013, and I believe this list is now at the same standard. These two lists have resulted from a significant amount of work and will contribute to comprehensive coverage of the April 1941 Axis invasion of Yugoslavia on en WP. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 22:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Not sure I agree with the implication that including them in the section heading means they are on par with the Army, they are listed second for a reason. They were merely another land force component but as they were not formally part of the Army or even the Wehrmacht (despite being under Army control), I've included them after the Army. They actually performed key tasks in the invasion, Reich (for example) captured Belgrade. I do not see what the issue is. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Good point re: Reich, an oversight. Thanks, will fix. Re: LSSAH, yes, I know, but I believe the designation on the ORBAT for it is correct for that time. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
I don't necessarily see the correlation between aircraft, guns and tanks. Numbers of aircraft assist in clarifying strength across different aircraft formation types (squadrons, wings, groups etc). Tank and gun numbers not so much (in that respect at least). However, I will see what data is available. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Bloody good question, a brainfart by the look of it. Will fix. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 13:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Support Comments
( send... over) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 11:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Images, in addition to the problem I mentioned above about the Ca. 135bis photo:
Everything else checks out. Parsecboy ( talk) 19:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 00:07, 08 May 2014 (UTC) [10]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it is part of a project for the Lo Nuestro Awards that were considered the "Latin Grammys", before the inception of the actual Latin Grammy Award. References for the first ceremonies are hard to find, I even sent emails to Univision and Billboard magazine to find out about the nominees on the missing years, with no success. This was a hard investigation by Erick and yours truly. I will be attentive to your comments and help to improve the article. Thanks. Javier Espinoza ( talk) 07:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Question: Why was the first FL nomination closed? -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Quick Comments: There are several red links in this list. If there is no article to the list, then it should not be linked.
Where does it say that red links should not be linked? According to WP:RED, red links encourage creation of articles. Premio Lo Nuestro 2013 and Premio Lo Nuestro 2014 should be linked and created. -- K.Annoyomous (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments from -- K.Annoyomous (talk)
-- K.Annoyomous (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC) reply
— Status ( talk · contribs) 01:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply
— Status ( talk · contribs) 01:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply
And that is pretty much it, since the list is already in very good shape. I trust that you will address my comments as necessary, and am happy in giving my support to the nomination! WikiRedactor ( talk) 23:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment you do realise that this currently isn't listed at FLC at all? The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [11]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it has been improved significantly over the past month and now meets all 6 FL criteria. — Bloom6132 ( talk) 22:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved objection from Cloudz679
|
---|
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 4 May 2014 [12].
I am nominating the 2007 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 Oscars were written. Please note that some references were retrieved via Internet Archive.-- Birdienest81 ( talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment "Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface.[20]"—No they aren't...— indopug ( talk) 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [13]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it garnered much support votes last time but wasn't passed due to it being archived early. It's a great list, very informative and accurate. It exposes a side of world history that few may know about. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 20:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Having read and re-read your comment, I don't think you understand what I said. I'm talking about "Survivor" and "Survived" (the references to "Killed" and "Died" were putting my statement into context). "Survivor" is a noun, while "Survived" is a verb. "Killed" and "died" are also verbs, and there should be a consistency in the list. We can't be mixing these things around :). Other than that, it's a great list and I'm happy to support provided this issue is resolved. 23 editor ( talk) 02:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:46, May 4, 2014 (UTC) [14]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL requirements. Bluesatellite ( talk) 04:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Title | Year |
---|---|
Vision Quest | 1985 |
Desperately Seeking Susan |
Title | Year | Creator(s) |
---|---|---|
Saturday Night Live | 1985 | Lorne Michaels |
1986 |
After this, you have my support! XXSNUGGUMSXX ( talk) 20:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from - KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Prose
|
Resolved comments from - AB01 I'M A POTATO 04:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from AB01
You guys have done pretty well on this article, so these are the only comments I can think of. Good luck :D AB01 I'M A POTATO 09:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Status ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
*I'd like to see a bit more variety instead of always starting sentences in the lead with "In (year)". For example, with these two sentences: In 1986, she made her theatrical debut in David Rabe's Goose and Tom-Tom and her first commercial for Mitsubishi in Japan.[7][8] In 1989, she starred in the commercial for Pepsi-Cola alongside her song "Like a Prayer." (the period should also be outside of the quotation marks).
— Status ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comment it's really weird that music videos aren't mentioned at all, especially given that commercials have their own table. If they are dealt with in another article, you should have a note at the top, "for a list of her music videos, see this".— indopug ( talk) 05:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [15]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because Priyanka Chopra is one of the most popular and versatile actresses in Hindi cinema. The article has been thoroughly researched and is a comprehensive and well-written account of her filmography. The lead covers the most important content from the table, which is sortable.— Prashant and ♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [16]]. reply
Karnataka is a south Indian state, probably best-known to the wider world for its capital city Bangalore, as well as beautiful historical cities such as Mysore and Hampi. This is a list of the state's chief ministers—i.e. chief executives of the state govt a la governors in the United States. I look forward to your feedback; any issues will be resolved quickly.— indopug ( talk) 18:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 15:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
The Latin Grammy Award for Best Alternative Music Album is an honor presented annually by the Latin Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences at the Latin Grammy Awards. According to the category description guide for the 2012 Latin Grammy Awards, the award is for vocal or instrumental alternative albums. It is awarded to solo artists, duos or groups. → Call me Hahc 21, Statυs ( talk, contribs) 01:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 15:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) [2]. reply
One more centuries list; probably my last in this category. Look forward to your comments and suggestions — Vensatry (Ping) 04:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments -
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 23:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC) [3]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because this is one of a series of Anatomical terminology lists that I would like to nominate. These articles are viewed by several hundred thousand people a year, and are one of the more important article's under the scope of WP:ANATOMY. I've tried very hard to make this readable and easily-understood, and would value not only any feedback on FL nomination but on how readily understood the article is, as I plan to nominate the other articles in the future. Kind regards, LT910001 ( talk) 01:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from PresN
|
---|
|
Support - there's a point outstanding, but I'm comfortable supporting now since it's just moving a reference around. -- Pres N 18:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments Support. This is a good article and I found the definitions generally clear. My queries are mainly on prose.
Resolved comments from Dudley Miles
|
---|
Dudley Miles ( talk) 21:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your comments, Dudley Miles. I've tried to address your concerns. -- LT910001 ( talk) 00:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
I've made a number of basic changes to this: removing the spaces before refs, moving pp. to p. for single pages in the citations etc.
Thanks to all the users for their comments. It's now two and a half months since nomination, and three users have voiced their support, with none opposing. Is there a way to conclude this review? -- LT910001 ( talk) 21:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 04:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC) [4]]. reply
I am nominating this article for a featured list. The content of this page was previously placed on the Marvel Cinematic Universe page, and while there, was awaiting GA review. A decision between these editors decided to split the list content off, before the GA review started, so I am nominating this content here to be considered for a Featured list. All nominators have worked hard to get this content to where it is today. Please note, as I mentioned, that this content was split off from Marvel Cinematic Universe, and history edits for this content would be on that page. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 15:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comments Support:
- SchroCat ( talk) 16:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
I will admit that these links also make me feel a little uncomfortable. It may not have been the original motive in adding the link (which I am sure was in good faith), but canvassing/spamming does seem to be one of the results. I'm not sure that saying "the link is there, people don't have to follow it" avoids the issue: that's the same situation as with any canvassing or spamming. Can I strongly suggest that you remove these links from the signatures, if only because the reasons for which they were added could be misconstrued. - SchroCat ( talk) 09:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by SchroCat 08:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC) [5]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list so that I can develop a consistent discography style for Japanese music pages. Since I began editing the page in December 2013 it has been very stable (well, as stable as a currently releasing musician's discography can be), and I believe it satisfies the criteria! Prosperosity ( talk) 01:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Ryoga ( talk) |
---|
;Comments
The list is laid out neatly, and everything is sourced. These are just a few things which caught my attention:
That's all I could find. Great work! Ryoga ( talk) 11:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 12:35, 22 May 2014 [6].
Hello everyone. Here again nominating another list which I believe is of featured quality. I have redeveloped the article mainly based on List of The Simpsons guest stars, which is the only featured guest star list here on en.wiki. The main table lists all the guest stars who have appeared on the show. The list-article also details how the crew casts familiar voices. I welcome any comments, suggestions, and others. Thanks in advance. Mediran ( t • c) 13:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Prosperosity ( talk) 02:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comment – Is it possible to incorporate SpongeBob Exposed! into the general references, citing the places where the book was referenced? --
Prosperosity (
talk)
10:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
- SchroCat ( talk) 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
All good: moving to support now. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 12:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 11:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC) [7]]. reply
This list follows the format of the other NNL lists that I have recently brought to FLC, with changes based on feedback from those nominations. I look forward to comments! Dana boomer ( talk) 18:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments:
Otherwise, I think this list meets featured status. Thanks for the contribution. Seattle ( talk) 22:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Otherwise a good piece of work. The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Support; I've taken the bold out of the opening line: it's advised against in the MoS (only the full title, not a part of it should be bolded). Nice piece of work, very well put together. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 09:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC) [8]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because its sister list Yugoslav order of battle for the invasion of Yugoslavia was promoted to FLC in November 2013, and I believe this list is now at the same standard. These two lists have resulted from a significant amount of work and will contribute to comprehensive coverage of the April 1941 Axis invasion of Yugoslavia on en WP. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 22:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Not sure I agree with the implication that including them in the section heading means they are on par with the Army, they are listed second for a reason. They were merely another land force component but as they were not formally part of the Army or even the Wehrmacht (despite being under Army control), I've included them after the Army. They actually performed key tasks in the invasion, Reich (for example) captured Belgrade. I do not see what the issue is. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Good point re: Reich, an oversight. Thanks, will fix. Re: LSSAH, yes, I know, but I believe the designation on the ORBAT for it is correct for that time. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
I don't necessarily see the correlation between aircraft, guns and tanks. Numbers of aircraft assist in clarifying strength across different aircraft formation types (squadrons, wings, groups etc). Tank and gun numbers not so much (in that respect at least). However, I will see what data is available. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Bloody good question, a brainfart by the look of it. Will fix. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 13:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Support Comments
( send... over) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 11:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Images, in addition to the problem I mentioned above about the Ca. 135bis photo:
Everything else checks out. Parsecboy ( talk) 19:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 00:07, 08 May 2014 (UTC) [10]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it is part of a project for the Lo Nuestro Awards that were considered the "Latin Grammys", before the inception of the actual Latin Grammy Award. References for the first ceremonies are hard to find, I even sent emails to Univision and Billboard magazine to find out about the nominees on the missing years, with no success. This was a hard investigation by Erick and yours truly. I will be attentive to your comments and help to improve the article. Thanks. Javier Espinoza ( talk) 07:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Question: Why was the first FL nomination closed? -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Quick Comments: There are several red links in this list. If there is no article to the list, then it should not be linked.
Where does it say that red links should not be linked? According to WP:RED, red links encourage creation of articles. Premio Lo Nuestro 2013 and Premio Lo Nuestro 2014 should be linked and created. -- K.Annoyomous (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments from -- K.Annoyomous (talk)
-- K.Annoyomous (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC) reply
— Status ( talk · contribs) 01:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply
— Status ( talk · contribs) 01:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply
And that is pretty much it, since the list is already in very good shape. I trust that you will address my comments as necessary, and am happy in giving my support to the nomination! WikiRedactor ( talk) 23:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment you do realise that this currently isn't listed at FLC at all? The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [11]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it has been improved significantly over the past month and now meets all 6 FL criteria. — Bloom6132 ( talk) 22:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved objection from Cloudz679
|
---|
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 4 May 2014 [12].
I am nominating the 2007 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 Oscars were written. Please note that some references were retrieved via Internet Archive.-- Birdienest81 ( talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment "Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface.[20]"—No they aren't...— indopug ( talk) 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [13]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it garnered much support votes last time but wasn't passed due to it being archived early. It's a great list, very informative and accurate. It exposes a side of world history that few may know about. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 20:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Having read and re-read your comment, I don't think you understand what I said. I'm talking about "Survivor" and "Survived" (the references to "Killed" and "Died" were putting my statement into context). "Survivor" is a noun, while "Survived" is a verb. "Killed" and "died" are also verbs, and there should be a consistency in the list. We can't be mixing these things around :). Other than that, it's a great list and I'm happy to support provided this issue is resolved. 23 editor ( talk) 02:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:46, May 4, 2014 (UTC) [14]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL requirements. Bluesatellite ( talk) 04:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Title | Year |
---|---|
Vision Quest | 1985 |
Desperately Seeking Susan |
Title | Year | Creator(s) |
---|---|---|
Saturday Night Live | 1985 | Lorne Michaels |
1986 |
After this, you have my support! XXSNUGGUMSXX ( talk) 20:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from - KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Prose
|
Resolved comments from - AB01 I'M A POTATO 04:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from AB01
You guys have done pretty well on this article, so these are the only comments I can think of. Good luck :D AB01 I'M A POTATO 09:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Status ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
*I'd like to see a bit more variety instead of always starting sentences in the lead with "In (year)". For example, with these two sentences: In 1986, she made her theatrical debut in David Rabe's Goose and Tom-Tom and her first commercial for Mitsubishi in Japan.[7][8] In 1989, she starred in the commercial for Pepsi-Cola alongside her song "Like a Prayer." (the period should also be outside of the quotation marks).
— Status ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comment it's really weird that music videos aren't mentioned at all, especially given that commercials have their own table. If they are dealt with in another article, you should have a note at the top, "for a list of her music videos, see this".— indopug ( talk) 05:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [15]]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because Priyanka Chopra is one of the most popular and versatile actresses in Hindi cinema. The article has been thoroughly researched and is a comprehensive and well-written account of her filmography. The lead covers the most important content from the table, which is sortable.— Prashant and ♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 04 May 2014 (UTC) [16]]. reply
Karnataka is a south Indian state, probably best-known to the wider world for its capital city Bangalore, as well as beautiful historical cities such as Mysore and Hampi. This is a list of the state's chief ministers—i.e. chief executives of the state govt a la governors in the United States. I look forward to your feedback; any issues will be resolved quickly.— indopug ( talk) 18:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC) reply