The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
This is the latest of my nominations of wildlife trusts, and is in the same format as the Herts and Middlesex and Essex Trusts, which are FLs. Dudley Miles ( talk) 11:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
This looks very good.
Great work; I will be happy to support after these comments have been dealt with. N Oneemuss ( talk) 17:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2015 Indian Tamil action thriller film, Thani Oruvan starring Jayam Ravi and Nayanthara. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members, especially Ravi and Arvind Swamy, several awards and nominations. It is my seventh attempt at a accolades FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Wonderful work with the list. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 ( talk) 04:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC) [3]. reply
This is a list of awards and nominations received by the 2011 crime movie Drive. It's a real shame that no one even bothered to work on this list before. I am nominating this for featured list because I believe I have met the comprehensiveness criteria by gathering all the awards there is to this movie, as well as summarizing to the readers significant details of the accolades through the prose. This is the first film accolades list I've worked on, so hopefully this goes well. Blue sphere 05:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen ( talk) 12:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Littlecarmen
|
Those are the only problems I found with the lead section. The awards all seem to be in order and placed alphabetically. Unfortunately I currently lack the mental stamina to perform a source review. However, if they check out and my above comments are adressed I believe I could support the nomination. PanagiotisZois ( talk) 21:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC) reply
P.S.: Regarding the Florida Film Critics Circle, I think I made a mistake and wrote Critics Awards instead of Circle up there. So don't worry about it. PanagiotisZois ( talk) 19:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Great work with this list. I honestly could not find much to comment on for this list as it is already very good and has appeared to received pretty extensive commentary from the users above me. Once my rather minor note is addressed, I will support this. Hope you are having a wonderful day so far. Aoba47 ( talk) 15:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Comments –
Source Review: Only some small points. -- Pres N 18:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [4]. reply
I was lurking around looking for a mini-project and stumbled on this little number. Some interesting stories, and a fascinating glimpse of how the world powers in cricket have swung since the 1980s. As always, thanks in advance to anyone prepared to take the time to review this, I will endeavour to get to any and all comments as soon as practicable. Cheers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Harrias talk 07:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Bloom6132 ( talk) 21:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Initial comments after a cursory look; might add more later –
— Bloom6132 ( talk) 20:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Final comments –
— Bloom6132 ( talk) 17:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Hi TRM, some of these are only suggestions. Some bits confused me so I may have got my wires crossed.
That's all. Thanks. JennyOz ( talk) 16:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC) [5]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because Cate Blanchett is one of the best actresses of all time and probably the best of her generation. Her list deserves to be celebrated, much like her films and achievements. I feel it meets the FL criteria. Looking forward to lots of feedback on this. Krish | Talk 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC) reply
That's about it from me. I do recommend a thorough source review for the list. Krish, good job on taking an initiative to get Cate Balnchett's filmography and stage work list this far. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Hmm...
More to follow... ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 09:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Let me know once they are done. I will return after three days. ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 06:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Fine work Krish, this is one of best written introductions that I've read here. The first two paragraphs sure are. Good job. Numerounovedant Talk 17:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Source review –
Of the 3 citations I spot-checked, I found issues with 2 of them (ref 65 checked out fine), which is somewhat concerning. Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC) [6]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because after over 1,500 edits and over 500 references added I think I've finally brought it to FL quality. While this is a dynamic list, I firmly believe it contains as comprehensive a list of all notable persons who can be reliably sourced to have died from overdose or acute intoxication as is currently possible. In populating this list I have decided to be as inclusive as possible so as to not be accused of overlooking anybody. I anticipate several people on the list will be challenged, and have no issues with anyone being removed if their cause of death is deemed to not clearly meet the criteria. Freikorp ( talk) 13:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment - Just a quick comment, since this list is about people who died, I think it would benefit the article to have a small image gallery of some of the most famous people on this list, and remove the picture showing an injection of heroin. Mattximus ( talk) 22:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Oppose – at the moment, this list falls well short of our ??Featured list criteria in my opinion. Particularly with regards to the thoroughness of the referencing, and the sortability of the table. Ialso think that on a list of this size, the lead could be more substantial; specifically with regards to providing more global statistics, and simply a bit more background – is there anything about why this is such a common cause of death? Harrias talk 12:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
! scope="row" |
is used in the table to define the row scope, while ! scope="col" |
does the same for the column headers.
Harrias
talk
14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
reply|agency=
parameter of the citation template, but as I say, you're right that it is less important than when there is a named author.
Harrias
talk
14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
reply
Oppose The biggest problem is defining the scope.
Support Quite strongly. While there are always nitpicks and each of us has preferences, this list is quite important. Very simply, there is no other list like it anywhere on the Internet. This is Wikipedia at its finest. Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 22:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Ok, looks a lot better. One outstanding problem is the note on tramadol, which comes from the opinion of one pathologist. There must be some stats somewhere we can use instead. I'd dispute the fact as well (about tramadol) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Okay...in which case, tentative support (an ambitious and interesting list to put together. Good luck) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Support: Syntax looks fine to me but I would get rid of the "Ref" column and instead put the reference on the cause of death. I would also recommend using Template:sfn for citing books or journals for the convenience of the reader looking for data to cite. Vami IV ( talk) 06:42, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
Comments This was an ambitious list to improve, and I'm sure that, when it's promoted, it will set the standard for similar lists.
A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 10:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 23:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments Apologies for my absence. Like Freikorp says, I will support this list, but I do have some final comments.
A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 12:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC) reply
|
WriterArtistDC, Harrias, the list has been substantially improved since your comments, would you please re-visit your oppositions and either confirm you still oppose or strike/support please? Thanks. The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
A Thousand Doors, please double-check your concerns have been addressed and respond here if at all possible. Many thanks. The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [10]. reply
After a much-needed overhaul to Wikipedia's Pokémon listing, the main page for these eight articles (this list plus the seven sub-lists) now covers the basics of what these creatures are. Given the sheer number of Pokémon (802 as of the release of Sun and Moon in 2016), all of them could not be reasonably contained within a single list. This article covers the names of each Pokémon as well as some background behind their creation and design. It is primarily designed as a hub-list to redirect users to the seven more detailed sub-lists that are divided by generation. The table used for the Pokémon is a bit atypical and uses seven columns to divide the names rather than one obnoxiously long list with over 800 rows. It forgoes sorbability for the sake of accessibility and ease of reading. I believe this list to cover all that is necessary for it as more in-depth information is better handed in either the dedicated lists by generation and/or articles on the Pokémon themselves. Thank you in advance for your comments, criticism, and time! ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 17:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Otherwise it all looks reasonably good. I like the format you've used with the subpages. Harrias talk 07:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Overall, this list is very well written. My major gripes can be taken care of by taking the following steps: introduce and explain the idea of evolution, and of alternate forms (including Mega Evolution etc) in the second paragraph of "Conception". Then, in the first paragraph of "Design" use Generation VI's French influence as an example of regional influences in the creatures' design. Lastly, rewrite the second paragraph of the lead to be a general summary of the two body sections.
Excellent work on this list! You have come up with a creative solution to the unique problem of listing all Pokemon, and I like the result. This is quality work, and I am excited to see that it has been nominated at FLC! -- haha169 ( talk) 10:29, 22 June 2017
Good work on the list! I hope to see the generations lists here as well at some point, I love the new colors. -- Pres N 20:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I had a look over this list last week and could not see anything major wrong with it, as a result im happy to Support its promotion to FL. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC) [11]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it has been significantly reworked from its original state, and now I am convinced it is perfectly FL-worthy. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Comments Support –
Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N 14:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC) [12]. reply
We probably know American recording artist Madonna as an entertainer, musician, provocative artist who has pushed the boundaries of popular music. However, she has ventured into the world of books and as an author even wrote children's books (surprise!). This list has all the books she has written (or given foreword) and is an exhaustive collection. With the consensus of my fellow editors I would like this one to become a featured bibliography list, the first of its kind for a musician. — IB [ Poke ] 09:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC) reply
@ IndianBio: I think that is an overdetail to mention the background about Maverick company after is already mentioned in the main article and we have a link to know about this company. But what do you think?. Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 13:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Wonderful work with this list. These are the primary notes that I saw while reading through it. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 ( talk) 14:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply
A few problems, should be easy:
Closing as promoted. -- Pres N 14:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC) [13]. reply
Moonlight is a 2016 American drama about a young African-American gay man struggling with his sexuality. It won numerous awards including the Academy Award for Best Picture. This list covers these, as always look forward to all the helpful and constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob ( talk) 14:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Comments by Mymis
|
---|
Mymis ( talk) 01:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
This is the latest of my nominations of wildlife trusts, and is in the same format as the Herts and Middlesex and Essex Trusts, which are FLs. Dudley Miles ( talk) 11:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
This looks very good.
Great work; I will be happy to support after these comments have been dealt with. N Oneemuss ( talk) 17:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2015 Indian Tamil action thriller film, Thani Oruvan starring Jayam Ravi and Nayanthara. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members, especially Ravi and Arvind Swamy, several awards and nominations. It is my seventh attempt at a accolades FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Wonderful work with the list. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 ( talk) 04:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC) [3]. reply
This is a list of awards and nominations received by the 2011 crime movie Drive. It's a real shame that no one even bothered to work on this list before. I am nominating this for featured list because I believe I have met the comprehensiveness criteria by gathering all the awards there is to this movie, as well as summarizing to the readers significant details of the accolades through the prose. This is the first film accolades list I've worked on, so hopefully this goes well. Blue sphere 05:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen ( talk) 12:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Littlecarmen
|
Those are the only problems I found with the lead section. The awards all seem to be in order and placed alphabetically. Unfortunately I currently lack the mental stamina to perform a source review. However, if they check out and my above comments are adressed I believe I could support the nomination. PanagiotisZois ( talk) 21:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC) reply
P.S.: Regarding the Florida Film Critics Circle, I think I made a mistake and wrote Critics Awards instead of Circle up there. So don't worry about it. PanagiotisZois ( talk) 19:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Great work with this list. I honestly could not find much to comment on for this list as it is already very good and has appeared to received pretty extensive commentary from the users above me. Once my rather minor note is addressed, I will support this. Hope you are having a wonderful day so far. Aoba47 ( talk) 15:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Comments –
Source Review: Only some small points. -- Pres N 18:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [4]. reply
I was lurking around looking for a mini-project and stumbled on this little number. Some interesting stories, and a fascinating glimpse of how the world powers in cricket have swung since the 1980s. As always, thanks in advance to anyone prepared to take the time to review this, I will endeavour to get to any and all comments as soon as practicable. Cheers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Harrias talk 07:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Bloom6132 ( talk) 21:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Initial comments after a cursory look; might add more later –
— Bloom6132 ( talk) 20:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Final comments –
— Bloom6132 ( talk) 17:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Hi TRM, some of these are only suggestions. Some bits confused me so I may have got my wires crossed.
That's all. Thanks. JennyOz ( talk) 16:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC) [5]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because Cate Blanchett is one of the best actresses of all time and probably the best of her generation. Her list deserves to be celebrated, much like her films and achievements. I feel it meets the FL criteria. Looking forward to lots of feedback on this. Krish | Talk 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC) reply
That's about it from me. I do recommend a thorough source review for the list. Krish, good job on taking an initiative to get Cate Balnchett's filmography and stage work list this far. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Hmm...
More to follow... ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 09:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Let me know once they are done. I will return after three days. ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 06:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Fine work Krish, this is one of best written introductions that I've read here. The first two paragraphs sure are. Good job. Numerounovedant Talk 17:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Source review –
Of the 3 citations I spot-checked, I found issues with 2 of them (ref 65 checked out fine), which is somewhat concerning. Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC) [6]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because after over 1,500 edits and over 500 references added I think I've finally brought it to FL quality. While this is a dynamic list, I firmly believe it contains as comprehensive a list of all notable persons who can be reliably sourced to have died from overdose or acute intoxication as is currently possible. In populating this list I have decided to be as inclusive as possible so as to not be accused of overlooking anybody. I anticipate several people on the list will be challenged, and have no issues with anyone being removed if their cause of death is deemed to not clearly meet the criteria. Freikorp ( talk) 13:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment - Just a quick comment, since this list is about people who died, I think it would benefit the article to have a small image gallery of some of the most famous people on this list, and remove the picture showing an injection of heroin. Mattximus ( talk) 22:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Oppose – at the moment, this list falls well short of our ??Featured list criteria in my opinion. Particularly with regards to the thoroughness of the referencing, and the sortability of the table. Ialso think that on a list of this size, the lead could be more substantial; specifically with regards to providing more global statistics, and simply a bit more background – is there anything about why this is such a common cause of death? Harrias talk 12:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
! scope="row" |
is used in the table to define the row scope, while ! scope="col" |
does the same for the column headers.
Harrias
talk
14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
reply|agency=
parameter of the citation template, but as I say, you're right that it is less important than when there is a named author.
Harrias
talk
14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
reply
Oppose The biggest problem is defining the scope.
Support Quite strongly. While there are always nitpicks and each of us has preferences, this list is quite important. Very simply, there is no other list like it anywhere on the Internet. This is Wikipedia at its finest. Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 22:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Ok, looks a lot better. One outstanding problem is the note on tramadol, which comes from the opinion of one pathologist. There must be some stats somewhere we can use instead. I'd dispute the fact as well (about tramadol) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Okay...in which case, tentative support (an ambitious and interesting list to put together. Good luck) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Support: Syntax looks fine to me but I would get rid of the "Ref" column and instead put the reference on the cause of death. I would also recommend using Template:sfn for citing books or journals for the convenience of the reader looking for data to cite. Vami IV ( talk) 06:42, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
Comments This was an ambitious list to improve, and I'm sure that, when it's promoted, it will set the standard for similar lists.
A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 10:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 23:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments Apologies for my absence. Like Freikorp says, I will support this list, but I do have some final comments.
A Thousand Doors ( talk | contribs) 12:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC) reply
|
WriterArtistDC, Harrias, the list has been substantially improved since your comments, would you please re-visit your oppositions and either confirm you still oppose or strike/support please? Thanks. The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
A Thousand Doors, please double-check your concerns have been addressed and respond here if at all possible. Many thanks. The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [10]. reply
After a much-needed overhaul to Wikipedia's Pokémon listing, the main page for these eight articles (this list plus the seven sub-lists) now covers the basics of what these creatures are. Given the sheer number of Pokémon (802 as of the release of Sun and Moon in 2016), all of them could not be reasonably contained within a single list. This article covers the names of each Pokémon as well as some background behind their creation and design. It is primarily designed as a hub-list to redirect users to the seven more detailed sub-lists that are divided by generation. The table used for the Pokémon is a bit atypical and uses seven columns to divide the names rather than one obnoxiously long list with over 800 rows. It forgoes sorbability for the sake of accessibility and ease of reading. I believe this list to cover all that is necessary for it as more in-depth information is better handed in either the dedicated lists by generation and/or articles on the Pokémon themselves. Thank you in advance for your comments, criticism, and time! ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 17:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Otherwise it all looks reasonably good. I like the format you've used with the subpages. Harrias talk 07:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Overall, this list is very well written. My major gripes can be taken care of by taking the following steps: introduce and explain the idea of evolution, and of alternate forms (including Mega Evolution etc) in the second paragraph of "Conception". Then, in the first paragraph of "Design" use Generation VI's French influence as an example of regional influences in the creatures' design. Lastly, rewrite the second paragraph of the lead to be a general summary of the two body sections.
Excellent work on this list! You have come up with a creative solution to the unique problem of listing all Pokemon, and I like the result. This is quality work, and I am excited to see that it has been nominated at FLC! -- haha169 ( talk) 10:29, 22 June 2017
Good work on the list! I hope to see the generations lists here as well at some point, I love the new colors. -- Pres N 20:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I had a look over this list last week and could not see anything major wrong with it, as a result im happy to Support its promotion to FL. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC) [11]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it has been significantly reworked from its original state, and now I am convinced it is perfectly FL-worthy. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Comments Support –
Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N 14:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC) [12]. reply
We probably know American recording artist Madonna as an entertainer, musician, provocative artist who has pushed the boundaries of popular music. However, she has ventured into the world of books and as an author even wrote children's books (surprise!). This list has all the books she has written (or given foreword) and is an exhaustive collection. With the consensus of my fellow editors I would like this one to become a featured bibliography list, the first of its kind for a musician. — IB [ Poke ] 09:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC) reply
@ IndianBio: I think that is an overdetail to mention the background about Maverick company after is already mentioned in the main article and we have a link to know about this company. But what do you think?. Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 13:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Wonderful work with this list. These are the primary notes that I saw while reading through it. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 ( talk) 14:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply
A few problems, should be easy:
Closing as promoted. -- Pres N 14:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC) [13]. reply
Moonlight is a 2016 American drama about a young African-American gay man struggling with his sexuality. It won numerous awards including the Academy Award for Best Picture. This list covers these, as always look forward to all the helpful and constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob ( talk) 14:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Comments by Mymis
|
---|
Mymis ( talk) 01:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply
|