The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 20:56, 28 October 2008 [1].
previous FLC (20:26, 11 October 2008)
Immediate renomination because I feel that reviewers' concerns were all addressed in the previous FLC, and I don't see why this list shouldn't be promoted.
Pandacomics ( talk) 18:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Comment List should probably be renamed to List of awards and nominations received by S.H.E. Gary King ( talk) 18:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:31, 28 October 2008 [3].
I am nominating this List for FL status. It is comprehensive, interesting, researched and clearly covers its subject area. Thank you. Yachtsman1 ( talk) 08:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 09:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Need to be more elaborate.
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:31, 28 October 2008 [4].
The article lists all the New York Mets managers starting in 1962 when the franchise began. I believe that this list meets the FL criteria.-- Black Watch 21 02:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Killervogel5
Oppose from Killervogel5
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [5].
The list contains important information and is very pleasing esthetically. It might suffer improvement if in addition the list would be sorted by author. Tusbra ( talk) 22:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 02:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Quick-fail This article needs significant work. It does not have a lead and is little more than a list of links. The list does not follow style guidelines (i.e. headings, en dashes in year ranges) and has a dearth of references. The references that are present need to be formatted. Sorry to be blunt, but this list is nowhere near Featured standards. Dabomb87 ( talk) 02:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [6].
This list lists the New York State Symbols Juthani1 t c s 00:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 02:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [7].
I nominated this four months ago. It was archived even with two supports and no opposes. Anyways, I have cleaned it up further, and it should be good to go once more! Gary King ( talk) 20:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
I know that education-related lists are difficult to make comprehensive – see the way I tried to demonstrate comprehensiveness on a previous nomination – but I'm having difficulty accepting, at present, that so few people from this university are notable in almost 100 years of history. Bencherlite Talk 18:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [8].
For the contest, but I've been working on this one a while. So, someone finally told me that #tag has been updated so that you CAN nest refs. So I had a happy happy happy time this weekend, finally able to create a clean article without using letters. (You can see why it mattered; there are more than 26 each of notes and cites!) The only thing I'm concerned about at this moment is the paragraph explaining the history of the land; I'm not sure anymore if I should go all the way back, or just go as far back as the last whole entity that contained the territory, which in this case would be 1863, New Mexico Territory. After all, before then, the identity of the land had nothing to do with Arizona Territory. So I'm thinking about removing the "see the list of governors of Sonora and Alta California", and some of the detail of how the land came to be, especially since the list of Sonora governors doesn't go nearly far enough back. But beyond this, I think it's featurable. -- Golbez ( talk) 04:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 05:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [9].
My first entry as part of the FL contest. I'm taking a somewhat odd approach to the lead, as it's an overview of the team's history, rather than the usual statistical information. Thanks for the comments, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
You should've peer reviewed this article first before you nominate it. --
SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.
24
[c]
03:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Crzy cheetah 03:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [10].
This list is part of the FLC Contest. I think it fulfills the featured list criteria.— Chris! c t 20:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- S R X 20:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose Quite a number of problems.
Colin° Talk 20:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
(outdent). The new source ( alacrastore) currently lists 116 acquisitions since 1986, not its founding as stated in the article. In addition, I don't see anything in that source to indicate these are indirect acquisitions as stated in the article. The brief summary of each news item in the alacrastore source indicates whether the acquisition was for an undisclosed amount or for a value -- but you have to pay to see what the value was. So, for example, Tower's amount was disclosed. The lead remains almost completely original research and even if the 116 figure was accurate, it would need an "As of XXX" prefix as it is likely to become inaccurate in a few weeks. Aside from whether the table has all the entries, the value and date columns aren't comprehensive, though probably could become so if an editor had access to a paid financial service. I suspect that providing a comprehensive and detailed list of acquisitions for a company like HP is beyond the means of amateur WP editors. Colin° Talk 21:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Sorry but, to add on to what is mentioned above, the list is also missing several acquisitions, only from within the past ten years no less. Considering the company has been around for over fifty years, there might be more out there. Some missing acquisitions include:
Gary King ( talk) 03:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply
There must be more that I missed.
Gary King (
talk)
02:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
To reviewers: I have addressed most of them. I will addressed the rest of them tomorrow. Thanks—
Chris!
c
t
04:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I've perfected the list and I believe it now fulfills the FL criteria. Thanks— Chris! c t 01:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Scorpion 0422 18:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe this list holds a lengthy and accurate coverage of The Living End's discography, and adheres with Wikipedia's rules for FLC nomination. If you do deny, please provide some points to improve the list. kiac ( talk) 12:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Let me know my talk page when these are done. Gary King ( talk) 18:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Underneath-it-All ( talk) 03:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose mainly by the poor layout, I suggest that you take a look in The Mars Volta discography for some ideas. This list is also a lack of references to music videos section, and several redundancies. Canniba loki 23:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I have no opposition if you don't use these, I just think they're more efficient. Shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 02:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [13].
This list appears to cover all of the main points and the main aspects of the FL critera. ISD ( talk) 19:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [14].
I have recently re-written this list and split it from the main David Bowie article. I think the article could be good enough to be a Featured List. -- JD554 ( talk) 10:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose Based on the above comments and specifically because every single item is listed in the lead. It looks really, really bad; I can't fathom why it was decided to do that.
Gary King (
talk)
21:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [15].
Inspired by FL: List of Castlevania titles, I completely remade the list from it's pitiful former state. G.A.S of the WikiProject Anime and manga suggested, after I requested a reassessment, to nominate the list as featured candidate. It is my first nomination. -- Goodraise ( talk) 19:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
Gary King ( talk) 21:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [16].
previous FLC (09:21, 25 August 2008)
Is this list ready to be featured? Nergaal ( talk) 17:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments
Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 16:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 02:57, 20 October 2008 [17].
previous FLC (16:14, 8 May 2008)
In the words of Violette Bellflower/Pirouette Passiflore:
“ | Rule #4 of good writing: It takes a lot of rewriting and rethinking. | ” |
And, after long weeks and months of figuring it out, here I am, about to start what could possibly be my first (and maybe only) featured or good topic. I'm 96% sure that everything has been addressed from the PRs and last FLC.
To borrow a little something from Reginald Lewis: " Why should Simpsons freaks and anime geeks have all the fun?" Well, I'm finally about to take you all on.
Now, give me a triple crown... -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I was not able to evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 21:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 15:40, 15 October 2008 [18].
I think this list meets the FL criteria, has images, sources, etc. DeFaultRyan ( talk) 19:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 21:54, 13 October 2008 [19].
I think this list meets all of the criteria and is ready to be featured. I will, of course, try to fix any issues raised here, if any exist. Garden. 21:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Thanks. Sunderland06 ( talk) 22:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Gary King ( talk) 22:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Boissière ( talk) 19:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:30, 13 October 2008 [20].
It has a solid, well-referenced lead section. The lead is the most comprehensive of the NFL Expansion Draft lists. The list is complete, easy to navigate, and looks good.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 08:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed word to "listed."-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Replaced with "could not list players" to keep uniform with explanation of process.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed to "portion," but see dictionary definition of Proration.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed to "portion," but see dictionary definition of Proration.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fleshed out the intro.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fleshed out the intro.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) -- S R X 00:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed pipelink.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Removed extra link.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Missed that one, it is changed to "listed." -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 02:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I added a short explanation and changed the link to point to the NFL section of the main salary cap article.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 02:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, now I see it. The second one removed.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I moved the youtube videos to another sentence. I included them, see the article in LonlyGirl for an example of using youtube videos as references. It is useful for readers to actually be able to watch the draft itself on video. You can't get a better reference than seeing it live with your own eyes. We use pictures, etc all the time.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, they are moved to an External Links section and not used as specific references other than two instances: that the draft was broadcast on ESPN (I can't find any other direct support for that statement), and that there were 25 Pro Bowl players among the initial list (that was said on the video but not in any other reference).-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Split the references into General and Specific sections as done in 2001 NFL Draft. Doing them like 2008 WWE Draft screws up the table's sortability. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done But do look at the featured lists 2001 NFL Draft and 2007 NFL Draft-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Logo removed. And this is the complete expansion draft for that year. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I have expanded the lead somewhat more, just not in the two ways previously suggested, mostly I have added references.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Oppose reply
Done I changed it to a logo with a valid fair use rationale. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Not done This is common practice across all Project NFL pages, not just this one.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, leading zeros removed.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 08:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Gary King ( talk) 05:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Dabomb87 ( talk) 12:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I had called the specific references "Notes," modeled after the FL 2001 NFL Draft page, but I changed it like the Lakers page instead.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Done Changed, but please note that the all caps came from the original source. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [21].
I am nominating this list because I think is ready to achieve FL status. Jaespinoza ( talk) 19:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose Comments because of the items below
Gary King (
talk)
06:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [22].
Nominating another episode list. sephiroth bcr ( converse) 02:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note that I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [23].
Very well constructed list, clear and concise with a good use of colours and maps. I think it definitely good enough for an FL. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 01:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
You might get a native English-speaker to help. Tony (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [24].
And here's another chapter list (well, I've only done four, so this one is a harder line to throw out. Damn you Gary for making me want to do short nomination statements! :p) sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I did not check the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 18:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC) replyComments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [25].
I'm nominating this article, because I think it has reached FL status. This is what the article looked like prior to my working on it. Since then, I've re-written and reformatted most of the article, added relevant pics and template(s), and corrected POV and trivia sections. It was also peer reviewed. The article is now well referenced, comprehensive and aesthetically pleasing. If there are any minor issues remaining, I'd be willing to work on them, until the article reaches FL status. -- Flewis (talk) 07:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [30].
And here's another episode list. sephiroth bcr ( converse) 06:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [31].
The map was created by Matthewedwards! Thanks! Gary King ( talk) 04:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak Support
-- K. Annoyomous 24 [c] 23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [32].
previous FLC (16:20, 18 August 2008)
Table issues from previous FLC were finally resolved. Nominating the list for a third time because, again, I believe it fits FL criteria. Pandacomics ( talk) 06:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - unable to evaluate the non-English sources for reliablity. Link checker tool shows several dead links. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 05:44, 4 October 2008 [34].
I think this list meets all the criteria for FL and I think it would be useful to get a college basketball season article as a FL so it can act as a template for other such lists. Remember ( talk) 17:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong Oppose
-- S R X 01:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 05:44, 4 October 2008 [35].
I've been working on this list for quite sometime and I must say it has greatly improved from its state some weeks ago. The citations are formatted nicely and the programming history has been expanded, and everything that needs to be cited is cited. – Howard the Duck 17:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
PS: This series only has 2 seasons yet. I dunno the exact parameters on when to divide to a Gossip Girl (season 2) subarticle but if it needs to be divided w/o sacrificing this FLC I'll do it. – Howard the Duck 17:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 18:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
RTitle=
field. Were the episode titles given on screen? If so, you don't need to reference them at all. Even if they weren't, you could instead use
http://www.tvguide.com/detail/tv-show.aspx?tvobjectid=288136&more=ucepisodelist, from
TV Guide, and put the reference in the table header, next to "Episode title"Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 08:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Sorry, Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 07:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 16:39, 2 October 2008 [36].
previous FLC (16:01, 11 September 2008)
Last one failed because of a lack of comments (hint). Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments all issues resolved; from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs). Hint taken ;)
Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC) reply
format=PDF
field should be added to the templates.-- Crzy cheetah 20:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Looks fine. I conditionally support this FLC. -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 18:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments Oppose
Gary King ( talk) 03:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 15:15, 1 October 2008 [37].
This list has come a really long way since it first started and I believe it to be fully comprehensive and well-referenced --Thanks, Hadseys 19:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
* MB - CS Mackay-Bennett (bodies 1-306) * M - CS Minia (bodies 307-323) * MM - CGS Montmagny (bodies 326-329) * A - SS Algerine (body 330) * O - RMS Oceanic (bodies 331-333) * I - SS Ilford (body 334) * OT - SS Ottowa (body 335)
- should also be in the key
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 20:56, 28 October 2008 [1].
previous FLC (20:26, 11 October 2008)
Immediate renomination because I feel that reviewers' concerns were all addressed in the previous FLC, and I don't see why this list shouldn't be promoted.
Pandacomics ( talk) 18:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Comment List should probably be renamed to List of awards and nominations received by S.H.E. Gary King ( talk) 18:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:31, 28 October 2008 [3].
I am nominating this List for FL status. It is comprehensive, interesting, researched and clearly covers its subject area. Thank you. Yachtsman1 ( talk) 08:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 09:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Need to be more elaborate.
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:31, 28 October 2008 [4].
The article lists all the New York Mets managers starting in 1962 when the franchise began. I believe that this list meets the FL criteria.-- Black Watch 21 02:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Killervogel5
Oppose from Killervogel5
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [5].
The list contains important information and is very pleasing esthetically. It might suffer improvement if in addition the list would be sorted by author. Tusbra ( talk) 22:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 02:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Quick-fail This article needs significant work. It does not have a lead and is little more than a list of links. The list does not follow style guidelines (i.e. headings, en dashes in year ranges) and has a dearth of references. The references that are present need to be formatted. Sorry to be blunt, but this list is nowhere near Featured standards. Dabomb87 ( talk) 02:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [6].
This list lists the New York State Symbols Juthani1 t c s 00:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 02:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [7].
I nominated this four months ago. It was archived even with two supports and no opposes. Anyways, I have cleaned it up further, and it should be good to go once more! Gary King ( talk) 20:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
I know that education-related lists are difficult to make comprehensive – see the way I tried to demonstrate comprehensiveness on a previous nomination – but I'm having difficulty accepting, at present, that so few people from this university are notable in almost 100 years of history. Bencherlite Talk 18:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [8].
For the contest, but I've been working on this one a while. So, someone finally told me that #tag has been updated so that you CAN nest refs. So I had a happy happy happy time this weekend, finally able to create a clean article without using letters. (You can see why it mattered; there are more than 26 each of notes and cites!) The only thing I'm concerned about at this moment is the paragraph explaining the history of the land; I'm not sure anymore if I should go all the way back, or just go as far back as the last whole entity that contained the territory, which in this case would be 1863, New Mexico Territory. After all, before then, the identity of the land had nothing to do with Arizona Territory. So I'm thinking about removing the "see the list of governors of Sonora and Alta California", and some of the detail of how the land came to be, especially since the list of Sonora governors doesn't go nearly far enough back. But beyond this, I think it's featurable. -- Golbez ( talk) 04:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 05:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [9].
My first entry as part of the FL contest. I'm taking a somewhat odd approach to the lead, as it's an overview of the team's history, rather than the usual statistical information. Thanks for the comments, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
You should've peer reviewed this article first before you nominate it. --
SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.
24
[c]
03:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Crzy cheetah 03:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 15:52, 25 October 2008 [10].
This list is part of the FLC Contest. I think it fulfills the featured list criteria.— Chris! c t 20:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- S R X 20:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose Quite a number of problems.
Colin° Talk 20:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
(outdent). The new source ( alacrastore) currently lists 116 acquisitions since 1986, not its founding as stated in the article. In addition, I don't see anything in that source to indicate these are indirect acquisitions as stated in the article. The brief summary of each news item in the alacrastore source indicates whether the acquisition was for an undisclosed amount or for a value -- but you have to pay to see what the value was. So, for example, Tower's amount was disclosed. The lead remains almost completely original research and even if the 116 figure was accurate, it would need an "As of XXX" prefix as it is likely to become inaccurate in a few weeks. Aside from whether the table has all the entries, the value and date columns aren't comprehensive, though probably could become so if an editor had access to a paid financial service. I suspect that providing a comprehensive and detailed list of acquisitions for a company like HP is beyond the means of amateur WP editors. Colin° Talk 21:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Sorry but, to add on to what is mentioned above, the list is also missing several acquisitions, only from within the past ten years no less. Considering the company has been around for over fifty years, there might be more out there. Some missing acquisitions include:
Gary King ( talk) 03:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply
There must be more that I missed.
Gary King (
talk)
02:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
To reviewers: I have addressed most of them. I will addressed the rest of them tomorrow. Thanks—
Chris!
c
t
04:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I've perfected the list and I believe it now fulfills the FL criteria. Thanks— Chris! c t 01:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Scorpion 0422 18:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe this list holds a lengthy and accurate coverage of The Living End's discography, and adheres with Wikipedia's rules for FLC nomination. If you do deny, please provide some points to improve the list. kiac ( talk) 12:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Let me know my talk page when these are done. Gary King ( talk) 18:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Underneath-it-All ( talk) 03:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose mainly by the poor layout, I suggest that you take a look in The Mars Volta discography for some ideas. This list is also a lack of references to music videos section, and several redundancies. Canniba loki 23:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I have no opposition if you don't use these, I just think they're more efficient. Shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 02:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [13].
This list appears to cover all of the main points and the main aspects of the FL critera. ISD ( talk) 19:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [14].
I have recently re-written this list and split it from the main David Bowie article. I think the article could be good enough to be a Featured List. -- JD554 ( talk) 10:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose Based on the above comments and specifically because every single item is listed in the lead. It looks really, really bad; I can't fathom why it was decided to do that.
Gary King (
talk)
21:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [15].
Inspired by FL: List of Castlevania titles, I completely remade the list from it's pitiful former state. G.A.S of the WikiProject Anime and manga suggested, after I requested a reassessment, to nominate the list as featured candidate. It is my first nomination. -- Goodraise ( talk) 19:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
Gary King ( talk) 21:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:15, 20 October 2008 [16].
previous FLC (09:21, 25 August 2008)
Is this list ready to be featured? Nergaal ( talk) 17:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments
Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 16:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 02:57, 20 October 2008 [17].
previous FLC (16:14, 8 May 2008)
In the words of Violette Bellflower/Pirouette Passiflore:
“ | Rule #4 of good writing: It takes a lot of rewriting and rethinking. | ” |
And, after long weeks and months of figuring it out, here I am, about to start what could possibly be my first (and maybe only) featured or good topic. I'm 96% sure that everything has been addressed from the PRs and last FLC.
To borrow a little something from Reginald Lewis: " Why should Simpsons freaks and anime geeks have all the fun?" Well, I'm finally about to take you all on.
Now, give me a triple crown... -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I was not able to evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 21:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 15:40, 15 October 2008 [18].
I think this list meets the FL criteria, has images, sources, etc. DeFaultRyan ( talk) 19:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 21:54, 13 October 2008 [19].
I think this list meets all of the criteria and is ready to be featured. I will, of course, try to fix any issues raised here, if any exist. Garden. 21:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Thanks. Sunderland06 ( talk) 22:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Gary King ( talk) 22:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Boissière ( talk) 19:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 03:30, 13 October 2008 [20].
It has a solid, well-referenced lead section. The lead is the most comprehensive of the NFL Expansion Draft lists. The list is complete, easy to navigate, and looks good.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 08:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed word to "listed."-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Replaced with "could not list players" to keep uniform with explanation of process.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed to "portion," but see dictionary definition of Proration.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Changed to "portion," but see dictionary definition of Proration.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fleshed out the intro.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fleshed out the intro.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) -- S R X 00:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed pipelink.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Removed extra link.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Missed that one, it is changed to "listed." -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 02:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I added a short explanation and changed the link to point to the NFL section of the main salary cap article.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 02:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, now I see it. The second one removed.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I moved the youtube videos to another sentence. I included them, see the article in LonlyGirl for an example of using youtube videos as references. It is useful for readers to actually be able to watch the draft itself on video. You can't get a better reference than seeing it live with your own eyes. We use pictures, etc all the time.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, they are moved to an External Links section and not used as specific references other than two instances: that the draft was broadcast on ESPN (I can't find any other direct support for that statement), and that there were 25 Pro Bowl players among the initial list (that was said on the video but not in any other reference).-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Split the references into General and Specific sections as done in 2001 NFL Draft. Doing them like 2008 WWE Draft screws up the table's sortability. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done But do look at the featured lists 2001 NFL Draft and 2007 NFL Draft-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Logo removed. And this is the complete expansion draft for that year. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I have expanded the lead somewhat more, just not in the two ways previously suggested, mostly I have added references.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Oppose reply
Done I changed it to a logo with a valid fair use rationale. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 05:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Not done This is common practice across all Project NFL pages, not just this one.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 07:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Ok, leading zeros removed.-- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 08:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Gary King ( talk) 05:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Dabomb87 ( talk) 12:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done Fixed.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I had called the specific references "Notes," modeled after the FL 2001 NFL Draft page, but I changed it like the Lakers page instead.-- User:2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Done Changed, but please note that the all caps came from the original source. -- 2008Olympian chitchat seemywork 17:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [21].
I am nominating this list because I think is ready to achieve FL status. Jaespinoza ( talk) 19:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose Comments because of the items below
Gary King (
talk)
06:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [22].
Nominating another episode list. sephiroth bcr ( converse) 02:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note that I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [23].
Very well constructed list, clear and concise with a good use of colours and maps. I think it definitely good enough for an FL. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 01:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
You might get a native English-speaker to help. Tony (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [24].
And here's another chapter list (well, I've only done four, so this one is a harder line to throw out. Damn you Gary for making me want to do short nomination statements! :p) sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I did not check the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 18:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC) replyComments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [25].
I'm nominating this article, because I think it has reached FL status. This is what the article looked like prior to my working on it. Since then, I've re-written and reformatted most of the article, added relevant pics and template(s), and corrected POV and trivia sections. It was also peer reviewed. The article is now well referenced, comprehensive and aesthetically pleasing. If there are any minor issues remaining, I'd be willing to work on them, until the article reaches FL status. -- Flewis (talk) 07:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [30].
And here's another episode list. sephiroth bcr ( converse) 06:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [31].
The map was created by Matthewedwards! Thanks! Gary King ( talk) 04:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak Support
-- K. Annoyomous 24 [c] 23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [32].
previous FLC (16:20, 18 August 2008)
Table issues from previous FLC were finally resolved. Nominating the list for a third time because, again, I believe it fits FL criteria. Pandacomics ( talk) 06:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - unable to evaluate the non-English sources for reliablity. Link checker tool shows several dead links. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 03:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 05:44, 4 October 2008 [34].
I think this list meets all the criteria for FL and I think it would be useful to get a college basketball season article as a FL so it can act as a template for other such lists. Remember ( talk) 17:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong Oppose
-- S R X 01:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 05:44, 4 October 2008 [35].
I've been working on this list for quite sometime and I must say it has greatly improved from its state some weeks ago. The citations are formatted nicely and the programming history has been expanded, and everything that needs to be cited is cited. – Howard the Duck 17:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
PS: This series only has 2 seasons yet. I dunno the exact parameters on when to divide to a Gossip Girl (season 2) subarticle but if it needs to be divided w/o sacrificing this FLC I'll do it. – Howard the Duck 17:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 18:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
RTitle=
field. Were the episode titles given on screen? If so, you don't need to reference them at all. Even if they weren't, you could instead use
http://www.tvguide.com/detail/tv-show.aspx?tvobjectid=288136&more=ucepisodelist, from
TV Guide, and put the reference in the table header, next to "Episode title"Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 08:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose
Sorry, Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 07:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 16:39, 2 October 2008 [36].
previous FLC (16:01, 11 September 2008)
Last one failed because of a lack of comments (hint). Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments all issues resolved; from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs). Hint taken ;)
Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC) reply
format=PDF
field should be added to the templates.-- Crzy cheetah 20:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Looks fine. I conditionally support this FLC. -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 18:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments Oppose
Gary King ( talk) 03:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 15:15, 1 October 2008 [37].
This list has come a really long way since it first started and I believe it to be fully comprehensive and well-referenced --Thanks, Hadseys 19:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC) reply
* MB - CS Mackay-Bennett (bodies 1-306) * M - CS Minia (bodies 307-323) * MM - CGS Montmagny (bodies 326-329) * A - SS Algerine (body 330) * O - RMS Oceanic (bodies 331-333) * I - SS Ilford (body 334) * OT - SS Ottowa (body 335)
- should also be in the key