The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:09, 31 May 2011 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel, in some aspects, that the list can be a featured list. I am willing to donate my time in fixing any problems that anyone will bring up here. Thanks, AJona1992 ( talk) 19:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:09, 31 May 2011 [2].
I am nominating this for featured list because it sufficiently lists notable UPLB people. Moray An Par ( talk) 15:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments on a first glance.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 15:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
Number of summa cum laudes updated to 2011 per The Rambling Man's request. Moray An Par ( talk) 16:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
! scope="row" | {{sortname|Nilo|Alcala}}
| Undergraduate || Development communication || [[Musical composer]] || <ref name='Nilo Alcala'>{{cite web | url = http://nilo_alcala2.webs.com/profile.htm | title = Nilo Belarmino Alcala II | publisher = Official website of Nilo Alcala | accessdate = 2011-04-21 }}</ref>
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [3].
This is a my second nomination for FL which is again of Asian Games related medal table [first one is still in process]. It is fully sourced and all concerns will be addressed by me, thanks. -- Bill william compton Talk 12:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments (strictly here as a reviewer, not a director)
The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Yeah, this is a tough break I think. You've done an excellent job on the main article, but there's really little justification (in my opinion) on carving out just the medal table for a possible FL. There's just not enough there to warrant an independent page at this time. I sympathise with your feelings about the 1896 list, but as StPby says, it's not a reasonable justification to say that's an FL so this one should be too. Standards have changed considerably since that particular list was promoted and I feel it would be dealt with similarly to this one. I know it's not what you want to hear, but right now I'd be tempted to move back to the main 1951 article which you've expanded drastically and head to FAC with it. And let me know when get there so I can help you with it! The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Withdraw – I formally withdraw this list from featured list's candidateship. I shouldn't have compared it with the 1896 Olympics list in the very first place. I apologize for my irrational conduct and wasting precious time of other users. Pardonne-moi
— Bill william compton
Talk
19:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [4].
I am nominating this for featured list because its lead section shows great writing skills, the lead section is well written and describes what the article is about, the article is easy to navigate, the article follows all the appropriate Manuel of Styles, and the article has visual appeal Michael Jester ( talk) 18:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
Overall there's a lot of very dodgy-referenced stuff here, especially the mixtapes. I wonder, if with all the non-notable stuff removed, this wouldn't be better placed at Wale#Discography. 1 album, 7 singles, and a few more music videos..? Seems to fail Criterion 3(b) as an unnecessary fork. All that plus the poor Lede means I have to Oppose at this time. Matthewedwards : Chat 05:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Have Matthew's concerns been addressed? If not this should be archived at this point. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [5].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe all issues raised by the previous FL nomination prior to my extended wikibreak were taken care of, unfortunately I went on a break thinking everything was done and it would be promoted. Another editor came with concerns while I was gone, I have addressed those that are addressable, other concerns that I found to be incorrect or impossible have not been fixed due to obvious reasons (ISBN is not possible to put for a 1880 source for example) or that I found nitpicky (location for publisher I find unneeded on sources; format of diagram I am not compromising by turning into a table). Camelbinky ( talk) 22:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick comments - the onus to prove reliability of questionable sources is on the nominator. I agree with Courcelles that (as a minimum) refs 4 and 5 need to be demonstrated to be reliable. How you achieve this is up to you, but if it's anticipated to take more than a couple of weeks, I suggest you find alternative sources which are reliable or withdraw the nomination. In other news...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
2- I believe I fixed all date formats, let me know if I missed one.
3-fixed
4-fixed
5-some images are smaller due to constraints on size of the timelines, if all images are made the same size they would have to be all the same as the smallest I suppose. Is that the best remedy?
6-Yes, there is an explanation of the dashed lines in the section in which dashed lines appear. I could add an explanation in the lede if that is prefered as well.
7-yes, chester is supposed to merge, can work on placing Chester so that is more apparent. Camelbinky ( talk) 21:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [6].
For your delectation: the discography of a fairly obscure metal band, without the bells and whistles you might find in the discog of a worldwide pop star or venerable rock group. Instead, it's a fairly warts-and-all account of Isis' release history, with minimal chart performance history, no worldwide sales counts and one or two silly and arcane early releases thrown in for good measure. Although it looks pretty bare, I like to think it's got all the bases well and truly covered. I eagerly await your feedback and will jump upon any recommendations with fervour. Thanks, Seegoon ( talk) 18:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Serious oppose - basics, suggest you withdraw until you've looked at......
The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comment Please increase text size of the notes. There's not so much that they can't be in normal size in the boxes. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Opening line: " Isis were an American post-metal band ..." Change to: " Isis was an American post-metal band" There is only ONE band that is discussed here. Jimknut ( talk) 15:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [7].
I am nominating this for featured list because I think after my edit and clean up to this article, it now meets the condition, it's highly configured and the tables are at their best, they are all have same size and all the charts have the reference much info added and templates re-created, I think it is now ready. Thanks Nima1024 ( talk) 10:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [8].
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the FL criteria. TGilmour ( talk) 13:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick fail I'm afraid, but some words of advice before that happens...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [9].
This is a list about all the episodes of the 10th season of The Simpsons. It doesn't have any problems that I can see.
~~ EBE123~~ talk Contribs 19:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments really quick ones.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [10].
I am nominating this for featured list because I have put a lot of work into it and I do think it should be a featured list KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 18:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Certifications are awarded for units shipped, not units sold. Therefore it is incorrect to list sales figures in the "Sales Based on Claims and Certification-Awards" column based on certs alone.— indopug ( talk) 05:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply More
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 15:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 22:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
Comments
Hey, this is regarding your comment while reviewing the BSB discography on FLC that NL, SWI, and GER should be changed according to ISO-3. I did what you said but another editor reverted my edit saying that this system is not used anymore. He kinda seems to be right as most discographies, including featured ones, seem to have SWI, GER, etc. So, should we leave it as it is or should I still change it? KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 20:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Then he's probably the one going around changing them. All the discog FLs I've done, I've been asked to do ISO-3 names as they're official. I've also seen other discog nominations being asked to make them ISO-3, as well as a discussion on a talk page somewhere at WP:DISCOG, perhaps the style page. Check out some of them from the date they were promoted, you'll likely find more. GER and SWI have no meaning and are simply wrong. but the thing is that small edits like changing DEU to GER and SUI to SWI won't flag people when they see the edit on their watchlist because no bytes have been added or removed, and so they end up being left that way. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
We always want to make sense when requiring for certain styles. SUI=suisse is in French, DEU=Deutschland is in German; in other words, if we are going to ask editors to post these two in their native languages, we might as well ask for all other markets be posted in their native languages including Finland which would be SUO=Suomen and not FIN, Sweden which would be SVE=Sverige and not SWE, Austria would be ÖST=Österreich and not AUT etc.. The country abbreviations are in English also at Discographies/style/samples. -- Harout72 ( talk) 22:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not too bad, but needs a bit of work. Oppose for now. Please ping my talk page for a revisit. Matthewedwards : Chat 05:26, 23 April 2011 (UTC) Additional reply
Matthewedwards : Chat 21:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [11].
I would like to put this list forward for consideration as a Featured List because I believe it cover the topic accurately & fully and meets the Featured List Criteria. I also believe I have dealt with all points raised in the closed peer review. It's very much based on the List of ISS spacewalks. Many thanks in advance to any reviewers! Colds7ream ( talk) 12:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment An interesting list on an area I know very little about..
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments I have to say it's really good to see some niche lists here, welcome!
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comment: Apologies for taking so long to look at your list, but I hope I can be helpful. Improving the accessibility of an article isn't an "all-or-nothing = pass/fail" process, so I hope you'll understand that my comments are mainly suggestions, not requirements for my support (apart from a couple of things like column headers and alternate text).
! scope="col"
. See
MOS:ACCESS#Data tables for the guidance.! scope="row"
. If you're unsure, I've made a short version of your table at
User:RexxS/Mir spacewalks#Minimal markup, where I've stripped out all of the visual formatting and added the header markup, as well as the dagger template, so you can see what I've done.If you'd like to try out any or all of these suggested changes (you really need to do the column headers), but are unsure, I'm happy to help – either in doing some for you, or in helping if you get into difficulties while trying them out. I know the reviewers here won't complain if the list gets a few edits as a result; improving accessibility doesn't reduce the stability of an article! Hope that helps, -- RexxS ( talk) 19:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC) reply
# | Mission | Spacewalkers | Start ( UTC) | End (UTC) | Duration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rowspan=2 |1 |
EO-2 EVA 1 † |
Yury Romanenko Aleksandr Laveykin |
11 April 1987 19:41 |
11 April 1987 23:21 |
3 hours, 40 minutes |
Inspected the rear port of the core module following the failure of Kvant-1 to achieve a successful hard docking on 9 April and discovered a piece of debris left behind following the departure of Progress 28 on 27 March. This was removed, and the subsequent hard docking of the new module was observed. [1] [2] [3] |
# | Mission | Spacewalkers | Start ( UTC) | End (UTC) | Duration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
EO-2 EVA 1 † |
Yury Romanenko Aleksandr Laveykin |
11 April 1987 19:41 |
11 April 1987 23:21 |
3 hours, 40 minutes |
Inspected the rear port of the core module following the failure of Kvant-1 to achieve a successful hard docking on 9 April and discovered a piece of debris left behind following the departure of Progress 28 on 27 March. This was removed, and the subsequent hard docking of the new module was observed. [1] [2] [3] |
Comments:
bamse ( talk) 19:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:14, 10 May 2011 [12].
I am nominating this for featured list because, although it's been a while since I brought a list here I think that this one is ready to become featured and hopefully meets all of the criteria. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit ( talk) 18:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Cheetah (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comments from EdgeNavidad ( Talk · Contribs) 18:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Oppose For lack of
verifiability of the team column. Will change to support once acceptable source for the teams is found. (The current source only shows that the riders rode for the displayed team at a certain point during the year, not that they rode for the team during the Giro.) See discussion below.
|
Resolved comments from Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) |
---|
*Original comments 12:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 23:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 15:42, 10 May 2011 [14].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all FL criteria. Article has been based on a similar FL article, List of FIFA World Cup finals. Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 09:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
Chamal T• C 14:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
There are quite a lot more prose issues, and overall the prose is not written to a very professional level. If you can address the points above, and leave me a message on my talk page, I'll put up some more points, and we'll try and get the writing up to a better standard (although my own writing is often full of redundancies and the such). Harrias talk 12:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments – In addition to the ones above, I found these things:
Withdraw - Theres been a pile up of comments and I dont see myself attending to all these queries as fast as I should during an FLC. Thanks to all those who gave their input, apologies for bringing this in and not devoting time to it. Thanks also to The Rambling Man for the reminders, I just have too much on my plate at the moment, I should have withdrawn this earlier. The comments will help myself (or another editor for that matter) take things into A/c before the list comes back for a second nom (which I hope will happen sometime). Cheers, Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 15:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:08, 2 May 2011 [15].
I am nominating this for featured list because...
This list is based on both Major League Baseball, collegiate football, and collegiate basketball FLs. Even though this is my first FL nomination, I have gone over the FL criteria numerous times. NorthTechsan ( talk) 23:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:09, 31 May 2011 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel, in some aspects, that the list can be a featured list. I am willing to donate my time in fixing any problems that anyone will bring up here. Thanks, AJona1992 ( talk) 19:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:09, 31 May 2011 [2].
I am nominating this for featured list because it sufficiently lists notable UPLB people. Moray An Par ( talk) 15:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments on a first glance.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 15:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
Number of summa cum laudes updated to 2011 per The Rambling Man's request. Moray An Par ( talk) 16:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
! scope="row" | {{sortname|Nilo|Alcala}}
| Undergraduate || Development communication || [[Musical composer]] || <ref name='Nilo Alcala'>{{cite web | url = http://nilo_alcala2.webs.com/profile.htm | title = Nilo Belarmino Alcala II | publisher = Official website of Nilo Alcala | accessdate = 2011-04-21 }}</ref>
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [3].
This is a my second nomination for FL which is again of Asian Games related medal table [first one is still in process]. It is fully sourced and all concerns will be addressed by me, thanks. -- Bill william compton Talk 12:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments (strictly here as a reviewer, not a director)
The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Yeah, this is a tough break I think. You've done an excellent job on the main article, but there's really little justification (in my opinion) on carving out just the medal table for a possible FL. There's just not enough there to warrant an independent page at this time. I sympathise with your feelings about the 1896 list, but as StPby says, it's not a reasonable justification to say that's an FL so this one should be too. Standards have changed considerably since that particular list was promoted and I feel it would be dealt with similarly to this one. I know it's not what you want to hear, but right now I'd be tempted to move back to the main 1951 article which you've expanded drastically and head to FAC with it. And let me know when get there so I can help you with it! The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Withdraw – I formally withdraw this list from featured list's candidateship. I shouldn't have compared it with the 1896 Olympics list in the very first place. I apologize for my irrational conduct and wasting precious time of other users. Pardonne-moi
— Bill william compton
Talk
19:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [4].
I am nominating this for featured list because its lead section shows great writing skills, the lead section is well written and describes what the article is about, the article is easy to navigate, the article follows all the appropriate Manuel of Styles, and the article has visual appeal Michael Jester ( talk) 18:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
Overall there's a lot of very dodgy-referenced stuff here, especially the mixtapes. I wonder, if with all the non-notable stuff removed, this wouldn't be better placed at Wale#Discography. 1 album, 7 singles, and a few more music videos..? Seems to fail Criterion 3(b) as an unnecessary fork. All that plus the poor Lede means I have to Oppose at this time. Matthewedwards : Chat 05:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Have Matthew's concerns been addressed? If not this should be archived at this point. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [5].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe all issues raised by the previous FL nomination prior to my extended wikibreak were taken care of, unfortunately I went on a break thinking everything was done and it would be promoted. Another editor came with concerns while I was gone, I have addressed those that are addressable, other concerns that I found to be incorrect or impossible have not been fixed due to obvious reasons (ISBN is not possible to put for a 1880 source for example) or that I found nitpicky (location for publisher I find unneeded on sources; format of diagram I am not compromising by turning into a table). Camelbinky ( talk) 22:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick comments - the onus to prove reliability of questionable sources is on the nominator. I agree with Courcelles that (as a minimum) refs 4 and 5 need to be demonstrated to be reliable. How you achieve this is up to you, but if it's anticipated to take more than a couple of weeks, I suggest you find alternative sources which are reliable or withdraw the nomination. In other news...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
2- I believe I fixed all date formats, let me know if I missed one.
3-fixed
4-fixed
5-some images are smaller due to constraints on size of the timelines, if all images are made the same size they would have to be all the same as the smallest I suppose. Is that the best remedy?
6-Yes, there is an explanation of the dashed lines in the section in which dashed lines appear. I could add an explanation in the lede if that is prefered as well.
7-yes, chester is supposed to merge, can work on placing Chester so that is more apparent. Camelbinky ( talk) 21:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 24 May 2011 [6].
For your delectation: the discography of a fairly obscure metal band, without the bells and whistles you might find in the discog of a worldwide pop star or venerable rock group. Instead, it's a fairly warts-and-all account of Isis' release history, with minimal chart performance history, no worldwide sales counts and one or two silly and arcane early releases thrown in for good measure. Although it looks pretty bare, I like to think it's got all the bases well and truly covered. I eagerly await your feedback and will jump upon any recommendations with fervour. Thanks, Seegoon ( talk) 18:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Serious oppose - basics, suggest you withdraw until you've looked at......
The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comment Please increase text size of the notes. There's not so much that they can't be in normal size in the boxes. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Opening line: " Isis were an American post-metal band ..." Change to: " Isis was an American post-metal band" There is only ONE band that is discussed here. Jimknut ( talk) 15:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [7].
I am nominating this for featured list because I think after my edit and clean up to this article, it now meets the condition, it's highly configured and the tables are at their best, they are all have same size and all the charts have the reference much info added and templates re-created, I think it is now ready. Thanks Nima1024 ( talk) 10:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [8].
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the FL criteria. TGilmour ( talk) 13:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Quick fail I'm afraid, but some words of advice before that happens...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [9].
This is a list about all the episodes of the 10th season of The Simpsons. It doesn't have any problems that I can see.
~~ EBE123~~ talk Contribs 19:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments really quick ones.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [10].
I am nominating this for featured list because I have put a lot of work into it and I do think it should be a featured list KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 18:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Certifications are awarded for units shipped, not units sold. Therefore it is incorrect to list sales figures in the "Sales Based on Claims and Certification-Awards" column based on certs alone.— indopug ( talk) 05:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply More
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 15:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 22:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
Comments
Hey, this is regarding your comment while reviewing the BSB discography on FLC that NL, SWI, and GER should be changed according to ISO-3. I did what you said but another editor reverted my edit saying that this system is not used anymore. He kinda seems to be right as most discographies, including featured ones, seem to have SWI, GER, etc. So, should we leave it as it is or should I still change it? KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 20:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Then he's probably the one going around changing them. All the discog FLs I've done, I've been asked to do ISO-3 names as they're official. I've also seen other discog nominations being asked to make them ISO-3, as well as a discussion on a talk page somewhere at WP:DISCOG, perhaps the style page. Check out some of them from the date they were promoted, you'll likely find more. GER and SWI have no meaning and are simply wrong. but the thing is that small edits like changing DEU to GER and SUI to SWI won't flag people when they see the edit on their watchlist because no bytes have been added or removed, and so they end up being left that way. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
We always want to make sense when requiring for certain styles. SUI=suisse is in French, DEU=Deutschland is in German; in other words, if we are going to ask editors to post these two in their native languages, we might as well ask for all other markets be posted in their native languages including Finland which would be SUO=Suomen and not FIN, Sweden which would be SVE=Sverige and not SWE, Austria would be ÖST=Österreich and not AUT etc.. The country abbreviations are in English also at Discographies/style/samples. -- Harout72 ( talk) 22:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not too bad, but needs a bit of work. Oppose for now. Please ping my talk page for a revisit. Matthewedwards : Chat 05:26, 23 April 2011 (UTC) Additional reply
Matthewedwards : Chat 21:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 18:21, 17 May 2011 [11].
I would like to put this list forward for consideration as a Featured List because I believe it cover the topic accurately & fully and meets the Featured List Criteria. I also believe I have dealt with all points raised in the closed peer review. It's very much based on the List of ISS spacewalks. Many thanks in advance to any reviewers! Colds7ream ( talk) 12:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment An interesting list on an area I know very little about..
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments I have to say it's really good to see some niche lists here, welcome!
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comment: Apologies for taking so long to look at your list, but I hope I can be helpful. Improving the accessibility of an article isn't an "all-or-nothing = pass/fail" process, so I hope you'll understand that my comments are mainly suggestions, not requirements for my support (apart from a couple of things like column headers and alternate text).
! scope="col"
. See
MOS:ACCESS#Data tables for the guidance.! scope="row"
. If you're unsure, I've made a short version of your table at
User:RexxS/Mir spacewalks#Minimal markup, where I've stripped out all of the visual formatting and added the header markup, as well as the dagger template, so you can see what I've done.If you'd like to try out any or all of these suggested changes (you really need to do the column headers), but are unsure, I'm happy to help – either in doing some for you, or in helping if you get into difficulties while trying them out. I know the reviewers here won't complain if the list gets a few edits as a result; improving accessibility doesn't reduce the stability of an article! Hope that helps, -- RexxS ( talk) 19:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC) reply
# | Mission | Spacewalkers | Start ( UTC) | End (UTC) | Duration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rowspan=2 |1 |
EO-2 EVA 1 † |
Yury Romanenko Aleksandr Laveykin |
11 April 1987 19:41 |
11 April 1987 23:21 |
3 hours, 40 minutes |
Inspected the rear port of the core module following the failure of Kvant-1 to achieve a successful hard docking on 9 April and discovered a piece of debris left behind following the departure of Progress 28 on 27 March. This was removed, and the subsequent hard docking of the new module was observed. [1] [2] [3] |
# | Mission | Spacewalkers | Start ( UTC) | End (UTC) | Duration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
EO-2 EVA 1 † |
Yury Romanenko Aleksandr Laveykin |
11 April 1987 19:41 |
11 April 1987 23:21 |
3 hours, 40 minutes |
Inspected the rear port of the core module following the failure of Kvant-1 to achieve a successful hard docking on 9 April and discovered a piece of debris left behind following the departure of Progress 28 on 27 March. This was removed, and the subsequent hard docking of the new module was observed. [1] [2] [3] |
Comments:
bamse ( talk) 19:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 19:14, 10 May 2011 [12].
I am nominating this for featured list because, although it's been a while since I brought a list here I think that this one is ready to become featured and hopefully meets all of the criteria. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit ( talk) 18:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Cheetah (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comments from EdgeNavidad ( Talk · Contribs) 18:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Oppose For lack of
verifiability of the team column. Will change to support once acceptable source for the teams is found. (The current source only shows that the riders rode for the displayed team at a certain point during the year, not that they rode for the team during the Giro.) See discussion below.
|
Resolved comments from Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) |
---|
*Original comments 12:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 23:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 15:42, 10 May 2011 [14].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all FL criteria. Article has been based on a similar FL article, List of FIFA World Cup finals. Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 09:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments
Chamal T• C 14:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
There are quite a lot more prose issues, and overall the prose is not written to a very professional level. If you can address the points above, and leave me a message on my talk page, I'll put up some more points, and we'll try and get the writing up to a better standard (although my own writing is often full of redundancies and the such). Harrias talk 12:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments – In addition to the ones above, I found these things:
Withdraw - Theres been a pile up of comments and I dont see myself attending to all these queries as fast as I should during an FLC. Thanks to all those who gave their input, apologies for bringing this in and not devoting time to it. Thanks also to The Rambling Man for the reminders, I just have too much on my plate at the moment, I should have withdrawn this earlier. The comments will help myself (or another editor for that matter) take things into A/c before the list comes back for a second nom (which I hope will happen sometime). Cheers, Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 15:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:08, 2 May 2011 [15].
I am nominating this for featured list because...
This list is based on both Major League Baseball, collegiate football, and collegiate basketball FLs. Even though this is my first FL nomination, I have gone over the FL criteria numerous times. NorthTechsan ( talk) 23:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC) reply