The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:40, 16 June 2010 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list because I have re-edited this list completely, as I added the infobox and uploaded pictures. I added all of the proper citations and sources, and have completed a peer review. I believe this list meets the criteria to become a featured list, and I would love to see it become one! Thanks, WereWolf ( talk) 04:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose The article is insufficiently referenced. For instance, there is no reference for any of the touring musicians, and the table itself is not referenced, with the nominator insisting that readers refer to the lead for references. It is difficult to see how Klinghoffer can be a confirmed member if no media outlets have covered it. Arsenikk (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment Couldn't this easily be in the RHCP main page, i.e. does it pass criteria 3.b? Why do we need a list of the members? Sandman888 ( talk) 17:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:40, 16 June 2010 [3].
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is good enough to be a FL. I will be happy to received feedback about it. Thanks. Jaespinoza ( talk) 03:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment Does this article meet 3(b)? Why can't there just be "List of number-one albums of the 20002 (Mexico)" or something similar? I don't really have an opinion (I'm not the strongest supporter of 3(b)), but I'd just like to discuss it now, particularly because the promotion of this will probably prompt "number-one albums of 2009/2007/etc." Mm40 ( talk) 11:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:45, 13 June 2010 [4].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believ it meets all the criteria, with good prose, a suitable lead, a comprehensive covering of all items within the defined scope, a simple structure and style, and is stable. This list will need to be updfated every few years as new elections occur, but otherwise the list is stable. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose quite a bit to do (after a real quick run-through)
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments
Jujutacular T · C 17:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments –
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 19:38, 3 June 2010 [5].
This is a complete list of the leaders of the Soviet Union which i have nominated. ;P -- TIAYN ( talk) 21:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Neutral Oppose Comment. I worry that the question of who was the leader of SU at any particular historical time may be entirely subjective. For instance, why
Trotsky is not included? He may be considered the leader in 1923-1924.
Ruslik_
Zero
16:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from Ruslik_ Zero 07:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Specific problems as you asked:
This is not a complete list of problems in the article.
Ruslik_ Zero 19:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Arsenikk (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments
All in all looks pretty good, although there is always the picky details. Arsenikk (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply Sorry for the late reply, but there are so many things to do on Wikipedia and in real life right now. As a lot of the prose is rewritten, so I have some more comments:
|
Comment I am confused by the date. Based on my understanding, from April 3, 1922 to January 21, 1924, Lenin and Stalin both were the country's "leader".—
Chris!
c/
t 1:28 pm, Today (UTC−7)
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments - some quick notes
I'll oppose right now, and review again should this issue be resolved. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
Comment. I stuck my oppose, however, the lack of well defined inclusion criteria makes me to stay neutral. Ruslik_ Zero 07:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 19:23, 3 June 2010 [6].
I am nominating this for featured list because it gives readers a brief summary of hair metal and a pretty well sourced list of its groups. Me and User:FateForger were the main two contributers who worked on the article. Essentially this list is based on the list of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees, a former Featured list. Also there have been almost no edit wars. Please feel free to comment on any problems the list has. RG ( talk) 20:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 16:45, 3 June 2010 [8].
I am nominating this for featured list because it now meets ALL requirements in order to become a FA. I have followed every guideline and I have used the List of Copa Libertadores winners list as an added guideline in order to improve this article to FA standards. The Recopa Sudamericana is a highly important tournament and it is greatly regarded in its continent. It merits this. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 16:04, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Support all looks good.
Sandman888 (
talk)
16:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Hope these comments help. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 16:55, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply Well, I have fixed most of the things mentioned except for the overcapitalizing of titles...and Ref 16 needs a dash?? I don't know what you mean. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 20:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
Well, I have had one person support it (although only four people, including myself, have written about this article). As far as "that problem", I have already shown you the criteria which specifically states that table sorting is to be implemented WHERE IT HELPS which in this case doesn't (and is pointless). Let me remind you what the sort help page says...
“ | Javascript sorting may not work properly on tables with cells extending over multiple rows and/or columns (however, sorting of columns up to and including the first with colspan does not seem to be affected). Also, while cells can be empty, they should not be missing at the end of a row. In these cases sometimes the table gets messed up when attempting to sort, while other times some of the sorting buttons work while others don't. | ” |
Right now, you are talking about a whole different thing and that is not my thing. If you have any idea of how to make a sortable table for the types of pages CONMEBOL has, I would welcome them. If you want to block this from becoming a FL (which I believe will happen) over something as insipid as what I have shown you, just go ahead and do so and get it over with. If you view someone being honest being offensive, that's you. It seems no one understands the criteria here even when it is explicitaly written out. I'm tired of arguing with people that doesn't understand anything. Just go ahead and cancel this. Peace. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 14:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Rambo, I was the one who started that discussion. Unfortunetly, the tables being proposed are many times worse than the current one; besides that, reading the comments on that discussion was enough for me to go ahead and ignore the rest. People can't seem to understand that sortable tables are meant for facts and figures, not year-by-year lists (which is probably why the criteria says to implement sortable tables WHERE HELPFUL). Unfortunetly, even though I explicitly stated the criteria mentioned, those two above me keep going on and on about the same thing and then actually have the balls to say I am insulting them for stating that they don't understand. That is another reason why I blocked their comments from my page: I can discuss and talk with others but I can't talk to "walls" that think, "they are right, screw everyone else. I don't care if you can prove me anything...I am still right"....and I refuse to. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 18:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Oppose It's not accurate; the 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2003 and 2004 did not have a designated home team. These matches were played at neutral grounds. Also, the bars separating editions are distracting. -- MicroX ( talk) 16:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:40, 16 June 2010 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list because I have re-edited this list completely, as I added the infobox and uploaded pictures. I added all of the proper citations and sources, and have completed a peer review. I believe this list meets the criteria to become a featured list, and I would love to see it become one! Thanks, WereWolf ( talk) 04:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose The article is insufficiently referenced. For instance, there is no reference for any of the touring musicians, and the table itself is not referenced, with the nominator insisting that readers refer to the lead for references. It is difficult to see how Klinghoffer can be a confirmed member if no media outlets have covered it. Arsenikk (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment Couldn't this easily be in the RHCP main page, i.e. does it pass criteria 3.b? Why do we need a list of the members? Sandman888 ( talk) 17:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:40, 16 June 2010 [3].
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is good enough to be a FL. I will be happy to received feedback about it. Thanks. Jaespinoza ( talk) 03:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment Does this article meet 3(b)? Why can't there just be "List of number-one albums of the 20002 (Mexico)" or something similar? I don't really have an opinion (I'm not the strongest supporter of 3(b)), but I'd just like to discuss it now, particularly because the promotion of this will probably prompt "number-one albums of 2009/2007/etc." Mm40 ( talk) 11:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:45, 13 June 2010 [4].
I am nominating this for featured list because I believ it meets all the criteria, with good prose, a suitable lead, a comprehensive covering of all items within the defined scope, a simple structure and style, and is stable. This list will need to be updfated every few years as new elections occur, but otherwise the list is stable. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose quite a bit to do (after a real quick run-through)
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
The Rambling Man ( talk) 08:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments
Jujutacular T · C 17:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments –
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 19:38, 3 June 2010 [5].
This is a complete list of the leaders of the Soviet Union which i have nominated. ;P -- TIAYN ( talk) 21:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Neutral Oppose Comment. I worry that the question of who was the leader of SU at any particular historical time may be entirely subjective. For instance, why
Trotsky is not included? He may be considered the leader in 1923-1924.
Ruslik_
Zero
16:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from Ruslik_ Zero 07:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Specific problems as you asked:
This is not a complete list of problems in the article.
Ruslik_ Zero 19:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Arsenikk (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
;Comments
All in all looks pretty good, although there is always the picky details. Arsenikk (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply Sorry for the late reply, but there are so many things to do on Wikipedia and in real life right now. As a lot of the prose is rewritten, so I have some more comments:
|
Comment I am confused by the date. Based on my understanding, from April 3, 1922 to January 21, 1924, Lenin and Stalin both were the country's "leader".—
Chris!
c/
t 1:28 pm, Today (UTC−7)
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments - some quick notes
I'll oppose right now, and review again should this issue be resolved. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
Comment. I stuck my oppose, however, the lack of well defined inclusion criteria makes me to stay neutral. Ruslik_ Zero 07:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 19:23, 3 June 2010 [6].
I am nominating this for featured list because it gives readers a brief summary of hair metal and a pretty well sourced list of its groups. Me and User:FateForger were the main two contributers who worked on the article. Essentially this list is based on the list of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees, a former Featured list. Also there have been almost no edit wars. Please feel free to comment on any problems the list has. RG ( talk) 20:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 16:45, 3 June 2010 [8].
I am nominating this for featured list because it now meets ALL requirements in order to become a FA. I have followed every guideline and I have used the List of Copa Libertadores winners list as an added guideline in order to improve this article to FA standards. The Recopa Sudamericana is a highly important tournament and it is greatly regarded in its continent. It merits this. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 16:04, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Support all looks good.
Sandman888 (
talk)
16:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Hope these comments help. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 16:55, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply Well, I have fixed most of the things mentioned except for the overcapitalizing of titles...and Ref 16 needs a dash?? I don't know what you mean. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 20:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply |
Well, I have had one person support it (although only four people, including myself, have written about this article). As far as "that problem", I have already shown you the criteria which specifically states that table sorting is to be implemented WHERE IT HELPS which in this case doesn't (and is pointless). Let me remind you what the sort help page says...
“ | Javascript sorting may not work properly on tables with cells extending over multiple rows and/or columns (however, sorting of columns up to and including the first with colspan does not seem to be affected). Also, while cells can be empty, they should not be missing at the end of a row. In these cases sometimes the table gets messed up when attempting to sort, while other times some of the sorting buttons work while others don't. | ” |
Right now, you are talking about a whole different thing and that is not my thing. If you have any idea of how to make a sortable table for the types of pages CONMEBOL has, I would welcome them. If you want to block this from becoming a FL (which I believe will happen) over something as insipid as what I have shown you, just go ahead and do so and get it over with. If you view someone being honest being offensive, that's you. It seems no one understands the criteria here even when it is explicitaly written out. I'm tired of arguing with people that doesn't understand anything. Just go ahead and cancel this. Peace. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 14:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Rambo, I was the one who started that discussion. Unfortunetly, the tables being proposed are many times worse than the current one; besides that, reading the comments on that discussion was enough for me to go ahead and ignore the rest. People can't seem to understand that sortable tables are meant for facts and figures, not year-by-year lists (which is probably why the criteria says to implement sortable tables WHERE HELPFUL). Unfortunetly, even though I explicitly stated the criteria mentioned, those two above me keep going on and on about the same thing and then actually have the balls to say I am insulting them for stating that they don't understand. That is another reason why I blocked their comments from my page: I can discuss and talk with others but I can't talk to "walls" that think, "they are right, screw everyone else. I don't care if you can prove me anything...I am still right"....and I refuse to. Jamen Somasu ( talk) 18:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Oppose It's not accurate; the 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2003 and 2004 did not have a designated home team. These matches were played at neutral grounds. Also, the bars separating editions are distracting. -- MicroX ( talk) 16:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply