The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
My magnum opus is ready for nomination. I started this about ten years ago, in a vaguely presentable form, but this rewrite, which has taken me about two years, is vastly improved:
So, I now present it to y'all's mercy. -- Golbez ( talk) 20:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Clearly lots of work has went into this page, but there are quite a few changes that need to be made before it becomes featured. This biggest issues are that this list is not inline with the style of lists on wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists). For example:
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it meet the criteria and Peter Dinklage is awesome... AffeL ( talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose quick runthrough....
The Rambling Man ( talk) 01:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen ( talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Littlecarmen
|
Oppose. Every time I look at this list, I keep finding more and more issues. I just took a look and you didn't request a peer review before nominating this for featured list status. I think you really need to do that and perfect this list before you nominate it a second time.
Littlecarmen (
talk)
18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
reply
You did address all of the comments I have posted so far but I kept finding more and more and concluded that you needed to work on this list more. It's not mandatory to have your article peer reviewed before nominating it but you do need to make sure it is up to FL standards and I think a peer review is a really good way to do that. Now if peer reviews really are defunct, that's a shame but I don't think the FL nomination process should be used as a substitute.
Littlecarmen (
talk)
04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
reply
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC) [1]. reply
My magnum opus is ready for nomination. I started this about ten years ago, in a vaguely presentable form, but this rewrite, which has taken me about two years, is vastly improved:
So, I now present it to y'all's mercy. -- Golbez ( talk) 20:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Clearly lots of work has went into this page, but there are quite a few changes that need to be made before it becomes featured. This biggest issues are that this list is not inline with the style of lists on wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists). For example:
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list because it meet the criteria and Peter Dinklage is awesome... AffeL ( talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Oppose quick runthrough....
The Rambling Man ( talk) 01:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen ( talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Littlecarmen
|
Oppose. Every time I look at this list, I keep finding more and more issues. I just took a look and you didn't request a peer review before nominating this for featured list status. I think you really need to do that and perfect this list before you nominate it a second time.
Littlecarmen (
talk)
18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
reply
You did address all of the comments I have posted so far but I kept finding more and more and concluded that you needed to work on this list more. It's not mandatory to have your article peer reviewed before nominating it but you do need to make sure it is up to FL standards and I think a peer review is a really good way to do that. Now if peer reviews really are defunct, that's a shame but I don't think the FL nomination process should be used as a substitute.
Littlecarmen (
talk)
04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
reply