The list was not promoted 01:12, 30 December 2007.
Support as nominator, as I believe it meets all requirements of Wikipedia:Featured list criteria. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 06:53, 19 December 2007
Oppose There are a number of problem I see with the list:
Done Replaced old format with tables. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Track listing removed. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done True. They have been removed. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Have removed producers field in for all releases. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done I have expanded the article with general biographical information. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done I have changed it to a one column - looks much better. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Referenced each song. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done No references found, only general indications from label's website. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Removed links from multi-used links. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Indeed, it's an encyclopedia.
Changed to Support Looking much better! Excellent work. Drewcifer ( talk) 22:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose The page is too short and simply doesn't have enough content to be a Featured list. -- Scorpion 0422 19:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. The list is adequately sourced and is complete. This is a good discography. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 00:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- You cannot oppose feature list status to a list merely because it "doesn't have enough content". Please see, Wikipedia:Featured list criteria it is not a requirement. The closest requirement is "comprehensive" which the article is, as it lists all releases from Harry and the Potters. If you can find a release, unreleased song or complication appearance, e.t.c. by Harry and the Potters, then that is reason enough to fail it, however if you believe it is "doesn't have enough content" that is not a valid reason. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 01:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment Although I'm not part of the list's nomination, I thought I'd interject. This sounds slightly similarly to a similer problem that I had with the FLC of Nation of Ulysses discography, namely that it was too short. The point I made, which seems to apply here too, is that a list's amount of content comes down to a matter of taste, and matters of taste don't really have a whole lot to do with the FL criteria. Or in other words, personal opinion and preferences don't really have a place in a FLC: does it meet the criteria or not? Anyways, discuss as you will, I just wanted to make that comment. Drewcifer ( talk) 08:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 00:57, 28 December 2007.
Modeled on current FL lists about first-round draft picks. Covers trades has no red links in the main article (althought there are two in the footnotes). Buc ( talk) 10:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 18:29, 26 December 2007.
A good list with good images. Bewareofdog ( talk) 21:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 23:50, 23 December 2007.
self-nomination I'm nominating this list because I feel it is of equal quality to other "awards won by" FLs. I've been working on it for some time in my sandbox, and now the list is complete and referenced, see no reason not to see if it can become Featured; of course, all comments to make the list even better are welcome, as are "supports"!
There are a couple of issues I should probably mention, that is that (1) as with Star Trek, the franchise is not itallicised, but the series are. (2) As some of the series are so old, and some award givers' sites don't archive that far back, some references point to a fan site. I only hope this won't be an issue. Some award givers' sites do indicate they will be archiving nominations in the future, when that happens refs will be updated.
I should probably also mention I have nomed
Degrassi: The Next Generation for FA status, and while it isn't not allowed I'm aware it's frowned upon, but I feel I can handle both, especially since that nom isn't getting activity. That has now closed.
Thanks. --
Matthew Edwards |
talk |
Contribs
02:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted 21:22, 22 December 2007.
I am putting List of Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes up for FLC because I feel it is a very good article, and it matches all criteria. Juliancolton ( talk) 01:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done. Juliancolton ( talk) 13:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
<--*Well, that's fine for now, as long as you rectify that in the future, but there are some other problems. The writing in the lede is poor. more extensive curtainwall failures - what does this mean? The statistics section largely just gives examples about the damage, so either it should be retitled or it should give more info about actual statistics. The article still doesn't say what time of year each of the hurricanes attained Cat. 4 status. Are there any more sources? -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The 1900-1950 table just isn't working, when I put the months in it. I don't know what I am doing wrong with that table. Juliancolton ( talk) 18:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seems pretty quiet around here, other than you, Hink. :) Anybody else is welcome to post any suggestions you have. Juliancolton ( talk) 22:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Well, the months are done. Do you support yet? Juliancolton ( talk) 00:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fine. If I withdraw from the nomination (for now :), could I put it up for GAC? Juliancolton ( talk) 18:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A few other nitpicks. Minimum pressure is a fine section title. Just clarify for the pressures that are incomplete. Also, the NHC is not the source for HURDAT. Please fix. -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fine. I will withdraw. And I know you don't like me, but could you try not to show it so much, and discourage me. Juliancolton ( talk) 20:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
And who decides when a article passes or fails? Juliancolton ( talk) 14:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 19:42, 20 December 2007.
This is a list of episodes of the Guardian of the Sacred Spirit anime. I believe it qualifies under the featured list criteria, as well as satisfying project-specific criteria such as WP:FICT. It is of similar or better status than similar anime episode lists such as List of Kaze no Stigma episodes, List of Kashimashi episodes, and List of Claymore episodes. The episode summaries are not excessive in length, and other relevant information is covered. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 01:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
2 Support, 1 Oppose, 15 Days, No Active Discussion. Failed -- Scorpion 0422 19:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 19:42, 20 December 2007.
Issues raised in previous FLC attempts have been addressed. -- JohnArmagh 20:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
1 Support, 1 Oppose, 15 Days, No Active Discussion, Faied -- Scorpion 0422 19:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 11:12, 14 December 2007.
Modeled on Aston Villa F.C. seasons. There has been some disagreement between myself and Chappy84 {thank you to him BTW for his work on this list) about including the current season and the WW2 season which I we can sort out here. There are also some links which I should be able to remove within a day or so. Buc ( talk) 19:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Peanut4 ( talk) 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Further comments Seeing as other people are prepared to give this a peer review here, I shall go with consensus.
This is a list of seasons played by Leeds United Association Football Club in English and European football, from the club's formation in 1919 to the last completed season. It details the club's achievements in all major competitions, the top scorers and the average attendances for each season.
Leeds United A.F.C. were founded in 1919, following the dissolution of Leeds City F.C., and took the place in the Midland League vacated by Leeds City Reserves. Elected to the Second Division of the Football League for the 1920–21 season, they spent the next 87 years in the top two divisions before dropping into the third tier for the first time in 2007.
They have twice spent periods of over ten years in the top tier of English football, from 1964 to 1981 and from 1990 to 2004. (or instead of that last sentence, mention the great spell you had in the 1960s, which would then lead in to the para about what you won)
then talk about what they won, and mention always playing at Elland Road at the end of that para.
( information here) or when he set a club scoring record.
also wikilink play-off to the relevant article.
I am failing this nomination now. This has degenerated into a Peer review. This nom is too long and complicated to be of any use now. Woody ( talk) 11:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 03:11, 14 December 2007.
A very good list. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 20:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this as it satisfies the FL criteria. It is also detailed, has a suitable lead, along with adequate references. If there are any problems, I will sort them out. Cheers, Dav nel 03 17:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Self-nomination Hello. This is a list of works by the American screenwriter, novelist, and former journalist William Monahan. The list has recently undergone a peer review where several issues were brought up and many improvements made to the article as a result. I have chosen to include important details on Monahan's first novel Light House and his serial run "Dining Late with Claude La Badarian" directly into the article because their sections intertwine with each other as well as other sections and are too short on their own. I hope you enjoy reading this article. Best, BillDeanCarter ( talk) 23:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a list of official releases and music videos by Paris Hilton. It is well referenced and complete. — Jhn* 14:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I modelled this on List of Harry Potter films cast members, which is featured, and I believe this is a good list, it's clearly structured and easy to read, so here goes hopefully. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment - A few questions:
I feel that this list is comprehensive, well sourced, and unbiased as well as being stable and free of edit wars. - Drdisque ( talk) 05:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A fairly comprehensive article of the major characters in the Halo series. David Fuchs ( talk) 16:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 01:12, 30 December 2007.
Support as nominator, as I believe it meets all requirements of Wikipedia:Featured list criteria. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 06:53, 19 December 2007
Oppose There are a number of problem I see with the list:
Done Replaced old format with tables. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Track listing removed. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done True. They have been removed. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Have removed producers field in for all releases. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done I have expanded the article with general biographical information. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done I have changed it to a one column - looks much better. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Referenced each song. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done No references found, only general indications from label's website. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Removed links from multi-used links. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done Indeed, it's an encyclopedia.
Changed to Support Looking much better! Excellent work. Drewcifer ( talk) 22:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose The page is too short and simply doesn't have enough content to be a Featured list. -- Scorpion 0422 19:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. The list is adequately sourced and is complete. This is a good discography. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 00:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- You cannot oppose feature list status to a list merely because it "doesn't have enough content". Please see, Wikipedia:Featured list criteria it is not a requirement. The closest requirement is "comprehensive" which the article is, as it lists all releases from Harry and the Potters. If you can find a release, unreleased song or complication appearance, e.t.c. by Harry and the Potters, then that is reason enough to fail it, however if you believe it is "doesn't have enough content" that is not a valid reason. Hpfan9374 ( talk) 01:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment Although I'm not part of the list's nomination, I thought I'd interject. This sounds slightly similarly to a similer problem that I had with the FLC of Nation of Ulysses discography, namely that it was too short. The point I made, which seems to apply here too, is that a list's amount of content comes down to a matter of taste, and matters of taste don't really have a whole lot to do with the FL criteria. Or in other words, personal opinion and preferences don't really have a place in a FLC: does it meet the criteria or not? Anyways, discuss as you will, I just wanted to make that comment. Drewcifer ( talk) 08:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 00:57, 28 December 2007.
Modeled on current FL lists about first-round draft picks. Covers trades has no red links in the main article (althought there are two in the footnotes). Buc ( talk) 10:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 18:29, 26 December 2007.
A good list with good images. Bewareofdog ( talk) 21:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 23:50, 23 December 2007.
self-nomination I'm nominating this list because I feel it is of equal quality to other "awards won by" FLs. I've been working on it for some time in my sandbox, and now the list is complete and referenced, see no reason not to see if it can become Featured; of course, all comments to make the list even better are welcome, as are "supports"!
There are a couple of issues I should probably mention, that is that (1) as with Star Trek, the franchise is not itallicised, but the series are. (2) As some of the series are so old, and some award givers' sites don't archive that far back, some references point to a fan site. I only hope this won't be an issue. Some award givers' sites do indicate they will be archiving nominations in the future, when that happens refs will be updated.
I should probably also mention I have nomed
Degrassi: The Next Generation for FA status, and while it isn't not allowed I'm aware it's frowned upon, but I feel I can handle both, especially since that nom isn't getting activity. That has now closed.
Thanks. --
Matthew Edwards |
talk |
Contribs
02:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The list was not promoted 21:22, 22 December 2007.
I am putting List of Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes up for FLC because I feel it is a very good article, and it matches all criteria. Juliancolton ( talk) 01:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Done. Juliancolton ( talk) 13:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
<--*Well, that's fine for now, as long as you rectify that in the future, but there are some other problems. The writing in the lede is poor. more extensive curtainwall failures - what does this mean? The statistics section largely just gives examples about the damage, so either it should be retitled or it should give more info about actual statistics. The article still doesn't say what time of year each of the hurricanes attained Cat. 4 status. Are there any more sources? -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The 1900-1950 table just isn't working, when I put the months in it. I don't know what I am doing wrong with that table. Juliancolton ( talk) 18:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seems pretty quiet around here, other than you, Hink. :) Anybody else is welcome to post any suggestions you have. Juliancolton ( talk) 22:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Well, the months are done. Do you support yet? Juliancolton ( talk) 00:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fine. If I withdraw from the nomination (for now :), could I put it up for GAC? Juliancolton ( talk) 18:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A few other nitpicks. Minimum pressure is a fine section title. Just clarify for the pressures that are incomplete. Also, the NHC is not the source for HURDAT. Please fix. -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fine. I will withdraw. And I know you don't like me, but could you try not to show it so much, and discourage me. Juliancolton ( talk) 20:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
And who decides when a article passes or fails? Juliancolton ( talk) 14:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 19:42, 20 December 2007.
This is a list of episodes of the Guardian of the Sacred Spirit anime. I believe it qualifies under the featured list criteria, as well as satisfying project-specific criteria such as WP:FICT. It is of similar or better status than similar anime episode lists such as List of Kaze no Stigma episodes, List of Kashimashi episodes, and List of Claymore episodes. The episode summaries are not excessive in length, and other relevant information is covered. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 01:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
2 Support, 1 Oppose, 15 Days, No Active Discussion. Failed -- Scorpion 0422 19:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 19:42, 20 December 2007.
Issues raised in previous FLC attempts have been addressed. -- JohnArmagh 20:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
1 Support, 1 Oppose, 15 Days, No Active Discussion, Faied -- Scorpion 0422 19:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 11:12, 14 December 2007.
Modeled on Aston Villa F.C. seasons. There has been some disagreement between myself and Chappy84 {thank you to him BTW for his work on this list) about including the current season and the WW2 season which I we can sort out here. There are also some links which I should be able to remove within a day or so. Buc ( talk) 19:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Peanut4 ( talk) 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Further comments Seeing as other people are prepared to give this a peer review here, I shall go with consensus.
This is a list of seasons played by Leeds United Association Football Club in English and European football, from the club's formation in 1919 to the last completed season. It details the club's achievements in all major competitions, the top scorers and the average attendances for each season.
Leeds United A.F.C. were founded in 1919, following the dissolution of Leeds City F.C., and took the place in the Midland League vacated by Leeds City Reserves. Elected to the Second Division of the Football League for the 1920–21 season, they spent the next 87 years in the top two divisions before dropping into the third tier for the first time in 2007.
They have twice spent periods of over ten years in the top tier of English football, from 1964 to 1981 and from 1990 to 2004. (or instead of that last sentence, mention the great spell you had in the 1960s, which would then lead in to the para about what you won)
then talk about what they won, and mention always playing at Elland Road at the end of that para.
( information here) or when he set a club scoring record.
also wikilink play-off to the relevant article.
I am failing this nomination now. This has degenerated into a Peer review. This nom is too long and complicated to be of any use now. Woody ( talk) 11:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 03:11, 14 December 2007.
A very good list. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 20:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this as it satisfies the FL criteria. It is also detailed, has a suitable lead, along with adequate references. If there are any problems, I will sort them out. Cheers, Dav nel 03 17:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Self-nomination Hello. This is a list of works by the American screenwriter, novelist, and former journalist William Monahan. The list has recently undergone a peer review where several issues were brought up and many improvements made to the article as a result. I have chosen to include important details on Monahan's first novel Light House and his serial run "Dining Late with Claude La Badarian" directly into the article because their sections intertwine with each other as well as other sections and are too short on their own. I hope you enjoy reading this article. Best, BillDeanCarter ( talk) 23:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a list of official releases and music videos by Paris Hilton. It is well referenced and complete. — Jhn* 14:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I modelled this on List of Harry Potter films cast members, which is featured, and I believe this is a good list, it's clearly structured and easy to read, so here goes hopefully. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment - A few questions:
I feel that this list is comprehensive, well sourced, and unbiased as well as being stable and free of edit wars. - Drdisque ( talk) 05:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A fairly comprehensive article of the major characters in the Halo series. David Fuchs ( talk) 16:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC) reply