The list was not promoted by Scorpion0422 20:47, 16 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list. Gendralman ( talk) 21:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Oppose from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Review by Truco ( talk · contribs)
|
Oppose A decent list, but I have some content-issues I'd like to see addressed before I can support. First, when making discographies for individuals who have tended to work within other musical groups, it's usually best to stick just to solo projects, and leave separate band discographies to seperate lists. The Gwen Stefani discography is a good example of this, which clearly avoids listing No Doubt releases. As is Trent Reznor discography, which doesn't list Nine Inch Nails releases. Granted neither of these are Fls, but the concept still applies. So that said, the Strapping Lad stuff should be moved elsewhere. The list would still be fairly large and content-packed, so I think this would only help to focus the list. A link and a mention to a Strapping Lad discog would surely be helpful, but the actual list doesn't belong here.
So, given that change, the list would require a bit of a reorganization, namely splitting the list into sections rather than subsections within each group.
Secondly, the disclaimer "As archival policy varies, chart information may be incomplete." worries me. FLC requires a list to be complete, so this seems like a misstep right off the bat. One solution may be to specify which lists in particular have odd archival policies (via a footnote or something like that) and exactly what those peculiarities are, rather than a blanket disclaimer that puts all the charts into question. I'm not sure if this would fix the inherent problem of the list being incomplete, but some more transparency would be a step in the right direction.
I have a few more qualms and quibbles, but I'll hold off on the minor stuff until if and when the above is addressed. Drewcifer ( talk) 05:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Scorpion0422 20:47, 16 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list. Gendralman ( talk) 21:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Oppose from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Review by Truco ( talk · contribs)
|
Oppose A decent list, but I have some content-issues I'd like to see addressed before I can support. First, when making discographies for individuals who have tended to work within other musical groups, it's usually best to stick just to solo projects, and leave separate band discographies to seperate lists. The Gwen Stefani discography is a good example of this, which clearly avoids listing No Doubt releases. As is Trent Reznor discography, which doesn't list Nine Inch Nails releases. Granted neither of these are Fls, but the concept still applies. So that said, the Strapping Lad stuff should be moved elsewhere. The list would still be fairly large and content-packed, so I think this would only help to focus the list. A link and a mention to a Strapping Lad discog would surely be helpful, but the actual list doesn't belong here.
So, given that change, the list would require a bit of a reorganization, namely splitting the list into sections rather than subsections within each group.
Secondly, the disclaimer "As archival policy varies, chart information may be incomplete." worries me. FLC requires a list to be complete, so this seems like a misstep right off the bat. One solution may be to specify which lists in particular have odd archival policies (via a footnote or something like that) and exactly what those peculiarities are, rather than a blanket disclaimer that puts all the charts into question. I'm not sure if this would fix the inherent problem of the list being incomplete, but some more transparency would be a step in the right direction.
I have a few more qualms and quibbles, but I'll hold off on the minor stuff until if and when the above is addressed. Drewcifer ( talk) 05:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply