The list was archived by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 12:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [1]. reply
96th Academy Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. It followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 ceremonies were written. PrinceofPunjab TALK 13:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
six couples received nominations that they shared together in their respective categoriesis just a random fact. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 18:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I promised a full review, so here's one now.
If you need help with any of this, I suggest reaching out to Birdienest81 – he's worked on a fair few of these lists. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, which was presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," to "
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," and I also suggest adding before Kimmel: "The ceremony was directed by Hamish Hamilton." Other than that, I think it may be having an over-reliance on notes, such as in the lead for Kimmel's prior hosting duties and for the Governor Awards' prior date, which could be converted into prose text. There are also plenty of references that would benefit from links to their websites. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 01:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm puzzled that many images have alt text solely consisting of a
full stop. Only the Kimmel image has any alt text more descriptive than that. I strongly recommend adding more descriptive alt text to the rest of the images in the listicle, including those that are grouped together by the {{multiple image}}
template; see
its documentation for details on adding alt text to such groups of images.
Other than that, all seems good:
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for over two months without any support, and I'm going to need to close it to keep the queue moving. Feel free to renominate it in the future. -- Pres N 02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 12:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [1]. reply
96th Academy Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. It followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 ceremonies were written. PrinceofPunjab TALK 13:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
six couples received nominations that they shared together in their respective categoriesis just a random fact. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 18:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I promised a full review, so here's one now.
If you need help with any of this, I suggest reaching out to Birdienest81 – he's worked on a fair few of these lists. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, which was presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," to "
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," and I also suggest adding before Kimmel: "The ceremony was directed by Hamish Hamilton." Other than that, I think it may be having an over-reliance on notes, such as in the lead for Kimmel's prior hosting duties and for the Governor Awards' prior date, which could be converted into prose text. There are also plenty of references that would benefit from links to their websites. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 01:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm puzzled that many images have alt text solely consisting of a
full stop. Only the Kimmel image has any alt text more descriptive than that. I strongly recommend adding more descriptive alt text to the rest of the images in the listicle, including those that are grouped together by the {{multiple image}}
template; see
its documentation for details on adding alt text to such groups of images.
Other than that, all seems good:
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for over two months without any support, and I'm going to need to close it to keep the queue moving. Feel free to renominate it in the future. -- Pres N 02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply