The article was removed by Joelr31 00:40, 25 February 2009 [1].
Since the last review, there has been considerable work on the article [2]. Unfortunately, many citation requests remain and its factual accuracy is still disputed [3]. It is at the top of Wikipedia:Featured articles/Cleanup listing. Despite eighteen months' work on the article (since the last review) the article is still in need of assistance to restore it back to FA-status. DrKiernan ( talk) 11:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply
How do people feel about this now? Is it necessary to move to FARC? I see only one tag left, for the joke about Yeltsin. DrKiernan ( talk) 08:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The book is dominated by Norman Davies. Can someone justify/defend the NPOV status given the big criticism section in his article and whether this article gives his theories undue weight? YellowMonkey ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose FA This just doesn't look like an FA to me right now. I have two general issues, the first technical and the second relating to content. The technical issue is that there are quite a number of sentences that can't really be understood without following a Wikilink, and that isn't good writing. The content issue is that while I'm not by any means an expert, I have seen the Warsaw uprising discussed in several WWII histories, and this article doesn't clearly tell the story in the same way -- the dilemma the Poles faced of needing to assert their strength before the Soviets arrived, the tragedy that as soon as they acted, the Soviets halted their advance and allowed the Nazis to obliterate the Polish forces before entering Warsaw, the desperate struggles of the Polish forces to hold out as the net tightened. Looie496 ( talk) 02:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by Joelr31 00:40, 25 February 2009 [1].
Since the last review, there has been considerable work on the article [2]. Unfortunately, many citation requests remain and its factual accuracy is still disputed [3]. It is at the top of Wikipedia:Featured articles/Cleanup listing. Despite eighteen months' work on the article (since the last review) the article is still in need of assistance to restore it back to FA-status. DrKiernan ( talk) 11:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply
How do people feel about this now? Is it necessary to move to FARC? I see only one tag left, for the joke about Yeltsin. DrKiernan ( talk) 08:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The book is dominated by Norman Davies. Can someone justify/defend the NPOV status given the big criticism section in his article and whether this article gives his theories undue weight? YellowMonkey ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose FA This just doesn't look like an FA to me right now. I have two general issues, the first technical and the second relating to content. The technical issue is that there are quite a number of sentences that can't really be understood without following a Wikilink, and that isn't good writing. The content issue is that while I'm not by any means an expert, I have seen the Warsaw uprising discussed in several WWII histories, and this article doesn't clearly tell the story in the same way -- the dilemma the Poles faced of needing to assert their strength before the Soviets arrived, the tragedy that as soon as they acted, the Soviets halted their advance and allowed the Nazis to obliterate the Polish forces before entering Warsaw, the desperate struggles of the Polish forces to hold out as the net tightened. Looie496 ( talk) 02:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply