The article was kept by Dana boomer 19:45, 4 April 2011 [1].
Latter Days ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review because it does not meet the current Featured Article criteria 1(b): comprehensive. The 'Development and production' section is very short, like not even of GA length. To bring the section up to FA standard would require an enormous amount of research and work. - Kollision ( talk) 03:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
More detailed review by Kollision
— Kollision ( talk) 04:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Kollision, your points have been very thorough and helpful. Would you mind double-checking and striking finished points? Thank you. As i haven't edited many articles, this comes as a nice exercise (i realize someone else will probably need to do a final copy-edit and MOS check). GermanJoe ( talk) 15:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Update - all points of the original nominator are adressed, either with edits or with additional information, where the edit wouldn't be beneficial in my opinion. If i missed any major point, please update the list accordingly. GermanJoe ( talk) 13:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - Could the nominator and other interested editors/reviewers comment on whether they think that this article can be kept without a FARC? If not, more comments on what needs to be fixed would probably be helpful for the main editors to the article. Thanks! Dana boomer ( talk) 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by Dana boomer 19:45, 4 April 2011 [1].
Latter Days ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review because it does not meet the current Featured Article criteria 1(b): comprehensive. The 'Development and production' section is very short, like not even of GA length. To bring the section up to FA standard would require an enormous amount of research and work. - Kollision ( talk) 03:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
More detailed review by Kollision
— Kollision ( talk) 04:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Kollision, your points have been very thorough and helpful. Would you mind double-checking and striking finished points? Thank you. As i haven't edited many articles, this comes as a nice exercise (i realize someone else will probably need to do a final copy-edit and MOS check). GermanJoe ( talk) 15:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Update - all points of the original nominator are adressed, either with edits or with additional information, where the edit wouldn't be beneficial in my opinion. If i missed any major point, please update the list accordingly. GermanJoe ( talk) 13:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - Could the nominator and other interested editors/reviewers comment on whether they think that this article can be kept without a FARC? If not, more comments on what needs to be fixed would probably be helpful for the main editors to the article. Thanks! Dana boomer ( talk) 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply