The article was promoted 15:06, 14 August 2007.
Self-nomination: Jackie Chan is currently a good article. The biography now comprehensively covers his acting career. It also states his motivations to his choice of roles, and information of his stunts. His actions as a celebrities have been covered from different angles. The article is also sufficiently sourced, so I would like to give it a go at the FAC. If there are any problems with the article, please let me know.-- Kylohk 13:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC) reply
*Fixes needed - looks good. Certainly comprehensive and fulfils other criteria though prose is trickiest and there are a couple of things:
I'll keep looking. cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC) reply
OK, the main fault appears to be choppy sentences with little clauses as outlined above. Fix these (maybe there are a couple Ive missed) and yer over the line.....cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose-1c. Cleanup of sourcing needed to conform with
WP:V and
WP:RS. As an example, hard data (gross revenues) is cited to a webpost of a film review from a fellow named "Paul". Nice. "The three co-starred together for the first time in 1983 in
Project A, which grossed
HK$19,323,000 and won the Best Action Choreography Award at the third annual
Hong Kong Film Awards".(cite web | first = Paul | title = Project A Review | work = Film review | publisher = Hong Kong Cinema | url =
http://www.hkcinema.co.uk/Reviews/projecta.html ) Sorry, this is not good sourcing for any article, much less an FA.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk) 06:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted 15:06, 14 August 2007.
Self-nomination: Jackie Chan is currently a good article. The biography now comprehensively covers his acting career. It also states his motivations to his choice of roles, and information of his stunts. His actions as a celebrities have been covered from different angles. The article is also sufficiently sourced, so I would like to give it a go at the FAC. If there are any problems with the article, please let me know.-- Kylohk 13:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC) reply
*Fixes needed - looks good. Certainly comprehensive and fulfils other criteria though prose is trickiest and there are a couple of things:
I'll keep looking. cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC) reply
OK, the main fault appears to be choppy sentences with little clauses as outlined above. Fix these (maybe there are a couple Ive missed) and yer over the line.....cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose-1c. Cleanup of sourcing needed to conform with
WP:V and
WP:RS. As an example, hard data (gross revenues) is cited to a webpost of a film review from a fellow named "Paul". Nice. "The three co-starred together for the first time in 1983 in
Project A, which grossed
HK$19,323,000 and won the Best Action Choreography Award at the third annual
Hong Kong Film Awards".(cite web | first = Paul | title = Project A Review | work = Film review | publisher = Hong Kong Cinema | url =
http://www.hkcinema.co.uk/Reviews/projecta.html ) Sorry, this is not good sourcing for any article, much less an FA.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk) 06:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply