The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: One additional article besides the main article. No need for an eponymous category, too. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete: Sorry, I am not familiar with the criteria for categories. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Coop (
talk) 07:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, the two articles are already directly interlinked.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American men centenarians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge with parent categories for now. This is the only cross between nationality and gender for centenarians. I don't know how necessary it is but there is no such other category like it at the moment.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(Category creator) Given how many entries each parent category current has (1,735 and 2,920, respectively), I don't think diffusing them hurts. I'm sure a lot more of these could be made for the same reason, they just haven't been yet.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 02:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment, one may wonder if centenarian is still a special thing, as we meanwhile have a large number of articles about supercentenarians too. Readers interested in the extreme age topic will find enough material in the supercentenarians tree.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle, I would say that people are definitely more likely to live to a 100 now than they were in the past but that its still rare enough to be a notable thing. Of course, that is only my opinion and probably a much bigger debate should be had on this matter.
As for this particular one, the question is whether these categories should be diffused and more categories like
Category:American men centenarians should be made. I can see that diffusion can make navigation easier.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 12:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nationalists of African nations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:POVFORKs of
Category:Nationalists by nationality. The catnames assert the existence of said "nations", which is a controversial subject as a whole, and controversial in every single example ever asserted due to competing claims of various nationalists. All contents are found in the
Category:Nationalists by nationality tree already anyway.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nationalism in the Arab world
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:OVERLAPCAT. Almost completely the same contents, except framing the Middle East in terms of the largest ethnolinguistic group, the Arabs.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Is the Near East part of the Middle East?
42.200.80.48 (
talk) 12:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Donor conceived people
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. Bare assertions do not carry much weight.
(non-admin closure)HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 22:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. Although the cat is interesting, this category isn't a defining feature for anyone but the very first cases, which isn't the case for most of the folks ib here
Mason (
talk) 22:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:British squatter leaders
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. each of these categories only has 1 person in it, which isn't helpful for navigation, especially considering how small the parent category is
Mason (
talk) 21:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murdered artists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between occupation and specific cause of death. I've ensured that each member of the category is in an artists category and a murder victim category.
Mason (
talk) 21:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Language and ethnicity are different. The Kurdish category needs to be split.
Mason (
talk) 17:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Iraqi Kurdistan is a thing though. An autonomous semi-independent region with its own citizenship, if not nationality. I think what you are proposing is a change of scope. Lots of inhabitants of Iraqi Kurdistan do not speak or write Kurdish.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm happy to add another split target. My impression was that these two categories were intended to be language categories based on them being in
Iraqi poets by language.
Mason (
talk) 03:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Iraqi Turkmen is also an ethnic group, but I agree with Mason that poets are better to be categorized by language that they are writing in.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Fair points. Taking a closer look, I see that
Iraqi Kurdistan and
Kurdistan Region are two separate articles, the latter the political one. Alright, Support per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 05:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is not a defining intersection under
WP:EGRS. The intersection of textbook writers and sami ethnicity isn't defining. (FYI: the existence of non-sami versions of the category is not sufficient.)
Mason (
talk) 16:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
To be blunt, it is defining in a Sámi context and even on the enwp, even if it is not in your opinion. The category exists to differentiate Sámi non-fiction writers who are textbook writers from those Sámi non-fiction writers who are not textbook writers. Or seen from the other direction: Sámi non-fiction writers can write multiple different types of books, not just textbooks. -
Yupik (
talk) 16:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How is it defining under
EGRS? I looked but did not find evidence that this was an established intersection in academic sources. Even if you were to argue that the category is helpful for diffusion, you still need to make the case that this is a defining category.
Mason (
talk) 17:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Yupik Please review EGRS, saying something is defining in a sami context isn't particularly convincing, unless you can point to evidence.
Mason (
talk) 17:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge, unless any counter evidence is provided this is a straightforward application of the
WP:OC guideline.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:C+VG Hit award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A category for recipients of an awarded by a video game magazine. There are hundreds of magazines awarding their own awards. Not defining.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. CVG is the oldest and longest running magazine in the world. Very well respected, and being a multi format magazine, it offers a unique perspective and way of comparing games across generations. The award was used as a selling point in videogames advertising. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.148.155.34 (
talk) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, there isn't even an article about the award.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:National Football League first overall draft picks
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pro-Khalistan militant outfits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename, "militant outfits" is a phrase that I have never seen before in category names.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment This is a confusing tree. I'm not voting anything yet, I think we need to explore the options first. The main article appears to be
Groups of Khalistan movement, which is also a grammatically incorrect title. I think the parent categories provide the best clues: these are Sikh rebel or terrorist groups which seek to establish an independent Khalistan or Sikh state in Punjab through armed violence. I think "organisations" is too generic. How about "Khalistan rebel groups", "Khalistan militant groups" or "Khalistan terrorist organisations"? The articles seem to say almost every single one of them, except
Sikhs for Justice, has been designated a terrorist organisation by the government of India, and sometimes other states as well. But since "terrorist" can be POV, "rebel groups" is perhaps more neutral.
NLeeuw (
talk) 09:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
"Rebel groups" is certainly more to the point than the too general "organizations" and this is an established category as well. So definitely an improvement.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Any thoughts on "Khalistan" versus "pro-Khalistan"? This is the only cat in the tree to use "pro-"; it seems redundant, although not necessarily wrong.
NLeeuw (
talk) 20:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Caribbean people of Arab descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, very few articles and for the biographies it is not clear whether the subjects are really of ethnic Arab descent. They could be Druze, Copts, Assyrians, the articles just do not tell about it. A dual merge is not always needed, the biographies are already in
Category:People of Syrian descent etc. and the topic articles are already in
Category:Arab diaspora in the Caribbean.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose The target category is inappropriate. There is a large Arab population in
North Africa.
Dimadick (
talk) 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The latter is a fair point, it should be split between Asian and African.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dimadick: are you okay with a manual upmerge (which would merge to the appropriate parent categories, be it Asian, North Africa, or something else entirely), or are you opposed to merging in general?HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 21:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, manual upmerge seems fine to me.
Dimadick (
talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:10th-century Chinese adoptees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge: Non defining intersection between century and adoption status
Mason (
talk) 14:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean to deletesingle merge, these are articles about rulers who adopted their successor in this period, comparable to Roman emperors in another period. It has little to do with adoption in the modern period.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't they still be merged to the relevant century cateogry?
Mason (
talk) 01:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-Zionism by former country
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously closed as
merge; relisted per
request. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 18:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
With meanwhile two subcategories it is still a redundant category layer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 16:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Red Smith Award recipients
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: per
WP:OCAWARD. Information will not be lost; it has its own template and article with a list.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 13:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge. There's no need to diffuse the intersection of ethnity, cause of death, nationality, and occupation.
Mason (
talk) 12:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. While Dimadick is right, Marco's point about the articles being about Pakistan are correct too.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 23:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Good to know. I was basing the nom off of the parent categories. So manual merge to the correct Assassinated nationality?
Mason (
talk) 17:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
All articles in the category are about Pakistan so merging to Pakistan only is alright in this case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Abdi İpekçi
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, except for the eponymous article the category does not contain articles about
Abdi İpekçi.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murdered Cumhuriyet columnists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: 2x upmerge. I don't think we ought to diffuse murdered journalists by whether they worked for a specific journal.
Mason (
talk) 12:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Sounds good to me
Mason (
talk) 14:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African-Jewish diaspora
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:North African Jews is a redirect to
Maghrebi Jews. Egyptian Jews are already in the tree of Middle Eastern Jews.
Aldij (
talk) 09:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Marco. I also agree with his suggestion on the redirect.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 13:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Withdraw the nomination. --
Aldij (
talk) 08:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
North Asia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: delete/redirect, the content in these categories is broader than North Asia which is not very helpful, e.g. about Russia as a whole, or the Soviet Union as a whole. Even the Japanese Empire is among its former countries. The only content that really belongs is about Siberia, which already has its own categories, except for
Category:Exploration of Siberia.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom. If you hadn't nominated them, I would have done it sooner or later.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewish anti-Zionism in the Arab world
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African people of Jewish descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom.
Aldij (
talk) 09:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Antisemitism by region
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 12:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish telenovelas
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category. Telenovelas are basically the same as soap operas. The only difference between the two is length of series.
Telenovelafan215 (
talk) 04:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete (or merge), there isn't any particular telenovela in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A little earlier there was a topic article in it.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay. Then I guess the category was emptied after this nomination. LizRead!Talk! 16:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sámi schoolteachers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. there's only one person in this category which is unhelpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. The category now has more than one person in it. -
Yupik (
talk) 09:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Smasongarrison: this category now has eight members. Do you still believe it should be merged?HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 16:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Its fine to keep now.
Mason (
talk) 16:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It's your duty to identify these articles and add them to the categories before you nominate such categories for deletion. You
have been reminded to do so. Cheers.
42.200.57.53 (
talk) 04:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: One additional article besides the main article. No need for an eponymous category, too. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete: Sorry, I am not familiar with the criteria for categories. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Coop (
talk) 07:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, the two articles are already directly interlinked.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American men centenarians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge with parent categories for now. This is the only cross between nationality and gender for centenarians. I don't know how necessary it is but there is no such other category like it at the moment.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(Category creator) Given how many entries each parent category current has (1,735 and 2,920, respectively), I don't think diffusing them hurts. I'm sure a lot more of these could be made for the same reason, they just haven't been yet.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 02:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment, one may wonder if centenarian is still a special thing, as we meanwhile have a large number of articles about supercentenarians too. Readers interested in the extreme age topic will find enough material in the supercentenarians tree.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle, I would say that people are definitely more likely to live to a 100 now than they were in the past but that its still rare enough to be a notable thing. Of course, that is only my opinion and probably a much bigger debate should be had on this matter.
As for this particular one, the question is whether these categories should be diffused and more categories like
Category:American men centenarians should be made. I can see that diffusion can make navigation easier.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 12:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nationalists of African nations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:POVFORKs of
Category:Nationalists by nationality. The catnames assert the existence of said "nations", which is a controversial subject as a whole, and controversial in every single example ever asserted due to competing claims of various nationalists. All contents are found in the
Category:Nationalists by nationality tree already anyway.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nationalism in the Arab world
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:OVERLAPCAT. Almost completely the same contents, except framing the Middle East in terms of the largest ethnolinguistic group, the Arabs.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Is the Near East part of the Middle East?
42.200.80.48 (
talk) 12:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Donor conceived people
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. Bare assertions do not carry much weight.
(non-admin closure)HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 22:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. Although the cat is interesting, this category isn't a defining feature for anyone but the very first cases, which isn't the case for most of the folks ib here
Mason (
talk) 22:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:British squatter leaders
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. each of these categories only has 1 person in it, which isn't helpful for navigation, especially considering how small the parent category is
Mason (
talk) 21:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murdered artists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between occupation and specific cause of death. I've ensured that each member of the category is in an artists category and a murder victim category.
Mason (
talk) 21:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Language and ethnicity are different. The Kurdish category needs to be split.
Mason (
talk) 17:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Iraqi Kurdistan is a thing though. An autonomous semi-independent region with its own citizenship, if not nationality. I think what you are proposing is a change of scope. Lots of inhabitants of Iraqi Kurdistan do not speak or write Kurdish.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm happy to add another split target. My impression was that these two categories were intended to be language categories based on them being in
Iraqi poets by language.
Mason (
talk) 03:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Iraqi Turkmen is also an ethnic group, but I agree with Mason that poets are better to be categorized by language that they are writing in.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Fair points. Taking a closer look, I see that
Iraqi Kurdistan and
Kurdistan Region are two separate articles, the latter the political one. Alright, Support per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 05:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is not a defining intersection under
WP:EGRS. The intersection of textbook writers and sami ethnicity isn't defining. (FYI: the existence of non-sami versions of the category is not sufficient.)
Mason (
talk) 16:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
To be blunt, it is defining in a Sámi context and even on the enwp, even if it is not in your opinion. The category exists to differentiate Sámi non-fiction writers who are textbook writers from those Sámi non-fiction writers who are not textbook writers. Or seen from the other direction: Sámi non-fiction writers can write multiple different types of books, not just textbooks. -
Yupik (
talk) 16:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How is it defining under
EGRS? I looked but did not find evidence that this was an established intersection in academic sources. Even if you were to argue that the category is helpful for diffusion, you still need to make the case that this is a defining category.
Mason (
talk) 17:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Yupik Please review EGRS, saying something is defining in a sami context isn't particularly convincing, unless you can point to evidence.
Mason (
talk) 17:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge, unless any counter evidence is provided this is a straightforward application of the
WP:OC guideline.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:C+VG Hit award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A category for recipients of an awarded by a video game magazine. There are hundreds of magazines awarding their own awards. Not defining.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. CVG is the oldest and longest running magazine in the world. Very well respected, and being a multi format magazine, it offers a unique perspective and way of comparing games across generations. The award was used as a selling point in videogames advertising. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.148.155.34 (
talk) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, there isn't even an article about the award.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:National Football League first overall draft picks
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pro-Khalistan militant outfits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename, "militant outfits" is a phrase that I have never seen before in category names.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment This is a confusing tree. I'm not voting anything yet, I think we need to explore the options first. The main article appears to be
Groups of Khalistan movement, which is also a grammatically incorrect title. I think the parent categories provide the best clues: these are Sikh rebel or terrorist groups which seek to establish an independent Khalistan or Sikh state in Punjab through armed violence. I think "organisations" is too generic. How about "Khalistan rebel groups", "Khalistan militant groups" or "Khalistan terrorist organisations"? The articles seem to say almost every single one of them, except
Sikhs for Justice, has been designated a terrorist organisation by the government of India, and sometimes other states as well. But since "terrorist" can be POV, "rebel groups" is perhaps more neutral.
NLeeuw (
talk) 09:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
"Rebel groups" is certainly more to the point than the too general "organizations" and this is an established category as well. So definitely an improvement.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Any thoughts on "Khalistan" versus "pro-Khalistan"? This is the only cat in the tree to use "pro-"; it seems redundant, although not necessarily wrong.
NLeeuw (
talk) 20:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Caribbean people of Arab descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, very few articles and for the biographies it is not clear whether the subjects are really of ethnic Arab descent. They could be Druze, Copts, Assyrians, the articles just do not tell about it. A dual merge is not always needed, the biographies are already in
Category:People of Syrian descent etc. and the topic articles are already in
Category:Arab diaspora in the Caribbean.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose The target category is inappropriate. There is a large Arab population in
North Africa.
Dimadick (
talk) 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The latter is a fair point, it should be split between Asian and African.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dimadick: are you okay with a manual upmerge (which would merge to the appropriate parent categories, be it Asian, North Africa, or something else entirely), or are you opposed to merging in general?HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 21:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, manual upmerge seems fine to me.
Dimadick (
talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:10th-century Chinese adoptees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge: Non defining intersection between century and adoption status
Mason (
talk) 14:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean to deletesingle merge, these are articles about rulers who adopted their successor in this period, comparable to Roman emperors in another period. It has little to do with adoption in the modern period.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't they still be merged to the relevant century cateogry?
Mason (
talk) 01:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-Zionism by former country
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously closed as
merge; relisted per
request. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 18:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
With meanwhile two subcategories it is still a redundant category layer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 16:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Red Smith Award recipients
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: per
WP:OCAWARD. Information will not be lost; it has its own template and article with a list.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 13:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge. There's no need to diffuse the intersection of ethnity, cause of death, nationality, and occupation.
Mason (
talk) 12:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. While Dimadick is right, Marco's point about the articles being about Pakistan are correct too.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 23:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Good to know. I was basing the nom off of the parent categories. So manual merge to the correct Assassinated nationality?
Mason (
talk) 17:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
All articles in the category are about Pakistan so merging to Pakistan only is alright in this case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Abdi İpekçi
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, except for the eponymous article the category does not contain articles about
Abdi İpekçi.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murdered Cumhuriyet columnists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: 2x upmerge. I don't think we ought to diffuse murdered journalists by whether they worked for a specific journal.
Mason (
talk) 12:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Sounds good to me
Mason (
talk) 14:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African-Jewish diaspora
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:North African Jews is a redirect to
Maghrebi Jews. Egyptian Jews are already in the tree of Middle Eastern Jews.
Aldij (
talk) 09:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Marco. I also agree with his suggestion on the redirect.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 13:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Withdraw the nomination. --
Aldij (
talk) 08:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
North Asia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: delete/redirect, the content in these categories is broader than North Asia which is not very helpful, e.g. about Russia as a whole, or the Soviet Union as a whole. Even the Japanese Empire is among its former countries. The only content that really belongs is about Siberia, which already has its own categories, except for
Category:Exploration of Siberia.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom. If you hadn't nominated them, I would have done it sooner or later.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewish anti-Zionism in the Arab world
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 22:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African people of Jewish descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom.
Aldij (
talk) 09:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Antisemitism by region
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 12:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish telenovelas
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category. Telenovelas are basically the same as soap operas. The only difference between the two is length of series.
Telenovelafan215 (
talk) 04:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete (or merge), there isn't any particular telenovela in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A little earlier there was a topic article in it.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay. Then I guess the category was emptied after this nomination. LizRead!Talk! 16:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sámi schoolteachers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. there's only one person in this category which is unhelpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. The category now has more than one person in it. -
Yupik (
talk) 09:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Smasongarrison: this category now has eight members. Do you still believe it should be merged?HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 16:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Its fine to keep now.
Mason (
talk) 16:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It's your duty to identify these articles and add them to the categories before you nominate such categories for deletion. You
have been reminded to do so. Cheers.
42.200.57.53 (
talk) 04:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.