The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: No such conflict exists. Even the main article that was not created by the creator of this category, for the moment is currently tagged for PROD deletion by me, is an OR/Synth article. This category falls into that line. For actual proxy conflicts,
Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict and
Iran–Israel proxy conflict have a mainspace category and those are real conflicts. This category doesn't have justification to exist.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I had disowned the category because right now, nothing important had happened yet between the two but when it does, the media will be watching and we can restore the category.
SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (
talk) 23:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The name of the company is
Red Funnel not "Red Funnel Ferries". Should be uncontroversial move/rename.
Arem Seven (
talk) 10:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Question can this be closed and moved now please?
Elshad (
talk) 09:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Māori science
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Science is not specific to any culture.
101.98.39.246 (
talk) 06:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Keep Rationale does not make sense. Category contains relevant articles.
AusLondonder (
talk) 19:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment, the articles should surely remain part of the tree of
Category:Māori. But the category contains three articles about Māori and conservation, it is questionable if that belongs under science and technology. Could
Category:Māori and conservation be a way out here?
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 08:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per the arguments put forward by Oculi, Peterkingiron, and AusLondonder. I don't understand the OP's logic that it is "science is not specific to any culture" as it is specific to Maori culture.
Historyday01 (
talk) 19:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:SMALLCAT, only one article. Perhaps merge to
Category:Fishing in Europe, not sure about that because the article is about a town (with angling tourism) rather than about fishing.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Black-owned companies of the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose - there is no overall
Category:Businesses scheme; it's a redirect to
Category:Companies. Instead the few categories which include 'businesses' in their names should be renamed.
Oculi (
talk) 00:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Sure, but I created "Category:Black-owned businesses" because of the parent article
Black-owned businesses, not to try to mess up a category tree. I don't feel strongly about any of this I'm just seeking consistency. Thanks! ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 16:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name is rather strange. Since 'People in Internet' would likewise be weird, I suggest we use either the 'People related to' construction or 'Peole involved with', both exist in a number of other categories. If you agree, we should similarly rename
Category:Wikimedia people and
Category:Wikipedia peoplePiotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't think merging is a good idea. Information technology is a lot broader than internet.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 00:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:NBC Sports Radio shut down two years ago; the network is not even mentioned in the five articles still in this category. WCQuidditch☎✎ 18:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: No such conflict exists. Even the main article that was not created by the creator of this category, for the moment is currently tagged for PROD deletion by me, is an OR/Synth article. This category falls into that line. For actual proxy conflicts,
Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict and
Iran–Israel proxy conflict have a mainspace category and those are real conflicts. This category doesn't have justification to exist.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I had disowned the category because right now, nothing important had happened yet between the two but when it does, the media will be watching and we can restore the category.
SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (
talk) 23:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The name of the company is
Red Funnel not "Red Funnel Ferries". Should be uncontroversial move/rename.
Arem Seven (
talk) 10:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Question can this be closed and moved now please?
Elshad (
talk) 09:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Māori science
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Science is not specific to any culture.
101.98.39.246 (
talk) 06:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Keep Rationale does not make sense. Category contains relevant articles.
AusLondonder (
talk) 19:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment, the articles should surely remain part of the tree of
Category:Māori. But the category contains three articles about Māori and conservation, it is questionable if that belongs under science and technology. Could
Category:Māori and conservation be a way out here?
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 08:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per the arguments put forward by Oculi, Peterkingiron, and AusLondonder. I don't understand the OP's logic that it is "science is not specific to any culture" as it is specific to Maori culture.
Historyday01 (
talk) 19:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:SMALLCAT, only one article. Perhaps merge to
Category:Fishing in Europe, not sure about that because the article is about a town (with angling tourism) rather than about fishing.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Black-owned companies of the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose - there is no overall
Category:Businesses scheme; it's a redirect to
Category:Companies. Instead the few categories which include 'businesses' in their names should be renamed.
Oculi (
talk) 00:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Sure, but I created "Category:Black-owned businesses" because of the parent article
Black-owned businesses, not to try to mess up a category tree. I don't feel strongly about any of this I'm just seeking consistency. Thanks! ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 16:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name is rather strange. Since 'People in Internet' would likewise be weird, I suggest we use either the 'People related to' construction or 'Peole involved with', both exist in a number of other categories. If you agree, we should similarly rename
Category:Wikimedia people and
Category:Wikipedia peoplePiotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 07:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't think merging is a good idea. Information technology is a lot broader than internet.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 00:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:NBC Sports Radio shut down two years ago; the network is not even mentioned in the five articles still in this category. WCQuidditch☎✎ 18:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.