The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:WP:SHAREDNAME. A collection of compilation albums called "Super Hits", whose shared attribute is the name.
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 23:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. This (and other artist compilations that have identical titles) aren't really a series like Time-Life, Rhino, or NOW! have released. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Spectre
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. bibliomaniac15 02:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Defunct terrestrial television stations in the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. bibliomaniac15 06:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Marcocapelle, I had thought about that but prefer to allow the broadest people subcategories such as sportspeople, politicians, writers, musicians, given sufficient (5+) articles. The next level we should really leave for the municipalities. So basically my suggestion here is upmerge to Sportspeople from Zierikzee and rename to Footballers from Schouwen-Duiveland.
gidonb (
talk) 05:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves.
GiantSnowman 13:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
@
GiantSnowman: pinging again. I understand that
Category:Footballers by city or town in England should support the keeping of footballers categories for places smaller than municipalities. GiantSnowman, could you please point out which locales in there, if any, are smaller than municipalities?
gidonb (
talk) 00:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Your pings don't work, you need to @ me in the same edit you sign.
GiantSnowman 12:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Zierikzee is within (and therefore smaller than) Schouwen-Duiveland - so why are you wanting to move this?
GiantSnowman 16:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Because all other Dutch footballer categories are by municipalities or larger. Never smaller! Zierikzee sticks out like a sore thumb. Is this different in England?
gidonb (
talk) 16:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Giant, you're constantly dodging my question after raising the England example that also supports my RM, while referring to a need to categorize "local", which is exactly what
Schouwen-Duiveland would do.
gidonb (
talk) 03:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
No, I'm not. You want to move this category from a town to a (larger) municipality, don't you? I said it is common and useful to categorise at smaller town-level, and showed the precedent for that. Why/how on earth do you think that many other categories that categorise by town is supporting your attempt to move away from that???
GiantSnowman 10:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
There are plenty of towns with such categories but not towns smaller than municipalities. Your position is unprecedented for the Netherlands and, as you pointed out yourself, also for England.
gidonb (
talk) 05:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Eh? A town is, by definition, smaller than a municipality, and my example from England (and elsewhere) support my position ie opposing the move. Why should the Netherlands be different to how we categorise elsewhere?
GiantSnowman 16:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Many towns are also municipalities. The smaller towns belong to municipalities with several towns. Zierikzee for example. This shouldn't be so complicated. Neither in England, nor in Holland, do we have such categories for the smallest of towns.
gidonb (
talk) 00:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nintendo Switch eShop games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. bibliomaniac15 02:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: This is not a defining characteristic, to the point where the only Nintendo Switch games that to my knowledge aren't on the eShop are ones that have gotten delisted (ie the new Cooking Mama game, which had legal issues). Things were different on older Nintendo consoles – the 3DS eshop was not available when that console launched, so there were some games that weren't available digitally, and the Wii had little overlap between digital and physical releases – but for the Switch the rule of thumb is that games are available digitally, and some are also released physically when that is deemed commercially viable.
AlexandraIDV 15:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Indeed, merge - I wouldn't be against such a category if they suddenly started to bring out physical only games (although, that would be the more defining characteristic), or if we had a cat for "eshop exclusive games". As it is, it's just the same as the other category with some items missing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 17:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge eShop is just a storefront, and we generally do not track storefronts. We do track games by platform which is a defining feature. --
Masem (
t) 17:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge: Merging is a good thing, because when two or more pages combine into one, we get more stuff. I
ias!:
postb□xI 23:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge and do the same for the Wii and 3DS ones too. We don't have
Category:Windows Steam games do we? Being digital-only still makes it a Switch game, its manner of distribution isn't a defining trait (at least nowadays, 10 years ago it probably was). ~
Dissident93(
talk) 21:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I was wondering should the scope be limited to just games that can only be bought on the e-shop (e-shop exclusives)? However I do also agree with the merge.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete From the sole member,
Gehry Residence: It makes use of unconventional materials, such as chain-link fences and corrugated steel. (emphasis added) The other plausible meaning, "Buildings with chain-link fences", is so common as to be
WP:TRIVIALCAT. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Road Trip
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Portsea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Overwatch
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Procedural comment Category redirects belong at
WP:RFD, not CFD. Nonetheless, I agree that this should be deleted. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Morris family
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Marbot
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Israeli writers by language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge and rename. bibliomaniac15 02:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Seems unnecessary. This only contains one (very small) category, which could easily become a direct subcategory of its parents. The only other countries we have similar categories for are multilingual ones (India and Pakistan)
Grutness...wha? 01:52, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Not too keen on that merge - just because someone writes in Arabic, it doesn't necessarily make them Arab.
Grutness...wha? 03:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Agree with the rename of the subcategory, I'll tag that category as well.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Sounds good to me - thanks folks.
Grutness...wha? 03:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Maharajganj
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. bibliomaniac15 02:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Polish mobsters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Loudonville, New York
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename or delete as indicated.
MER-C 15:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Support largely per nom to avoid confusion with
Loudonville, Ohio, the three latter categories are largely redundant and unnessesary. A question though, would articles such as
Springwood Manor and
Whitney Mansion belong in the main category?
Inter&anthro (
talk) 00:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 10:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support renaming first as more convenient and delete the three categories as redundant.
Capankajsmilyo (
talk) 06:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:WP:SHAREDNAME. A collection of compilation albums called "Super Hits", whose shared attribute is the name.
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 23:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. This (and other artist compilations that have identical titles) aren't really a series like Time-Life, Rhino, or NOW! have released. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Spectre
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. bibliomaniac15 02:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Defunct terrestrial television stations in the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. bibliomaniac15 06:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Marcocapelle, I had thought about that but prefer to allow the broadest people subcategories such as sportspeople, politicians, writers, musicians, given sufficient (5+) articles. The next level we should really leave for the municipalities. So basically my suggestion here is upmerge to Sportspeople from Zierikzee and rename to Footballers from Schouwen-Duiveland.
gidonb (
talk) 05:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves.
GiantSnowman 13:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
@
GiantSnowman: pinging again. I understand that
Category:Footballers by city or town in England should support the keeping of footballers categories for places smaller than municipalities. GiantSnowman, could you please point out which locales in there, if any, are smaller than municipalities?
gidonb (
talk) 00:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Your pings don't work, you need to @ me in the same edit you sign.
GiantSnowman 12:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Zierikzee is within (and therefore smaller than) Schouwen-Duiveland - so why are you wanting to move this?
GiantSnowman 16:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Because all other Dutch footballer categories are by municipalities or larger. Never smaller! Zierikzee sticks out like a sore thumb. Is this different in England?
gidonb (
talk) 16:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Giant, you're constantly dodging my question after raising the England example that also supports my RM, while referring to a need to categorize "local", which is exactly what
Schouwen-Duiveland would do.
gidonb (
talk) 03:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
No, I'm not. You want to move this category from a town to a (larger) municipality, don't you? I said it is common and useful to categorise at smaller town-level, and showed the precedent for that. Why/how on earth do you think that many other categories that categorise by town is supporting your attempt to move away from that???
GiantSnowman 10:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
There are plenty of towns with such categories but not towns smaller than municipalities. Your position is unprecedented for the Netherlands and, as you pointed out yourself, also for England.
gidonb (
talk) 05:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Eh? A town is, by definition, smaller than a municipality, and my example from England (and elsewhere) support my position ie opposing the move. Why should the Netherlands be different to how we categorise elsewhere?
GiantSnowman 16:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Many towns are also municipalities. The smaller towns belong to municipalities with several towns. Zierikzee for example. This shouldn't be so complicated. Neither in England, nor in Holland, do we have such categories for the smallest of towns.
gidonb (
talk) 00:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nintendo Switch eShop games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. bibliomaniac15 02:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: This is not a defining characteristic, to the point where the only Nintendo Switch games that to my knowledge aren't on the eShop are ones that have gotten delisted (ie the new Cooking Mama game, which had legal issues). Things were different on older Nintendo consoles – the 3DS eshop was not available when that console launched, so there were some games that weren't available digitally, and the Wii had little overlap between digital and physical releases – but for the Switch the rule of thumb is that games are available digitally, and some are also released physically when that is deemed commercially viable.
AlexandraIDV 15:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Indeed, merge - I wouldn't be against such a category if they suddenly started to bring out physical only games (although, that would be the more defining characteristic), or if we had a cat for "eshop exclusive games". As it is, it's just the same as the other category with some items missing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 17:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge eShop is just a storefront, and we generally do not track storefronts. We do track games by platform which is a defining feature. --
Masem (
t) 17:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge: Merging is a good thing, because when two or more pages combine into one, we get more stuff. I
ias!:
postb□xI 23:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge and do the same for the Wii and 3DS ones too. We don't have
Category:Windows Steam games do we? Being digital-only still makes it a Switch game, its manner of distribution isn't a defining trait (at least nowadays, 10 years ago it probably was). ~
Dissident93(
talk) 21:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I was wondering should the scope be limited to just games that can only be bought on the e-shop (e-shop exclusives)? However I do also agree with the merge.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete From the sole member,
Gehry Residence: It makes use of unconventional materials, such as chain-link fences and corrugated steel. (emphasis added) The other plausible meaning, "Buildings with chain-link fences", is so common as to be
WP:TRIVIALCAT. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Road Trip
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Portsea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Overwatch
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Procedural comment Category redirects belong at
WP:RFD, not CFD. Nonetheless, I agree that this should be deleted. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Morris family
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 15:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Marbot
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 15:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Israeli writers by language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge and rename. bibliomaniac15 02:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Seems unnecessary. This only contains one (very small) category, which could easily become a direct subcategory of its parents. The only other countries we have similar categories for are multilingual ones (India and Pakistan)
Grutness...wha? 01:52, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Not too keen on that merge - just because someone writes in Arabic, it doesn't necessarily make them Arab.
Grutness...wha? 03:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Agree with the rename of the subcategory, I'll tag that category as well.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Sounds good to me - thanks folks.
Grutness...wha? 03:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Maharajganj
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. bibliomaniac15 02:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Polish mobsters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Loudonville, New York
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename or delete as indicated.
MER-C 15:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Support largely per nom to avoid confusion with
Loudonville, Ohio, the three latter categories are largely redundant and unnessesary. A question though, would articles such as
Springwood Manor and
Whitney Mansion belong in the main category?
Inter&anthro (
talk) 00:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 10:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support renaming first as more convenient and delete the three categories as redundant.
Capankajsmilyo (
talk) 06:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.