The result of the debate was rename. Andrew c 02:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Category:Australian television actors by series to Category:Actors by Australian television series reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!" 20:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:British television actors by series to
Category:Actors by British television series
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Film villains (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete both. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:The Outer Limits actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:The Twilight Zone actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete categories for anthology series; each episode for both series was a self-contained story, so most (if not all?) of the actors only appeared in one episode, and if there were any repeats, it would not have even been as the same character.
Postdlf 20:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional interdimensional travelers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was keep. the wub "?!" 16:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Ivor Novello Award winners (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
*Rename as per nom. (Side note given the recent "Superhero Actor" cat actions: At least two of those may need to be revisited.) —
J Greb 00:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Shyam ( T/ C) 00:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename all series-specific categories from "[Series name] actors" to "[Series name] recurring actors" and prune accordingly to eliminate all one-time guest stars. There are too many subcategories to list here, but all will be tagged and pointed to this discussion. This change will provide some needed relevance and focus to these categories. While many would like to see them pruned further or eliminated entirely, please do not vote in opposition as it is not clear that there is consensus to go beyond this proposal, so we should take it one step at a time. Otherwise, we'll continue to be stuck with these categories in the worst possible form. The only people opposing should be those who actually want one-time guest stars included in these categories. Postdlf 19:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Alternative: rename the subcategories to "[Series name] cast members," which a number of people seem to support. I'm fine with this as well. Postdlf 18:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Jack Cox 19:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:M&M Boys (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Oz actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete per precedents on "
Batman actors" and "
Spider-Man actors" categories, and per other pending listing on similar actors by adaptations categories; this is merely a big dumping ground for every actor who ever participated in any adaptation in any form of media of any of the
L. Frank Baum
Land of Oz books. This includes everything from the classic Judy Garland
Wizard of Oz to
The Wiz musical to the
The Muppets' Wizard of Oz television movie, and includes lead actors, bit part actors, and voice actors, none of whom obviously had to actually work on the same adaptation to appear together in this category (compare, for example,
Oliver Hardy with
Quentin Tarantino—the only time in life you are likely to be asked to do so). Trivia. Listify if you're really bored.
Postdlf 18:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 18:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Film protagonists (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hawaiian bishops (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. ( Radiant) 13:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
There's a whole category tree of "bridges completed in <year>". However, it seems to me that bridges are a kind of architecture, and no other kind of building has categories like this. Instead, we have a lot of "<year> architecture" cats. I'd say the appropriate thing to do is merging all bridge cats into subcats of Category:Years in architecture. That'd be a lot of work but we have bots for a reason. ( Radiant) 15:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Jhonen Vasquez. the wub "?!" 16:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a list of characters in a alternative comic strip. There's already an article for the strip, where characters can be discussed/listed. Suggesting deletion as non-notable category. Is every one of maybe a couple thousand comic strips going to get their own category? -- Tenebrae 15:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No, just the notible ones. -- Wack'd About Wiki 00:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC) replyIs every one of maybe a couple thousand comic strips going to get their own category?
The result of the debate was keep.
the wub
"?!" 17:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I'm not sure what this refers to. People who pretend to be an impostor? People who impose on the regular pretenders? At the very least this should be renamed, and unless someone can explain the purpose I'd say delete it. (
Radiant) 15:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 21:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
"Musicians who have withheld biographical information, usually to create a mystery as to their identity or origin" - that sounds pretty vague to me and I kind of fail to see the point. (
Radiant) 15:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 21:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom. ( Radiant) 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom. ( Radiant) 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Mostly redundant with
Category:Computer and video game genres; the cat contains genres and a bunch of weird categorizations that don't seem all that useful. Merge. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 17:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The parent category contains several genres in computer games, e.g. humor, horror and fantasy, and then it has this, which basically is "computer games that have a dinosaur in it". Seems hardly a genre to me, nor a meaningful categorization. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 16:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Should be "futuristic computer and video games", as it's not about e.g. board games. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (but agree that name seems too vague). David Kernow (talk) 21:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Again, should be "serious computer and video games", and I'm not so sure this is meaningful. Any non-humoristic game is serious, no? ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Comedy computer and video games per Radiant. David Kernow (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Comedy computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was oppose/keep Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 11:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Naval computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 11:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Educational computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus but renaming to Mythology-based computer and video games for time being. David Kernow (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to "mythology computer and video games" to match sibling cats. Also, it's probably redundant to Category:Fantasy computer and video games. I know fantasy is not the same as mythology, but in computer gaming the two are conflated. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete overeaters, no clear consensus to delete vegans. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A character's eating habits are trivia. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Characters that "don't usually show emotion". Not objectively defined, and not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Not a defining characteristic, and hard to define objectively. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete rebels, keep traitors. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not objectively defined. Fiction is rife with people who change sides, break their words or go against their nation. Does that make them all rebels or traitors in a meaningful way? ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A stereotype itself isn't fictional. Many fictional characters conform to one stereotype or other, grouping them together like this is meaningless. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Ok, ok, I'll renominate. I thought this was obvious but apparently it's not. ( Radiant) 10:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Er, right. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 01:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Futurama actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom.
Whisp
e
ring 18:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fictional secret agents and spies (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
*Delete - The label "secret agent" or "spy" seems to be arbitrarily applied across genres to any character once involved in clandestine activities. As a consequence, the category is filled with articles on characters with little to do with each other. It is unclear as to whether a precise definition for "fictional spy" or "fictional secret agent" can be developed. Therefore, the category should be deleted.
George J. Bendo 07:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional supersoldiers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 01:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional orphans (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE, by request of creator.
Postdlf 18:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Non-liturgical religious clothing (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Badly-considered name; I really wanted "
Non-clerical religious clothing", which I created afterwards. --
pne
(talk) 07:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional amnesiacs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: New York City College of Technology, City University of New York (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, The category was renamed and is now obsolete.
TigerK 69 06:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was No consensus.
Runcorn 20:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Category:Anti-Semitic people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
Note to the closing admin: In deciding this vote, please note that there have already been four CfD votes over this category in the past year and the consensus in each case has been to KEEP: (1)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 27#Category:Anti-Semitic people to Category:People accused of anti-Semitism; (2)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 13#Category:Anti-Semitic people to Category:Anti-Semitism .28people.29; (3)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 17#Category:Anti-Semitic people; (4)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 29#Category:Anti-Semitic people. Thank you.
User:IZAK
Delete, This does not belong in an encyclopaedia as it is pure vigilantism and serious libel in some cases. By all means, bios should list anti-Semitism if accurate, but this category's contents and existence is ridiculous Rcnet 05:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NPOV & This is an encyclopaedia. This article has no business in an encyclopaedia. By all means in articles about individuals where they are shown to be anti-Semitic, and this is verifiable it should be mentioned if relevant - however a directory of alleged anti-Semites is vigilantism and should be deleted from Wikipedia. WP:NPOV, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?, if this were better policed it might be a fine category, however it is not. Regardless of content authenticity, I see no reason for "Anti" categories. Has someone started a "believers (or not) in the Armenian genocide" category yet to tag peoples Bios with? - I'm scared to check... Just doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia. Rcnet 05:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC). reply
This category is being used a libel tool by IP anons all too often, I just found William Rehnquist tagged by a single edit IP, with an edit comment offering a woefully inadequate "source". Political activism does not belong in the US supreme court - nor does it belong on wikipedia. And for the record I can't stand the US republican party, which I equate to fascists in my own POV - defending republicans is not my thing. Rcnet 05:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy redirected. David Kernow (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:U-Boats (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was redirected to Leaders of political parties. David Kernow (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge (only remaining article was already in both categories). -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep (I added {{ popcat}}). -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Japanese military strategists
The result of the debate was duplicate listing. ( Radiant) 09:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anti-war films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was merge with B-Class U.S. road transport articles per ProveIt. David Kernow (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:B-Class New Jersey Road articles (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
I don't think we should be putting articles in categories like this.
NE2 02:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Shyam ( T/ C) 00:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Private schools in Indiana. David Kernow (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. If any gets recreated let me know and I will salt. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hulk actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Fantastic Four actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Wonder Woman actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:X-Men actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete per precedents on categories for
Batman actors and
Spider-Man actors. These are not mere
actors by series categories, despite their presence as subcategories of that parent, because they actually indiscriminately lump together actors from all films, television series, and video games (!) featuring the characters. This has the result of linking together people who never actually worked on the same project merely because the same licensed comic book character was involved in at least one of the films, television shows, or video games on which the actor worked. This is trivia, best handled by a list instead of cluttering the actor categories. Lest someone object that these could be broken down into categories for the individual television series or films, this deletion vote has nothing to do with such completely different categories (some of which may exist, such as
Category:X-Men film actors). The ones proposed for deletion don't tell anything about how the category applies to the actor—even with the films separated out for the X-Men category, for example, the actor could have actually played an X-Men member in a cartoon series, played the voice of a supporting character in a single episode of a cartoon series, played an extra in a single episode, or contributed the voice of an extra to a single video game; it's all lumped in together with these.
Postdlf 00:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename All as Georgia (U.S. state). Lwueid 21:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Andrew c 02:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Category:Australian television actors by series to Category:Actors by Australian television series reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!" 20:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:British television actors by series to
Category:Actors by British television series
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Film villains (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete both. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:The Outer Limits actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:The Twilight Zone actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete categories for anthology series; each episode for both series was a self-contained story, so most (if not all?) of the actors only appeared in one episode, and if there were any repeats, it would not have even been as the same character.
Postdlf 20:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional interdimensional travelers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was keep. the wub "?!" 16:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Ivor Novello Award winners (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
*Rename as per nom. (Side note given the recent "Superhero Actor" cat actions: At least two of those may need to be revisited.) —
J Greb 00:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Shyam ( T/ C) 00:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename all series-specific categories from "[Series name] actors" to "[Series name] recurring actors" and prune accordingly to eliminate all one-time guest stars. There are too many subcategories to list here, but all will be tagged and pointed to this discussion. This change will provide some needed relevance and focus to these categories. While many would like to see them pruned further or eliminated entirely, please do not vote in opposition as it is not clear that there is consensus to go beyond this proposal, so we should take it one step at a time. Otherwise, we'll continue to be stuck with these categories in the worst possible form. The only people opposing should be those who actually want one-time guest stars included in these categories. Postdlf 19:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Alternative: rename the subcategories to "[Series name] cast members," which a number of people seem to support. I'm fine with this as well. Postdlf 18:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Jack Cox 19:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:M&M Boys (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Oz actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete per precedents on "
Batman actors" and "
Spider-Man actors" categories, and per other pending listing on similar actors by adaptations categories; this is merely a big dumping ground for every actor who ever participated in any adaptation in any form of media of any of the
L. Frank Baum
Land of Oz books. This includes everything from the classic Judy Garland
Wizard of Oz to
The Wiz musical to the
The Muppets' Wizard of Oz television movie, and includes lead actors, bit part actors, and voice actors, none of whom obviously had to actually work on the same adaptation to appear together in this category (compare, for example,
Oliver Hardy with
Quentin Tarantino—the only time in life you are likely to be asked to do so). Trivia. Listify if you're really bored.
Postdlf 18:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 18:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Film protagonists (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hawaiian bishops (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. ( Radiant) 13:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
There's a whole category tree of "bridges completed in <year>". However, it seems to me that bridges are a kind of architecture, and no other kind of building has categories like this. Instead, we have a lot of "<year> architecture" cats. I'd say the appropriate thing to do is merging all bridge cats into subcats of Category:Years in architecture. That'd be a lot of work but we have bots for a reason. ( Radiant) 15:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Jhonen Vasquez. the wub "?!" 16:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a list of characters in a alternative comic strip. There's already an article for the strip, where characters can be discussed/listed. Suggesting deletion as non-notable category. Is every one of maybe a couple thousand comic strips going to get their own category? -- Tenebrae 15:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No, just the notible ones. -- Wack'd About Wiki 00:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC) replyIs every one of maybe a couple thousand comic strips going to get their own category?
The result of the debate was keep.
the wub
"?!" 17:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I'm not sure what this refers to. People who pretend to be an impostor? People who impose on the regular pretenders? At the very least this should be renamed, and unless someone can explain the purpose I'd say delete it. (
Radiant) 15:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 21:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
"Musicians who have withheld biographical information, usually to create a mystery as to their identity or origin" - that sounds pretty vague to me and I kind of fail to see the point. (
Radiant) 15:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 21:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom. ( Radiant) 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom. ( Radiant) 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Mostly redundant with
Category:Computer and video game genres; the cat contains genres and a bunch of weird categorizations that don't seem all that useful. Merge. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 17:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The parent category contains several genres in computer games, e.g. humor, horror and fantasy, and then it has this, which basically is "computer games that have a dinosaur in it". Seems hardly a genre to me, nor a meaningful categorization. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 16:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Should be "futuristic computer and video games", as it's not about e.g. board games. (
Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (but agree that name seems too vague). David Kernow (talk) 21:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Again, should be "serious computer and video games", and I'm not so sure this is meaningful. Any non-humoristic game is serious, no? ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Comedy computer and video games per Radiant. David Kernow (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Comedy computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was oppose/keep Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 11:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Naval computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 11:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge; redundant with Category:Educational computer and video games. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus but renaming to Mythology-based computer and video games for time being. David Kernow (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to "mythology computer and video games" to match sibling cats. Also, it's probably redundant to Category:Fantasy computer and video games. I know fantasy is not the same as mythology, but in computer gaming the two are conflated. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete overeaters, no clear consensus to delete vegans. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A character's eating habits are trivia. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Characters that "don't usually show emotion". Not objectively defined, and not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Not a defining characteristic, and hard to define objectively. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete rebels, keep traitors. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not objectively defined. Fiction is rife with people who change sides, break their words or go against their nation. Does that make them all rebels or traitors in a meaningful way? ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A stereotype itself isn't fictional. Many fictional characters conform to one stereotype or other, grouping them together like this is meaningless. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Ok, ok, I'll renominate. I thought this was obvious but apparently it's not. ( Radiant) 10:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Er, right. ( Radiant) 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 01:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Futurama actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nom.
Whisp
e
ring 18:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fictional secret agents and spies (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
*Delete - The label "secret agent" or "spy" seems to be arbitrarily applied across genres to any character once involved in clandestine activities. As a consequence, the category is filled with articles on characters with little to do with each other. It is unclear as to whether a precise definition for "fictional spy" or "fictional secret agent" can be developed. Therefore, the category should be deleted.
George J. Bendo 07:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional supersoldiers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 01:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional orphans (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE, by request of creator.
Postdlf 18:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Non-liturgical religious clothing (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Badly-considered name; I really wanted "
Non-clerical religious clothing", which I created afterwards. --
pne
(talk) 07:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional amnesiacs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: New York City College of Technology, City University of New York (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, The category was renamed and is now obsolete.
TigerK 69 06:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was No consensus.
Runcorn 20:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Category:Anti-Semitic people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
Note to the closing admin: In deciding this vote, please note that there have already been four CfD votes over this category in the past year and the consensus in each case has been to KEEP: (1)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 27#Category:Anti-Semitic people to Category:People accused of anti-Semitism; (2)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 13#Category:Anti-Semitic people to Category:Anti-Semitism .28people.29; (3)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 17#Category:Anti-Semitic people; (4)
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 29#Category:Anti-Semitic people. Thank you.
User:IZAK
Delete, This does not belong in an encyclopaedia as it is pure vigilantism and serious libel in some cases. By all means, bios should list anti-Semitism if accurate, but this category's contents and existence is ridiculous Rcnet 05:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NPOV & This is an encyclopaedia. This article has no business in an encyclopaedia. By all means in articles about individuals where they are shown to be anti-Semitic, and this is verifiable it should be mentioned if relevant - however a directory of alleged anti-Semites is vigilantism and should be deleted from Wikipedia. WP:NPOV, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?, if this were better policed it might be a fine category, however it is not. Regardless of content authenticity, I see no reason for "Anti" categories. Has someone started a "believers (or not) in the Armenian genocide" category yet to tag peoples Bios with? - I'm scared to check... Just doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia. Rcnet 05:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC). reply
This category is being used a libel tool by IP anons all too often, I just found William Rehnquist tagged by a single edit IP, with an edit comment offering a woefully inadequate "source". Political activism does not belong in the US supreme court - nor does it belong on wikipedia. And for the record I can't stand the US republican party, which I equate to fascists in my own POV - defending republicans is not my thing. Rcnet 05:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy redirected. David Kernow (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:U-Boats (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was redirected to Leaders of political parties. David Kernow (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge (only remaining article was already in both categories). -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep (I added {{ popcat}}). -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Japanese military strategists
The result of the debate was duplicate listing. ( Radiant) 09:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anti-war films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was merge with B-Class U.S. road transport articles per ProveIt. David Kernow (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:B-Class New Jersey Road articles (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
I don't think we should be putting articles in categories like this.
NE2 02:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Shyam ( T/ C) 00:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Private schools in Indiana. David Kernow (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. If any gets recreated let me know and I will salt. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hulk actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Fantastic Four actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Wonder Woman actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:X-Men actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete per precedents on categories for
Batman actors and
Spider-Man actors. These are not mere
actors by series categories, despite their presence as subcategories of that parent, because they actually indiscriminately lump together actors from all films, television series, and video games (!) featuring the characters. This has the result of linking together people who never actually worked on the same project merely because the same licensed comic book character was involved in at least one of the films, television shows, or video games on which the actor worked. This is trivia, best handled by a list instead of cluttering the actor categories. Lest someone object that these could be broken down into categories for the individual television series or films, this deletion vote has nothing to do with such completely different categories (some of which may exist, such as
Category:X-Men film actors). The ones proposed for deletion don't tell anything about how the category applies to the actor—even with the films separated out for the X-Men category, for example, the actor could have actually played an X-Men member in a cartoon series, played the voice of a supporting character in a single episode of a cartoon series, played an extra in a single episode, or contributed the voice of an extra to a single video game; it's all lumped in together with these.
Postdlf 00:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename All as Georgia (U.S. state). Lwueid 21:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply