The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete and salt with vigour if not vinegar. Good grief, speedy deleted twice AND draftified twice, brought back yet again. Frankenstein's article, this needs to stop. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
10:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep New links were added after the article was draftified. It was a Start class article with continuous edits going on to improve the content. Don't feel the need to be deleted.
Speedy delete and salt. A7 candicate, aggressively promoted by one editor (and an "unrelated" IP voting keep here as well), deliberately creating fake sources. After the first drafting or deletion, suddenly an "interview" appeared at Medium.com (where anyone can post anything) by "Samara Lopez", "A professional writer with over 10 years’ experience with Rolling Stone and Mashable as a writer.", about whom nothing else can be found. Promoting an artist, OK, but faking sources and interviews to get into enwiki? Delete, salt, and considering getting rid of the editor as well.
Fram (
talk)
08:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt; way too many repeated creations to assume good faith to. Either fancruft or WP:PAID, either way, it's WP:NOT what we're here for.
——Serial16:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete being mentioned on a music writer's playlist does not establish notability. Still heavily promotional. Should not have gotten out of draft status, but now that it has, here we are.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff)
17:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Salt too, the drafts were earlier copies created by the same SPA but moved by editors to draft, so it never really got developed in draft.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff)
15:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete and salt with vigour if not vinegar. Good grief, speedy deleted twice AND draftified twice, brought back yet again. Frankenstein's article, this needs to stop. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
10:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep New links were added after the article was draftified. It was a Start class article with continuous edits going on to improve the content. Don't feel the need to be deleted.
Speedy delete and salt. A7 candicate, aggressively promoted by one editor (and an "unrelated" IP voting keep here as well), deliberately creating fake sources. After the first drafting or deletion, suddenly an "interview" appeared at Medium.com (where anyone can post anything) by "Samara Lopez", "A professional writer with over 10 years’ experience with Rolling Stone and Mashable as a writer.", about whom nothing else can be found. Promoting an artist, OK, but faking sources and interviews to get into enwiki? Delete, salt, and considering getting rid of the editor as well.
Fram (
talk)
08:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt; way too many repeated creations to assume good faith to. Either fancruft or WP:PAID, either way, it's WP:NOT what we're here for.
——Serial16:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete being mentioned on a music writer's playlist does not establish notability. Still heavily promotional. Should not have gotten out of draft status, but now that it has, here we are.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff)
17:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Salt too, the drafts were earlier copies created by the same SPA but moved by editors to draft, so it never really got developed in draft.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff)
15:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.