The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Almost certainly created by someone with a conflict of interest, the article is so biased and terribly formatted that it suffers from lack of
WP:TNT. InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - I might have been tempted to nominate it for speedy deletion as unambiguously promotional, even. And when you sift through the advertising hype, it becomes evident that this is a business person who has started a couple of companies - but there is no real claim to notability, nor any sources to show that notability exists. --bonadeacontributionstalk 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I removed one section that was entirely promotional and almost entirely a copyright violation, and some advertising for companies run by family members. What remains needs editing if the article should stay but at least it is slightly less egregiously promotional. --bonadeacontributionstalk 11:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Strong delete the only verified claim is opening a beauty lounge. Seriously
LibStar (
talk) 16:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage in RS. Coverage is mostly trivial mentions of a local business, and one interview which is hardly independent. Notability not established.
MB 16:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Almost certainly created by someone with a conflict of interest, the article is so biased and terribly formatted that it suffers from lack of
WP:TNT. InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - I might have been tempted to nominate it for speedy deletion as unambiguously promotional, even. And when you sift through the advertising hype, it becomes evident that this is a business person who has started a couple of companies - but there is no real claim to notability, nor any sources to show that notability exists. --bonadeacontributionstalk 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I removed one section that was entirely promotional and almost entirely a copyright violation, and some advertising for companies run by family members. What remains needs editing if the article should stay but at least it is slightly less egregiously promotional. --bonadeacontributionstalk 11:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Strong delete the only verified claim is opening a beauty lounge. Seriously
LibStar (
talk) 16:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage in RS. Coverage is mostly trivial mentions of a local business, and one interview which is hardly independent. Notability not established.
MB 16:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.