The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fail to see how this musician is notable, almost all the sources are mainly about his album promotions. the topic of this article fails WP:NMUSICIAN , it fails wikipedia notability guildlines, another upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about , completely and utterly non-notable musician, sourced entirely to press releases , No evidence of notability
Samat lib (
talk)
08:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In what way does it fail? Literally the first point in "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself."Vogue and
Guardian.ng obviously cover that. --
Paul ❬
talk❭
08:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's a much greater range of coverage than the artist articles you've created (
1,
2), the notability is clearly apparent. What on earth is your motivation with these nominations? --
Paul ❬
talk❭
20:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
comment wikipedoa is not a place for irelevant topic , article that fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN , and
WP:GNG , upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about ,
Samat lib (
talk)
21:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep — I can observe at least three reliable sources discussing subject. Per
WP:MUSICBIO, Failure to meet any criterion listed therein doesn’t translate to the subject of the article being non notable, with 3 good sources in the article I’d say GNG is satisfied here. Furthermore @
Paul Carpenter, in the nominator's defense, I For one who has lived in Nigeria for 20+ years can say for a fact that any Nigerian editor passing by without thoroughly vetting the article's sources would !vote a Delete in a heartbeat as subject of our discussion has almost no recognition in the Nigerian media/ Nigerian entertainment industry. I believe a COI is present in the article also. Celestina007 (
talk)
13:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fail to see how this musician is notable, almost all the sources are mainly about his album promotions. the topic of this article fails WP:NMUSICIAN , it fails wikipedia notability guildlines, another upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about , completely and utterly non-notable musician, sourced entirely to press releases , No evidence of notability
Samat lib (
talk)
08:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In what way does it fail? Literally the first point in "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself."Vogue and
Guardian.ng obviously cover that. --
Paul ❬
talk❭
08:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's a much greater range of coverage than the artist articles you've created (
1,
2), the notability is clearly apparent. What on earth is your motivation with these nominations? --
Paul ❬
talk❭
20:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
comment wikipedoa is not a place for irelevant topic , article that fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN , and
WP:GNG , upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about ,
Samat lib (
talk)
21:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep — I can observe at least three reliable sources discussing subject. Per
WP:MUSICBIO, Failure to meet any criterion listed therein doesn’t translate to the subject of the article being non notable, with 3 good sources in the article I’d say GNG is satisfied here. Furthermore @
Paul Carpenter, in the nominator's defense, I For one who has lived in Nigeria for 20+ years can say for a fact that any Nigerian editor passing by without thoroughly vetting the article's sources would !vote a Delete in a heartbeat as subject of our discussion has almost no recognition in the Nigerian media/ Nigerian entertainment industry. I believe a COI is present in the article also. Celestina007 (
talk)
13:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.