- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 04:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Wagner Group
- Wagner Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a nicely formatted and written article about a perfectly average, non-notable company. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Remember: we are not Yellow Pages. Companies we write about should be encyclopedic (check linked policies). This one doesn't seem to be meet said criteria. Oh, and there is also the WP:COI issue: creator is a WP:SPA Christine at Wagner ( talk · contribs). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete-Searches produced no reliable secondary sources that could support notability per Wikipedia guidelines. ABF99 ( talk) 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The depth of coverage in the sources is not substantial enough to establish notability for an encyclopedia, see WP:CORPDEPTH. Also per WP:NOTYELLOW. — Ben Ben ( talk) 17:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above editors. Search engines did not show how this corp meets notability guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 14:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 04:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Wagner Group
- Wagner Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a nicely formatted and written article about a perfectly average, non-notable company. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Remember: we are not Yellow Pages. Companies we write about should be encyclopedic (check linked policies). This one doesn't seem to be meet said criteria. Oh, and there is also the WP:COI issue: creator is a WP:SPA Christine at Wagner ( talk · contribs). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete-Searches produced no reliable secondary sources that could support notability per Wikipedia guidelines. ABF99 ( talk) 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The depth of coverage in the sources is not substantial enough to establish notability for an encyclopedia, see WP:CORPDEPTH. Also per WP:NOTYELLOW. — Ben Ben ( talk) 17:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above editors. Search engines did not show how this corp meets notability guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 14:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.