The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Oakshade: That is primary problem with this article, these are PR interview's, made at the begining of the film, in question. They fail
WP:BLPPRIMARY. They are not secondary sources, and this is a
WP:BLP. Where is the secondary sources. I've no doubt the Kerala award is notable, re: last Afd, but where is the other secondary sources. Not interviews. Real secondary sources. The gold standard for BLP's, references that are needed to prove notabilty. . scope_creepTalk10:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
There are many sources attached to this article that are not good, but that does not negate the ones that are. That would be a matter of regular editing, not deletion.
Oakshade (
talk)
16:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Oakshade: That is primary problem with this article, these are PR interview's, made at the begining of the film, in question. They fail
WP:BLPPRIMARY. They are not secondary sources, and this is a
WP:BLP. Where is the secondary sources. I've no doubt the Kerala award is notable, re: last Afd, but where is the other secondary sources. Not interviews. Real secondary sources. The gold standard for BLP's, references that are needed to prove notabilty. . scope_creepTalk10:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
There are many sources attached to this article that are not good, but that does not negate the ones that are. That would be a matter of regular editing, not deletion.
Oakshade (
talk)
16:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.