The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The
biographies of living persons policy is long-standing. Effectively, you cannot write about living people without immediately giving high-quality sources of where you got the information from. Without this, it is far too easy to accidentally libel someone without realising, so it is prohibited by policy.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont)11:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify by un-redirecting
Draft:Varthur Santhosh and deleting mainspace copy and paste move Unsourced BLP with tendentious bypass of AfC by disruptive editor. I don't know how to !vote in this scenario. The draft has the meaningful history including the AfC decline, while the mainspace page has nothing.
Uhai (
talk)
11:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you gather information from source about this person and give information about him
Your request means very little without
what is required to make an article. Draftifying it will give you the opportunity to bring it into compliance. Failure to do so will mean it will be deleted. Repeated attempts to create an article without the required sourcing and notability will likely cause you to be blocked from editing here entirely. -
UtherSRG(talk)15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Inexperienced doesn't realize that BLP articles need to be at a certain quality before they can be in main article space. Draftify this so as to give them time to work on it.
UtherSRG(talk)11:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Ineligible for draftification as the draft with history, including AfC decline, already exists at
Draft:Varthur Santhosh (now converted to a redirect) and creator pasted the contents over the redirect in the mainspace created by previous draftification.
Uhai (
talk)
12:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Not an A7 case. The individual was caught up in a controversy and made headlines after being arrested by the forest department for supposedly wearing a tiger claw pendant during a reality show, where he was a contestant. The article is currently unsourced and should be moved to draft to provide the author with the necessary time and space to improve it. Some sources i came across
The Times of India,
LiveMint,
Times Of India,
The Hindu, and
DNA.
AmusingWeasel (
talk)
12:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Even with the sources above, coverage is trivial; most have more space for photos than actual text in the article. He was on a TV show and wound up in trouble with the law is about what they all show, there really isn't much extra added.
Oaktree b (
talk)
14:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The
biographies of living persons policy is long-standing. Effectively, you cannot write about living people without immediately giving high-quality sources of where you got the information from. Without this, it is far too easy to accidentally libel someone without realising, so it is prohibited by policy.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont)11:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify by un-redirecting
Draft:Varthur Santhosh and deleting mainspace copy and paste move Unsourced BLP with tendentious bypass of AfC by disruptive editor. I don't know how to !vote in this scenario. The draft has the meaningful history including the AfC decline, while the mainspace page has nothing.
Uhai (
talk)
11:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you gather information from source about this person and give information about him
Your request means very little without
what is required to make an article. Draftifying it will give you the opportunity to bring it into compliance. Failure to do so will mean it will be deleted. Repeated attempts to create an article without the required sourcing and notability will likely cause you to be blocked from editing here entirely. -
UtherSRG(talk)15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Inexperienced doesn't realize that BLP articles need to be at a certain quality before they can be in main article space. Draftify this so as to give them time to work on it.
UtherSRG(talk)11:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Ineligible for draftification as the draft with history, including AfC decline, already exists at
Draft:Varthur Santhosh (now converted to a redirect) and creator pasted the contents over the redirect in the mainspace created by previous draftification.
Uhai (
talk)
12:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Not an A7 case. The individual was caught up in a controversy and made headlines after being arrested by the forest department for supposedly wearing a tiger claw pendant during a reality show, where he was a contestant. The article is currently unsourced and should be moved to draft to provide the author with the necessary time and space to improve it. Some sources i came across
The Times of India,
LiveMint,
Times Of India,
The Hindu, and
DNA.
AmusingWeasel (
talk)
12:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Even with the sources above, coverage is trivial; most have more space for photos than actual text in the article. He was on a TV show and wound up in trouble with the law is about what they all show, there really isn't much extra added.
Oaktree b (
talk)
14:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.