From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 14:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Van (band)

Van (band) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article that actually talks about the band isn’t even a paragraph; most of the page talks about an album they made. And it is completely unsourced and lacking notability. ~SML TP 16:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
struck sock. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The Keep voters seem to be misreading/misapplying NMUSIC. WP:BAND states an ensemble may be notable if they have works that charted, not that they are notable – the general notability guideline still applies. PERMASTUB is not a policy, etc., but the idea behind it comes from WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list." An encyclopedic article cannot be generated from a source that only lists chart positions. — Ojorojo ( talk) 14:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 14:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Van (band)

Van (band) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article that actually talks about the band isn’t even a paragraph; most of the page talks about an album they made. And it is completely unsourced and lacking notability. ~SML TP 16:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply
struck sock. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The Keep voters seem to be misreading/misapplying NMUSIC. WP:BAND states an ensemble may be notable if they have works that charted, not that they are notable – the general notability guideline still applies. PERMASTUB is not a policy, etc., but the idea behind it comes from WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list." An encyclopedic article cannot be generated from a source that only lists chart positions. — Ojorojo ( talk) 14:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook