The result was delete. There seems to be a consensus to delete or draftify the article. Given that it is unlikely anybody will come around to improve the article (given the creator's indefinite block), my sense is that draftifying the article will just result in an abandoned draft. If the creator would like a copy of the article, I would be happy to provide it at any time. Malinaccier ( talk) 02:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I do not think that this person meets the criteria for notability. I have been unable to find any reference to him other than the The Hindu article ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240317044514/https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/the-lawyer-as-a-writer/article4683660.ece), which just effectively said it was nice to read. And cryptic metadata from library websites who happen to have the book (which seems to just be stanford and nyu https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/in00000071311 ) Mason ( talk) 02:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Note to Closer. Page was created by
sockpuppet and is good for
WP:G5 speedy deletion.
RangersRus (
talk) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided. Just FYI, a general comment for all AFDs, when an editor says "seems like" or "likely" or "appears to be" it means to me that the editor hasn't read or seen the sources and are basing their opinion on attributes like the title or the publisher. If that's the case, it's good not to have an absolutist opinion on what should happen with an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk) 20:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There seems to be a consensus to delete or draftify the article. Given that it is unlikely anybody will come around to improve the article (given the creator's indefinite block), my sense is that draftifying the article will just result in an abandoned draft. If the creator would like a copy of the article, I would be happy to provide it at any time. Malinaccier ( talk) 02:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I do not think that this person meets the criteria for notability. I have been unable to find any reference to him other than the The Hindu article ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240317044514/https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/the-lawyer-as-a-writer/article4683660.ece), which just effectively said it was nice to read. And cryptic metadata from library websites who happen to have the book (which seems to just be stanford and nyu https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/in00000071311 ) Mason ( talk) 02:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Note to Closer. Page was created by
sockpuppet and is good for
WP:G5 speedy deletion.
RangersRus (
talk) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided. Just FYI, a general comment for all AFDs, when an editor says "seems like" or "likely" or "appears to be" it means to me that the editor hasn't read or seen the sources and are basing their opinion on attributes like the title or the publisher. If that's the case, it's good not to have an absolutist opinion on what should happen with an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk) 20:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)