The result was KEEP. The consensus below is that any problems can be addressed through merger or renaming, so normal editing takes over from here. postdlf ( talk) 14:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This stub is pure rubbish. There never was a state known under this name. The article has no references and not much content either. It's also almost an orphan. The coat of arms in the infobox is just somebody's ahistorical doodle, nothing more. — Kpalion (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP. The consensus below is that any problems can be addressed through merger or renaming, so normal editing takes over from here. postdlf ( talk) 14:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This stub is pure rubbish. There never was a state known under this name. The article has no references and not much content either. It's also almost an orphan. The coat of arms in the infobox is just somebody's ahistorical doodle, nothing more. — Kpalion (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply