- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Undown ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. I originally nominated this article for speedy deletion before I realized how much history it has. Enough people have looked at it and not decided it needed to be deleted for at least an AFD discussion, but there doesn't seem to be anything at all notable about this band. No assertions of any chart positions; no tours; no indications of any significant coverage at all. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: I couldn't find anything on them—at least in English.-- Fotoriety ( talk) 00:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's simply nothing better at all here, not even minimally better notable and acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Short-lived project band. Japanese sources muddled by music magazine of same name existing at same time. Complete absence of WP:RS and discography is probably lifted from Amazon Japan or HMV. No room for improvement, no potential. Jun Kayama 08:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Undown ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. I originally nominated this article for speedy deletion before I realized how much history it has. Enough people have looked at it and not decided it needed to be deleted for at least an AFD discussion, but there doesn't seem to be anything at all notable about this band. No assertions of any chart positions; no tours; no indications of any significant coverage at all. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: I couldn't find anything on them—at least in English.-- Fotoriety ( talk) 00:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's simply nothing better at all here, not even minimally better notable and acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Short-lived project band. Japanese sources muddled by music magazine of same name existing at same time. Complete absence of WP:RS and discography is probably lifted from Amazon Japan or HMV. No room for improvement, no potential. Jun Kayama 08:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.