The result was keep per User:pburka's rationale. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non notable band that fails to meet WP:BAND and generally lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Celestina007 ( talk) 01:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
They are still an indie band, but they are growing. They have released two albums and sevens singles. They have been mentioned in magazines such as Revolver and LA Times. Alex Jones and Infowars also did an entire segment about them. They are gaining quite the following around the world, and they are also forming their own musical style.
I have no affiliation with the band, with the soul exception of having heard and read about them recently and was surprised that there was no entry about them on Wikipedia.
They also have over a million listeners on Spotify.
I do believe they live up to Wikipedia’s requirements for being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
IMHO they at least qualify for point #7: “Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city.”
They have invented their own genre, which makes them unique and culturally interesting. At least interesting enough for being picked up by LA Times, Revolver Magazine, and Metalhammer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The article has been up for almost three weeks now. I think it’s longer AfD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 00:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep per User:pburka's rationale. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non notable band that fails to meet WP:BAND and generally lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Celestina007 ( talk) 01:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
They are still an indie band, but they are growing. They have released two albums and sevens singles. They have been mentioned in magazines such as Revolver and LA Times. Alex Jones and Infowars also did an entire segment about them. They are gaining quite the following around the world, and they are also forming their own musical style.
I have no affiliation with the band, with the soul exception of having heard and read about them recently and was surprised that there was no entry about them on Wikipedia.
They also have over a million listeners on Spotify.
I do believe they live up to Wikipedia’s requirements for being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
IMHO they at least qualify for point #7: “Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city.”
They have invented their own genre, which makes them unique and culturally interesting. At least interesting enough for being picked up by LA Times, Revolver Magazine, and Metalhammer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The article has been up for almost three weeks now. I think it’s longer AfD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicStr ( talk • contribs) 00:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)