- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Twin Sisters Reunite
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Twin Sisters Reunite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A human interest story that does not meet WP:NEVENT. The assertion that this event led to further research appears to be false, or at least is not supported by the provided citation. signed, Rosguill talk 22:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 23:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The source has been revealed through a news report video.
Junkrak —Preceding undated comment added 03:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I got some reliable sources from Cambridge University and ABC News and all of the sources tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Case closed.
User:Junkrak December 27, 2019 22:05 (UTC)
- Delete. it's a one-time heartwarming event. Good Morning America has done a fine job preserving the story, but it is not encyclopedic material. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 05:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEVENT. The story is heartwarming and the original creator of the article obviously cares enough to write about the topic, but unfortunately it is not notable. #4 specifically mentions "viral phenomena" and there doesn't appear to be enduring significance to counteract that. Clovermoss (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails to meet [[WP:NEVENT]. Doesn't seem to have had a lasting significance. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 14:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Twin Sisters Reunite
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Twin Sisters Reunite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A human interest story that does not meet WP:NEVENT. The assertion that this event led to further research appears to be false, or at least is not supported by the provided citation. signed, Rosguill talk 22:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 23:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The source has been revealed through a news report video.
Junkrak —Preceding undated comment added 03:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I got some reliable sources from Cambridge University and ABC News and all of the sources tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Case closed.
User:Junkrak December 27, 2019 22:05 (UTC)
- Delete. it's a one-time heartwarming event. Good Morning America has done a fine job preserving the story, but it is not encyclopedic material. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 05:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEVENT. The story is heartwarming and the original creator of the article obviously cares enough to write about the topic, but unfortunately it is not notable. #4 specifically mentions "viral phenomena" and there doesn't appear to be enduring significance to counteract that. Clovermoss (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails to meet [[WP:NEVENT]. Doesn't seem to have had a lasting significance. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 14:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.