The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I also can find nothing useful beyond the one newspaper article already cited on the page. Otherwise they appear in brief gig announcements and their own self-created websites. The article's bizarre formatting indicates to me that it was directly copy/pasted from somewhere else, and no Wikipedia article on any band lists every single one of their songs and every single one of their performances. Also, the article says that it came from the Articles for Creation process, but it appears that nobody on that team reviewed it, as indicated by its many style errors. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 20:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
the information on [Tuneful Teachers' official site] is being transferred here (emphasis added). Neither Earwig nor my brief skim of the official site pages found copied text.
Rotideypoc41352 (
talk·contribs)
19:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
So what? Below, the article creator said that the singing group's current site is being deleted and "the information on it is being transferred here for purposes of being archived". The difference between text and information is irrelevant; transferred and archived are the terms to discuss. Wikipedia is not an archive for dead/dying websites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 16:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
In response to "the bizarre formatting" -- this is because the author is amateur at coding. The tone of this notion to delete comes off as an attack to the author rather than any breach of Wiki standards. There are no copyright violations as the creator of the media is the director of this publication. The flagged wordpress site is in process of deletion and the information on it is being transferred here for purposes of being archived. This page is still being edited. --Jared — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JaredVPurcell (
talk •
contribs)
03:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
This debate isn't about you and your skill level, it's about Tuneful Teachers. The issue is their
notability, and the article really does breach several Wikipedia standards for formatting and content. Wikipedia is also not a place to archive material from a different website. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I also can find nothing useful beyond the one newspaper article already cited on the page. Otherwise they appear in brief gig announcements and their own self-created websites. The article's bizarre formatting indicates to me that it was directly copy/pasted from somewhere else, and no Wikipedia article on any band lists every single one of their songs and every single one of their performances. Also, the article says that it came from the Articles for Creation process, but it appears that nobody on that team reviewed it, as indicated by its many style errors. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 20:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
the information on [Tuneful Teachers' official site] is being transferred here (emphasis added). Neither Earwig nor my brief skim of the official site pages found copied text.
Rotideypoc41352 (
talk·contribs)
19:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
So what? Below, the article creator said that the singing group's current site is being deleted and "the information on it is being transferred here for purposes of being archived". The difference between text and information is irrelevant; transferred and archived are the terms to discuss. Wikipedia is not an archive for dead/dying websites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 16:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
In response to "the bizarre formatting" -- this is because the author is amateur at coding. The tone of this notion to delete comes off as an attack to the author rather than any breach of Wiki standards. There are no copyright violations as the creator of the media is the director of this publication. The flagged wordpress site is in process of deletion and the information on it is being transferred here for purposes of being archived. This page is still being edited. --Jared — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JaredVPurcell (
talk •
contribs)
03:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
This debate isn't about you and your skill level, it's about Tuneful Teachers. The issue is their
notability, and the article really does breach several Wikipedia standards for formatting and content. Wikipedia is also not a place to archive material from a different website. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.