- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miss Montana USA. Since the RfC is still active, it is a good idea to allow non-admins to access the page history. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 09:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Tori Wanty
- Tori Wanty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article tells us very little about Wanty, and has no indication she is known for anything other than winning Miss Montana USA. That alone is not enough to establish notability. Neither of the two sources linked has a working link. One looks like it might be an extremely short mention, possibly in a longer list. The other may be more substantial, but it is not clear that it is a reliable source. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 23:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Montana USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater ( talk) 01:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Montana USA This is a WP:BIO1E and I don't see enough sources to enable the expansion of this beyond a stub. A redirect to the Miss Montana USA article is appropriate here. If she achieves notability later, we can always undo the redirect. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 07:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect as per above.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 20:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO1E; the subject is otherwise not notable. I advocate deletion as the name has not likely became well know to serve as a useful search term. (If the closer's decision is to redirect, I suggest delete first).
- Separately, the discussion on pageant winners' notability is taking place: here, with participants variously advocating that (1) state level winners are not presumed notable, (2) state-level winners are not presumed non-notable; and (2) a special guideline is unnecessary, and that GNG should be used. There is no indication that state-level winners would be presumed notable for the win alone. Thus "keep for now" comment is not a valid argument in this discussion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miss Montana USA. Since the RfC is still active, it is a good idea to allow non-admins to access the page history. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 09:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Tori Wanty
- Tori Wanty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article tells us very little about Wanty, and has no indication she is known for anything other than winning Miss Montana USA. That alone is not enough to establish notability. Neither of the two sources linked has a working link. One looks like it might be an extremely short mention, possibly in a longer list. The other may be more substantial, but it is not clear that it is a reliable source. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 23:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Montana USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America 1000 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater ( talk) 01:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Montana USA This is a WP:BIO1E and I don't see enough sources to enable the expansion of this beyond a stub. A redirect to the Miss Montana USA article is appropriate here. If she achieves notability later, we can always undo the redirect. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 07:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect as per above.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 20:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO1E; the subject is otherwise not notable. I advocate deletion as the name has not likely became well know to serve as a useful search term. (If the closer's decision is to redirect, I suggest delete first).
- Separately, the discussion on pageant winners' notability is taking place: here, with participants variously advocating that (1) state level winners are not presumed notable, (2) state-level winners are not presumed non-notable; and (2) a special guideline is unnecessary, and that GNG should be used. There is no indication that state-level winners would be presumed notable for the win alone. Thus "keep for now" comment is not a valid argument in this discussion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.