The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Missvain (
talk) 17:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Non notable rapper who satisfies no criterion from
WP:MUSICBIO. A before search shows he lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of
WP:GNG also. Celestina007 (
talk) 14:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
At least two of the “solid sources” you dropped here all required subscriptions so I couldn’t read any of them, the other ones are weak just as you said. In one of those “weak sources” dated July 2020 it explains how he never intended to go viral but did go viral after doing a song on Taylor and a few other sources shows his presumed notability is centered on this.
WP:1EVENT &
WP:TOOSOON may apply here as well. Celestina007 (
talk) 10:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Requiring a subscription does not disqualify the source in any way whatsoever. That has been the case for years. Four solid sources exist. Meets GNG.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 08:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per WG's sources. We're close-ish to
WP:BLP1E territory, but a feature profile in NYT plus a few other sources is good enough for me.
AleatoryPonderings (
???) (
!!!) 02:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as there is enough coverage in multiple reliable sources to pass
WP:GNG such as the NYT, Houston Chronicle, NPR, and Billboard, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Clearly passes the
WP:GNG per above sources.
gidonb (
talk) 05:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Missvain (
talk) 17:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Non notable rapper who satisfies no criterion from
WP:MUSICBIO. A before search shows he lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of
WP:GNG also. Celestina007 (
talk) 14:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
At least two of the “solid sources” you dropped here all required subscriptions so I couldn’t read any of them, the other ones are weak just as you said. In one of those “weak sources” dated July 2020 it explains how he never intended to go viral but did go viral after doing a song on Taylor and a few other sources shows his presumed notability is centered on this.
WP:1EVENT &
WP:TOOSOON may apply here as well. Celestina007 (
talk) 10:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Requiring a subscription does not disqualify the source in any way whatsoever. That has been the case for years. Four solid sources exist. Meets GNG.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 08:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per WG's sources. We're close-ish to
WP:BLP1E territory, but a feature profile in NYT plus a few other sources is good enough for me.
AleatoryPonderings (
???) (
!!!) 02:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as there is enough coverage in multiple reliable sources to pass
WP:GNG such as the NYT, Houston Chronicle, NPR, and Billboard, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Clearly passes the
WP:GNG per above sources.
gidonb (
talk) 05:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.