The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: There's not a useful source in the article for notability with some blatantly unreliable such as LinkedIn, Bored Panda and The Social Strategy which is an influencer agency.
S0091 (
talk)
18:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only Google News results are for the same event + one paragraph for a different event, and I don't think the outlets are reliable either.
Aaron Liu (
talk)
16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. A community college instructor is extremely unlikely to pass
WP:PROF, and we have no independent evidence that he even is a community college instructor, leaving only
WP:GNG as a possibility. But dubiously-reliable coverage of a single event isn't good enough for that either. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
17:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. No indications of notability for GNG or PROF. Only sources I could find are trivial or primary, and it's difficult to nail down anything about this person that is actually reliable even when it comes to fact-of statements.
nf utvol (
talk)
16:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: As others have said, there aren't any good sources. I know this for a fact because I created this draft (
Draft:The Speech Prof) back in October and determined there weren't enough sources for a good page. It appears that
MeltPees has copy-pasted a few of my drafts into the main space without any changes--some of which, like this one, don't meet GNG.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (
talk)
18:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: There's not a useful source in the article for notability with some blatantly unreliable such as LinkedIn, Bored Panda and The Social Strategy which is an influencer agency.
S0091 (
talk)
18:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only Google News results are for the same event + one paragraph for a different event, and I don't think the outlets are reliable either.
Aaron Liu (
talk)
16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. A community college instructor is extremely unlikely to pass
WP:PROF, and we have no independent evidence that he even is a community college instructor, leaving only
WP:GNG as a possibility. But dubiously-reliable coverage of a single event isn't good enough for that either. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
17:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. No indications of notability for GNG or PROF. Only sources I could find are trivial or primary, and it's difficult to nail down anything about this person that is actually reliable even when it comes to fact-of statements.
nf utvol (
talk)
16:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: As others have said, there aren't any good sources. I know this for a fact because I created this draft (
Draft:The Speech Prof) back in October and determined there weren't enough sources for a good page. It appears that
MeltPees has copy-pasted a few of my drafts into the main space without any changes--some of which, like this one, don't meet GNG.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (
talk)
18:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.