The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete no claim of notability. The only information here is that which you would find in a {{cite book}}.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 16:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c ) (
m) 04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Yes, a new section at Phishheads for these various books seems appropriate.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 17:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect, nom is correct, there's no justification for a separate article here, and a brief mention at Phish is all that is needed. Same goes for the similar Phish items here at AfD.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 15:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete no claim of notability. The only information here is that which you would find in a {{cite book}}.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 16:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c ) (
m) 04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Yes, a new section at Phishheads for these various books seems appropriate.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 17:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect, nom is correct, there's no justification for a separate article here, and a brief mention at Phish is all that is needed. Same goes for the similar Phish items here at AfD.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 15:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.