- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ashley Tesoro#Ministry. ...without prejudice to deletion of the redirect if the target is deleted, of course. j⚛e decker talk 17:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Tesoro Ministry Foundation
- Tesoro Ministry Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. References only give passing mention. Peter Rehse ( talk) 09:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No significant coverage shown to pass WP:CORP/ WP:GNG. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Ashley Tesoro#Ministry. The foundation is already mentioned there, and there is no additional information in this article worth merging. -- MelanieN ( talk) 17:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Even the
Ashley Tesoro article is problematic - all the references are primary. Its like a promotional walled garden.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 10:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest waiting until this is resolved, but you might consider AfDing it as well.
MelanieN (
talk) 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thinking about it. Peter Rehse ( talk) 15:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest waiting until this is resolved, but you might consider AfDing it as well.
MelanieN (
talk) 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Even the
Ashley Tesoro article is problematic - all the references are primary. Its like a promotional walled garden.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 10:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ashley Tesoro#Ministry. ...without prejudice to deletion of the redirect if the target is deleted, of course. j⚛e decker talk 17:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Tesoro Ministry Foundation
- Tesoro Ministry Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. References only give passing mention. Peter Rehse ( talk) 09:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No significant coverage shown to pass WP:CORP/ WP:GNG. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Ashley Tesoro#Ministry. The foundation is already mentioned there, and there is no additional information in this article worth merging. -- MelanieN ( talk) 17:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Even the
Ashley Tesoro article is problematic - all the references are primary. Its like a promotional walled garden.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 10:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest waiting until this is resolved, but you might consider AfDing it as well.
MelanieN (
talk) 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thinking about it. Peter Rehse ( talk) 15:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest waiting until this is resolved, but you might consider AfDing it as well.
MelanieN (
talk) 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Even the
Ashley Tesoro article is problematic - all the references are primary. Its like a promotional walled garden.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 10:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.