From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply

SuzanMarie

SuzanMarie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding evidence that the subject will pass WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR, after combing included sources, only two have enough content to potentially pass as significant coverage: ibtimes (unreliable per WP:RSP) and The National Era.

I don't know much about TNE (besides that the name is the same as an 1847 Washington newspaper) but the little research I did does not inspire confidence: No mentions of editorial responsibility or easy-to-find address, it's a wordpress site, established in 2021 ( Archive.org backs this as well) with some leftover test pages to boot (found by navigating to the generic "author" URL) and questionably generic author names ("George A").

Given that, and my failed source search, this will need better sources to be brought up to satisfy our notability requirements. ASUKITE 14:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply

SuzanMarie

SuzanMarie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding evidence that the subject will pass WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR, after combing included sources, only two have enough content to potentially pass as significant coverage: ibtimes (unreliable per WP:RSP) and The National Era.

I don't know much about TNE (besides that the name is the same as an 1847 Washington newspaper) but the little research I did does not inspire confidence: No mentions of editorial responsibility or easy-to-find address, it's a wordpress site, established in 2021 ( Archive.org backs this as well) with some leftover test pages to boot (found by navigating to the generic "author" URL) and questionably generic author names ("George A").

Given that, and my failed source search, this will need better sources to be brought up to satisfy our notability requirements. ASUKITE 14:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook