- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Sunny Ali
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sunny Ali ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Last year, CNMall41 ( talk · contribs) nominated this BLP for deletion but it was kept due to lack of consensus. The closing admin mentioned there's no prejudice to an immediate re-nomination. I tagged it last month for being promotional but now I've realized it also has issues with meeting WP:N. It clearly fails WP:GNG and I don't see how we can pass it based on WP:SNG. Also the creator Aanuarif ( talk · contribs) should disclose if there's UPE involved because if you look at their contributions, it seems very dubious. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strongly keep!
- Th Aanuarif ( talk) 11:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- ( Personal attack removed) Aanuarif ( talk) 11:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG and I don't think that an article about some random businessman should be part of an encyclopedia. Wikibear47 ( talk) 13:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, seems like a promotional business article. 182.182.29.217 ( talk) 19:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG created solely to promote the subject. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 15:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - My source assessment is in the previous AfD discussion. The main point of argument from !Keep votes there was the application of NEWSORGINDIA. Still do not see anything that would show how the subject is notable. The personal attack from creator was also unnecessary. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 22:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly non-notable or promotional to make it notable in disguise. Haruka Amaranth 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Sunny Ali
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sunny Ali ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Last year, CNMall41 ( talk · contribs) nominated this BLP for deletion but it was kept due to lack of consensus. The closing admin mentioned there's no prejudice to an immediate re-nomination. I tagged it last month for being promotional but now I've realized it also has issues with meeting WP:N. It clearly fails WP:GNG and I don't see how we can pass it based on WP:SNG. Also the creator Aanuarif ( talk · contribs) should disclose if there's UPE involved because if you look at their contributions, it seems very dubious. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strongly keep!
- Th Aanuarif ( talk) 11:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- ( Personal attack removed) Aanuarif ( talk) 11:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG and I don't think that an article about some random businessman should be part of an encyclopedia. Wikibear47 ( talk) 13:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, seems like a promotional business article. 182.182.29.217 ( talk) 19:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG created solely to promote the subject. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 15:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - My source assessment is in the previous AfD discussion. The main point of argument from !Keep votes there was the application of NEWSORGINDIA. Still do not see anything that would show how the subject is notable. The personal attack from creator was also unnecessary. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 22:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly non-notable or promotional to make it notable in disguise. Haruka Amaranth 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.