The result was no consensus. However, it seems that continued discussion about a merger could be helpful. If someone would like Heritage Universe restored in tandem, happy to provide without going through REFUND. Star Mississippi 01:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NBOOK, I could not turn up any coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 22:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 23:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
[W]hy would we want to have three books covered and two missing?Well, for much the same reason we'd decide to have articles on some topics and not others in any other context: because some are notable and some aren't. You're right, though, that the sourcing is weak enough that merging could still be a good approach – per WP:PAGEDECIDE, "Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article". But that larger article still has to be on a notable topic, and I'm not seeing anything indicating that the series is notable – for it to be so, we'd need sources discussing the series, not just its individual volumes. If there was to be a merge, the author's article is the only sensible target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 18:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. However, it seems that continued discussion about a merger could be helpful. If someone would like Heritage Universe restored in tandem, happy to provide without going through REFUND. Star Mississippi 01:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NBOOK, I could not turn up any coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 22:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 23:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
[W]hy would we want to have three books covered and two missing?Well, for much the same reason we'd decide to have articles on some topics and not others in any other context: because some are notable and some aren't. You're right, though, that the sourcing is weak enough that merging could still be a good approach – per WP:PAGEDECIDE, "Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article". But that larger article still has to be on a notable topic, and I'm not seeing anything indicating that the series is notable – for it to be so, we'd need sources discussing the series, not just its individual volumes. If there was to be a merge, the author's article is the only sensible target. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 18:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)