The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 18:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
AfD: Nominated for deletion; The person is clearly not notable for this article to remain and is not active in the sector claimed. The tone of the statement released by the company that sacked him recently, raise many concerns and questions, its meaning is very clear in financial services. There is a clear lack of objectivity in the article e.g. Career and Early Life. The quoted sources for such sections are very poor and not independent or known well, as they could be paid for to provide a feature on the person. What is the relation of pilgrimage here, it is a bit dramatic rather than objective facts. Also there is not an independent reliable source about his involvement in advisory groups to government and other organisations. It is very bold claim without a reliable independent proof to support it. This is not in accordance with Wiki's policies. This article should be seriously considered for deletion as it violates various Wiki's criteria. It takes just a few thorough objective and independent checks to conclude that this article should be deleted. Created at 13:43, 30 July 2019 by Majidii1234 ( contributions)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 18:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
AfD: Nominated for deletion; The person is clearly not notable for this article to remain and is not active in the sector claimed. The tone of the statement released by the company that sacked him recently, raise many concerns and questions, its meaning is very clear in financial services. There is a clear lack of objectivity in the article e.g. Career and Early Life. The quoted sources for such sections are very poor and not independent or known well, as they could be paid for to provide a feature on the person. What is the relation of pilgrimage here, it is a bit dramatic rather than objective facts. Also there is not an independent reliable source about his involvement in advisory groups to government and other organisations. It is very bold claim without a reliable independent proof to support it. This is not in accordance with Wiki's policies. This article should be seriously considered for deletion as it violates various Wiki's criteria. It takes just a few thorough objective and independent checks to conclude that this article should be deleted. Created at 13:43, 30 July 2019 by Majidii1234 ( contributions)