- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Skygge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
speedy declined because 'they are signed to a notable label', in this case an only possibly notable offshoot of a conglomerate. A horrible bunch of promotional fluff about a band tat barely exist, which is why I don't think they are notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment What is the "notable label" that are signed to? Without a reference how can such a claim be verified? All I can find is they've posted stuff on spotify and other self-download sites. I'm abstaining from voting because researching this AfD will require--I suspect--reading French (which I can't do). However I am immediately suspicious that any musical act that was formed little over than a year ago and whose first release, as of this writing, is three weeks old, can be considered encylopedic worthy. ShelbyMarion ( talk) 18:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to be able to read French, ShelbyMarion, there are mentions in reliable sources in English: [1], [2]. However, this all reeks of WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO, with lots of peacock language, such as a total misuse of the word "breakthrough". Richard3120 ( talk) 20:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet WP:NBAND and significant RS coverage not found. Just a bunch of promo 'cruft; belongs on the band's Facebook page, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Skygge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
speedy declined because 'they are signed to a notable label', in this case an only possibly notable offshoot of a conglomerate. A horrible bunch of promotional fluff about a band tat barely exist, which is why I don't think they are notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 15:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment What is the "notable label" that are signed to? Without a reference how can such a claim be verified? All I can find is they've posted stuff on spotify and other self-download sites. I'm abstaining from voting because researching this AfD will require--I suspect--reading French (which I can't do). However I am immediately suspicious that any musical act that was formed little over than a year ago and whose first release, as of this writing, is three weeks old, can be considered encylopedic worthy. ShelbyMarion ( talk) 18:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to be able to read French, ShelbyMarion, there are mentions in reliable sources in English: [1], [2]. However, this all reeks of WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO, with lots of peacock language, such as a total misuse of the word "breakthrough". Richard3120 ( talk) 20:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet WP:NBAND and significant RS coverage not found. Just a bunch of promo 'cruft; belongs on the band's Facebook page, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.