- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Sirbaz Khan
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sirbaz Khan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail the standards of WP:ANYBIO. A geolocation shows that they're located in Pakistan [1], so it's not unlikely that they wrote this article about themselves. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Huh? "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included" is right above ANYBIO. There's clear sigcov, and it's easy to pick three sources that show it –
[2],
[3],
[4] – and if there's doubts about reliability for any of these, Dawn has several citations in the article (I wanted to pick ones from different sources). Also notifying
S0091, who accepted the article at AFC.
Skarmory
(talk •
contribs)
03:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Skarmory thanks for ping though it may be considered
canvassing so will not participate other than to say I have no issue with the AGF nom.
S0091 (
talk)
15:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Appreciate the concern for canvassing – more just wanted to see if you had any input as to why you accepted this article at AFC. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 16:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Skarmory thanks for ping though it may be considered
canvassing so will not participate other than to say I have no issue with the AGF nom.
S0091 (
talk)
15:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep It can be hard to distinguish SIGCOV in mountaineering sources, because so much of the information comes from the support team assisting in getting the mountaineer up the mountain and the mountaineer themself, but this individual has enough separate reports about separate/multiple summits from differing sources that I think it meets WP:GNG. — siro χ o
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:GNG with sufficient coverage in reliable sources. Insight 3 ( talk) 03:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 05:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Sirbaz Khan
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sirbaz Khan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail the standards of WP:ANYBIO. A geolocation shows that they're located in Pakistan [1], so it's not unlikely that they wrote this article about themselves. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Huh? "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included" is right above ANYBIO. There's clear sigcov, and it's easy to pick three sources that show it –
[2],
[3],
[4] – and if there's doubts about reliability for any of these, Dawn has several citations in the article (I wanted to pick ones from different sources). Also notifying
S0091, who accepted the article at AFC.
Skarmory
(talk •
contribs)
03:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Skarmory thanks for ping though it may be considered
canvassing so will not participate other than to say I have no issue with the AGF nom.
S0091 (
talk)
15:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Appreciate the concern for canvassing – more just wanted to see if you had any input as to why you accepted this article at AFC. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 16:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Skarmory thanks for ping though it may be considered
canvassing so will not participate other than to say I have no issue with the AGF nom.
S0091 (
talk)
15:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep It can be hard to distinguish SIGCOV in mountaineering sources, because so much of the information comes from the support team assisting in getting the mountaineer up the mountain and the mountaineer themself, but this individual has enough separate reports about separate/multiple summits from differing sources that I think it meets WP:GNG. — siro χ o
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:GNG with sufficient coverage in reliable sources. Insight 3 ( talk) 03:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 05:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.