The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The coverage is not “routine”, it is information from various journalists that attended the shows and reported on what took place, and how those shows resonated so deeply with the audience. Furthermore, other of my references go into detail on band history and such, pointing as to why the tour itself was as important as it was.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
19:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment - I was the one who added a notability tag and raised concerns on the talk page. Yes, there are some reliable sources that have reported on the tour, but I'm not sure it meets NTOUR's "Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability" clause. Most sources are pretty basic "this tour is happening with this lineup" and most content is already better written at the respective band and album articles. I'm leaning towards it failing
WP:MERGEREASON's redundancy clauses.
Sergecross73msg me23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect Article fails
WP:NTOUR and
WP:GNG. In my honest opinion, I would say that the tour would be at best, mentioned on the album article that the tour is in support of (minus the tour dates) as well as on the band's article.
HorrorLover555 (
talk)
20:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The sources provided for the tour’s information pass
WP:NTOUR given how in depth they go towards the band’s artistic choices on this tour, and the significance of it to the fanbase. As for
WP:GNG, I fail to see how the article doesn’t check all of those boxes.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
21:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Would like to point out one more time that the sources for this article largely go in depth on the subject and provide detailed information on various aspects of this tour and its importance. Not to mention the overall importance of this tour, how it has affected the band since, and how much mainstream coverage/attention this tour was given.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
04:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The coverage is not “routine”, it is information from various journalists that attended the shows and reported on what took place, and how those shows resonated so deeply with the audience. Furthermore, other of my references go into detail on band history and such, pointing as to why the tour itself was as important as it was.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
19:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment - I was the one who added a notability tag and raised concerns on the talk page. Yes, there are some reliable sources that have reported on the tour, but I'm not sure it meets NTOUR's "Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability" clause. Most sources are pretty basic "this tour is happening with this lineup" and most content is already better written at the respective band and album articles. I'm leaning towards it failing
WP:MERGEREASON's redundancy clauses.
Sergecross73msg me23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect Article fails
WP:NTOUR and
WP:GNG. In my honest opinion, I would say that the tour would be at best, mentioned on the album article that the tour is in support of (minus the tour dates) as well as on the band's article.
HorrorLover555 (
talk)
20:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The sources provided for the tour’s information pass
WP:NTOUR given how in depth they go towards the band’s artistic choices on this tour, and the significance of it to the fanbase. As for
WP:GNG, I fail to see how the article doesn’t check all of those boxes.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
21:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Would like to point out one more time that the sources for this article largely go in depth on the subject and provide detailed information on various aspects of this tour and its importance. Not to mention the overall importance of this tour, how it has affected the band since, and how much mainstream coverage/attention this tour was given.
Squishedargarine (
talk)
04:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.