The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
promotional article by undeclared paid editor. That's reason enough for deletion, bu additionally every source in either PR, his own work, or a mere notice. DGG (
talk ) 03:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete- promotional article, about a subject with questionable notability.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 20:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - can't find any source that would fulfill criteria of GNG for this name.
Lorstaking (
talk) 07:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
promotional article by undeclared paid editor. That's reason enough for deletion, bu additionally every source in either PR, his own work, or a mere notice. DGG (
talk ) 03:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete- promotional article, about a subject with questionable notability.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 20:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - can't find any source that would fulfill criteria of GNG for this name.
Lorstaking (
talk) 07:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.