The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him. A before search did show
this source (which isn’t really great as it reads like an announcement) asides that the other hits are blatantly unreliable as they are user generated material, sponsored posts, or interviews, which are not independent of him hence all unreliable. This is a
WP:GNG &
WP:ANYBIO fail. Celestina007 (
talk)
15:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Hi team, i am responsible for the creation of
Senzo Mazingiza article, the article is notable but it only fits for
WP:SPORTSPERSON the problem is i did'nt know how to cite from the the reliable sources because, i was wondering how could a person like him culd still be no notable, until some admin give me refe to read
WP:NPERSON and
WP:42 So he asked me to read them and understand so that i could provide 3 sorces that team will use to establish the Article. You may Google him and see, because he is very popular in Africa because of his Sports experience since 2000 and he had helped a lot of International Football team to achieve in many League's. The guy he is from South Africa but where the 2010 FIFA WORLD CUP took place and he was selected as member of committee for the preperations. THANKS
4realtz (
talk)
10:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - seems to be the subject of a lot of coverage and not just for one event; the article is promotional but that, in itself, is not a reason for deletion
News 24Sowetan LiveThe CitizenBBCKawowoGoal.com On their own, these sources aren't that much but the sheer number of articles, both recent and old, would be enough for an article in my view
Spiderone22:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him. A before search did show
this source (which isn’t really great as it reads like an announcement) asides that the other hits are blatantly unreliable as they are user generated material, sponsored posts, or interviews, which are not independent of him hence all unreliable. This is a
WP:GNG &
WP:ANYBIO fail. Celestina007 (
talk)
15:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Hi team, i am responsible for the creation of
Senzo Mazingiza article, the article is notable but it only fits for
WP:SPORTSPERSON the problem is i did'nt know how to cite from the the reliable sources because, i was wondering how could a person like him culd still be no notable, until some admin give me refe to read
WP:NPERSON and
WP:42 So he asked me to read them and understand so that i could provide 3 sorces that team will use to establish the Article. You may Google him and see, because he is very popular in Africa because of his Sports experience since 2000 and he had helped a lot of International Football team to achieve in many League's. The guy he is from South Africa but where the 2010 FIFA WORLD CUP took place and he was selected as member of committee for the preperations. THANKS
4realtz (
talk)
10:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - seems to be the subject of a lot of coverage and not just for one event; the article is promotional but that, in itself, is not a reason for deletion
News 24Sowetan LiveThe CitizenBBCKawowoGoal.com On their own, these sources aren't that much but the sheer number of articles, both recent and old, would be enough for an article in my view
Spiderone22:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.