The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Almost nine months after the previous AFD, there is still not a single source with even a full sentence about him.
KSFT(
t|
c)21:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - I had advocated a 'delete' in
the previous AfD. Mainly on
WP:TOOSOON grounds. While I am perhaps not swayed to recommend a firm 'keep', I do not feel I can agree with the "not a single sentence since" statement in the nom. As, in the months since (Apr 2017 to Jan 2018), there does seem to have been
an increase in
some types of coverage. While it may still be slightly TOOSOON, I am shifted to a more neutral stance based on the activity in the intervening months. If the community feels that the article is to be kept, then the scope and references will need to be firmed-up (to avoid a loosely sourced article becoming a magnet for more
loosely framed nonsense).
Guliolopez (
talk)
00:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Evaluation of new sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ansh66603:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Almost nine months after the previous AFD, there is still not a single source with even a full sentence about him.
KSFT(
t|
c)21:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - I had advocated a 'delete' in
the previous AfD. Mainly on
WP:TOOSOON grounds. While I am perhaps not swayed to recommend a firm 'keep', I do not feel I can agree with the "not a single sentence since" statement in the nom. As, in the months since (Apr 2017 to Jan 2018), there does seem to have been
an increase in
some types of coverage. While it may still be slightly TOOSOON, I am shifted to a more neutral stance based on the activity in the intervening months. If the community feels that the article is to be kept, then the scope and references will need to be firmed-up (to avoid a loosely sourced article becoming a magnet for more
loosely framed nonsense).
Guliolopez (
talk)
00:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Evaluation of new sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ansh66603:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.