![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 June 12. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 July 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Insufficient evidence of notability established within the discussion - interesting thoughts for a merge target, Morbidthoughts, but I think it should probably be bundled as part of the DRV you refer to. To be explicit, the participants in this discussion suggesting retention failed to evidence reliable sources sufficient to satisfy WP:N. Fritzpoll ( talk) 20:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Not yet sufficiently notable teen. See also Nathan Adam. Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The Press & Journal article isn't about him (it's about new nominations for the award) and it doesn't cover him in detail. Neither article gives sufficient information to write an article (where/when was he born? what happened to the online bookshop? and so on).If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content.
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 June 12. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 July 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Insufficient evidence of notability established within the discussion - interesting thoughts for a merge target, Morbidthoughts, but I think it should probably be bundled as part of the DRV you refer to. To be explicit, the participants in this discussion suggesting retention failed to evidence reliable sources sufficient to satisfy WP:N. Fritzpoll ( talk) 20:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Not yet sufficiently notable teen. See also Nathan Adam. Dori ❦ ( Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The Press & Journal article isn't about him (it's about new nominations for the award) and it doesn't cover him in detail. Neither article gives sufficient information to write an article (where/when was he born? what happened to the online bookshop? and so on).If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content.